Profile

Cover photo
Alex Cannara
Attended Lehigh U. & Stanford U.
Lives in Bay Area, Calif.
189 followers|3,660 views
AboutPostsPhotosVideos

Stream

Alex Cannara

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
Apparently, the anti-nuke 'industry' has been shaken by the facts of nuclear power's unmatched safety, and pieces like Pandora's Promise.

Seems that perhaps IEER's ArjunM, for example, is worrying that his IRS Form 990 'salary' of over $277,000, taken from contributions, might reveal more "inconvenient truths" about the other folks in the anti-nuke 'industry' as well.  Will Calidicott's book & speaking income be revealed next?  Will PSR's & NIRS' funding dispersals be discovered?

Will Gundersen's fibs about Bremsstrahlung in TEPCO's water storage tanks be next for exposure?  And was it Grossman or Wasserman who ignorantly predicted stored fuel-rod removals could cause explosions?

Stay tuned, all those who unethically mislead our public in a time of great need for clean power.
--
Dr. A. Cannara
650 400 3071

Some refs...
AAAS Science, Vol 340, p678, 10 May 2013
www,thoriumremix.com  (2nd video graphic)
http://tinyurl.com/42wvr9l (1998)
www.unis.unvienna.org/unis/en/pressrels/2013/unisinf475.html  (2013 Fukushima)
http://cen.acs.org/articles/91/web/2013/04/Nuclear-Power-Prevents-Deaths-Causes.html
www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2012/06/10/energys-deathprint-a-price-always-paid/
www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-human-cost-of-energy
www.wano.info//article.cfm?id=the-human-cost-of-energy
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/?term=10.1289/ehp.1104294
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/prolonged-radiation-exposure-0515.html
www.latimes.com/science/la-me-west-coast-radiation-20140113,0,4048380.story#axzz2qLaxvaeX

Useful expose of the Fukushima radiation scare brigade...
http://deepseanews.com/2013/11/true-facts-about-ocean-radiation-and-the-fukushima-disaster/
http://deepseanews.com/2014/01/all-the-best-scientifically-verified-information-on-fukushima-impacts/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook
3
Add a comment...

Alex Cannara

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
1
Add a comment...

Alex Cannara

Shared publicly  - 
 
Sounds good, Bob.  I'd be sure to mention the transmission losses, as well as the environmental losses from cleared transmission corridors. If you can also point to the work going on re MSRs, so the topic gains awareness, that would be good too.  I often list these for environmental folks...
http://tinyurl.com/4t5ojde
http://tinyurl.com/7hatm2b
http://asia.iop.org/cws/article/news/47111
http://tinyurl.com/6vmaljn
http://vimeo.com/39052604
http://tinyurl.com/8ynwcqw
http://tinyurl.com/bpcrmy7

And these are effective in relation to LWR safety...
http://tinyurl.com/42wvr9l
http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/03/deaths-per-twh-by-energy-source.html
www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2012/06/10/energys-deathprint-a-price-always-paid/
--
Alex
2
Add a comment...
In his circles
28 people
Have him in circles
189 people
David LeBlanc's profile photo

Alex Cannara

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
Only one thing missing on our need for more nuclear power -- processing of materials needed to combat ocean acidification, which threatens ocean species, food chains & the natural carbon cycle.
1
Add a comment...
 
This trendy interface needs to be considerate of those with older eyes -- please stop with the grayed-out fonts already!
;]
As for safe energy, in all respects, watch Sorenson's video, and read the link below.

However, the problem we face with Al Gore, whom I've supported, is that he erred in becoming anti-nuclear without thoughtful examination.  It remains the safest form of mass generation ever deployed by mankind.  Al should think about why folks like James Hansen now advocate rapid nuclear deployments, as the Chinese, for example, are doing.

What also seems missing from Vice Pres. Gore's statements (and others; here) is that global warming & sea rise are peanuts compared to the real threat.  Combustion folks have already won.  They've converted >500 billion tons of fossil carbon to $ in their accounts.  And, they didn't even have to pay for the O2 they needed.  NASA has to!

The real threat is years away, not decades -- ocean acidification.  The seas' life forms provide most all carbon sequestration, as they die and their shells/skeletons form limestone on sea floors.  We are 0.1 pH away from shutting that down.  This makes oceans more nearly acidic now than at any time in the last 300 million years.

The natural carbon cycle via sea life & weathering can sequester <0.3 billion tons of carbon per year.  Our debt, in air & sea now is >500 billion tons,  Do the math. 

Read papers by Caldeira at Stanford, DePaolo at UC Berkeley, etc.  Even if all combustion stopped at the end of this sentence, more CO2 would continue to dissolve from air to seas, further acidifying them.  In just 150 years, we've moved all ocean pH half way to shutting down not only sequestration, but the food chains that sea life, and we, depend on.  If one thinks global warming is bad, sea rise is bad... then consider what is already happening in N. Atlantic waters and will continue to worsen, threatening about 20% of all human food protein -- that's what seas have delivered us and soon will not.

Pres. Kennedy was beginning a combustion-power solution in 1962:  http://tinyurl.com/6xgpkfa

The continuation of this path would have led us to zero combustion for power by about 2000.  The politics of the Cold War curtailed funding, however, so what Sorenson and I talk about in our links died for lack of funding in the '70s -- this despite successful safe nuclear prototypes operating in the '60s.  We got to the Moon, but we failed to stop trashing our home's carbon cycle.

Al needs to rethink his unwise anti-nuclear stance, as we all must.  The Chinese, Russians and others around the world are busy working to eliminate emissions via nuclear, because they know wind/solar 'farms' can't.

Our future has 3-legged, stable support in:  a) local solar, b) EVs & efficient storage, and c) advanced nuclear.  It's past time to act on that reality.

a) wasn't a reality in JFK's time,. It is today and still improving.  b) also was not practical -- it is becoming so now.  c) was practical in JFK's time and remains so -- the French have demonstrated for us all how nuclear power can eliminate emissions, and provide a major country with all the power it needs.  The "attach" button seems to have gone away, so the graph showing French triumph over emissions and nuclear ignorance will have to wait.

Al, in any  case, should know all this.  But now we need leadership on combating acidification via real action on ocean chemistry.  This is what we inherit by being foolishly anti-nuclear for decades.  Our descendents are looking back at us from the future.  We've not been doing well.  If we fail to prevent another 0.1 decrease in ocean pH, our descendents will have every right to spit on our graves.

Harsh?  Ma Nature doesn't care how dumb we are.  As the present Vice President said, among our rights is the "right to be stupid".  What that means is that others have to think and act, if any are to survive.

A decade or so ago, our energy debt was the need for 1GWe of non-emitting power put in operation every week.  Now, we need that every day, plus another, equal amount to provide materials to protect ocean chemistry.  Thus is our penance for ignorance, bias and sloth.
--
Dr. A. Cannara
650-400-3071  (call me Al, Al)
4
Add a comment...
People
In his circles
28 people
Have him in circles
189 people
David LeBlanc's profile photo
Education
  • Lehigh U. & Stanford U.
Basic Information
Gender
Male
Work
Employment
  • Consultant
Places
Map of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has lived
Currently
Bay Area, Calif.
Links