Profile

Cover photo
Terry Dyke
Worked at City of Austin
Attended University of Texas at Austin
Lives in Austin
1,580 followers|151,349 views
AboutPostsPhotosVideos

Stream

Terry Dyke

Shared publicly  - 
 
Obama said that Trump is unqualified to be President. Granted. Consider some further implications, less about partisan animus and more about institutional function.

It's the function of a party to identify and select a qualified presidential candidate. So by selecting Trump, the Republican Party is showing itself to be unqualified in fulfilling its function. To that extent, it is now dysfunctional as a party.

We don't really know yet whether this is due more to its nature as a Republican organization or its nature as a party.

If the latter, we may be learning something about the natural life-cycle of a political party that could very well apply to the Democratic Party at some point. Interesting times.
--
5
Jeff Zahari's profile photo
 
Sanders is a bit of a warning sign.
Add a comment...

Terry Dyke

Shared publicly  - 
 
With apologies to more tender sensibilities, ever since Occupy Wall Street gave us "Shit's fucked up and stuff," it's increasingly clear that there is not much "nice language" that is comprehensive and accurate enough to identify the predicament we've gotten into.

In the same vein but more detail, we're having to cope with:
- Social crapification
- Economic grift
- Political fuckery

And on it goes. For a final bit of vulgarity, note that there are those who actually prefer things this way. So we have to ask them a rude question: How much longer?
--
6
1
Terry Dyke's profile photo
 
P.S. No, it's not about Occupy Wall Street. Yes, it's about crapification, grift and fuckery.
Add a comment...

Terry Dyke

Shared publicly  - 
 
Several Blasts Rock Aramco Oil Facilities
Yemeni missle attacks pinpoint Saudi oil facilities.

Saudi Arabia, politically shaky as it is these days, chose to get involved in Yemen's civil war. As their Iraqi neighbors know, war is very bad for oil production.

Loss of Iraqi oil was bad enough for the world's petrophiles, but if Saudi Arabia even stumbles, the world is a giant step closer to the post-petroleum future -- but not in a good way.

Aramco oil facilities have come under repeated missile attacks by the Yemeni army and popular forces in the last several months. The Yemeni forces targeted the oil company in Jizan with Qaher-I ballistic missiles twice from mid to late December.

" The missile precisely hit Aramco oil company on Monday night," the Arabic-language media outlets quoted an unnamed Yemeni army official as saying after the second December attack. He reiterated that the missile attack came in retaliation for the Saudi-led aggressors' violation of the UN-sponsored ceasefire.

The monster Saudi state energy company Saudi Arabian Oil Co. – better known as Aramco, with its 261 billion barrels in reserves and 60,000 staff, has confirmed rumors that it is considering offering investors an initial public offering (IPO) on a small percentage of the company (around 5%), as part of a broader package of economic reforms.
--
The local residents of Al-Sharqiya region where the Baqiq industrial city and the Aramco oil facilities are located confirmed huge explosions near the huge oil facilities, the Arabic-language media outlets reported on Tuesday. Baqiq industrial city belongs to Aramco oil company which itself is ...
5
1
paul beard's profile photoOIL WATCH Group's profile photo
2 comments
 
thanks for posting Terry
cheers
Gray
Add a comment...

Terry Dyke

Shared publicly  - 
 
Much to our detriment, a conquered people doesn't just "get over it" in a few generations.

Just because they got defeated, we clearly didn't win their hearts and minds. So now we expect them to forgive and play nice?

At this point, the South has effectively completed a merger with the Republican Party, whose principal task since 1994 has been to gridlock Washington right out of the governing business.

Call it "Dixie's Revenge."
--
 
Happy Appomattox Day! The South lost 150 years ago -- get over it already.
13 comments on original post
10
1
Ramblings Of a Mad Clown's profile photoTerry Dyke's profile photoC.J. Shane's profile photo
4 comments
 
+Terry Dyke One of the most distressing things for me about the current political scene is how vulnerable Southerners are to Republican Party propaganda. The GOP is made up of a bunch of vultures who tell constant lies to get poor white Southerners to vote for Republican candidates. That also is an outcome of the post-Civil War events. The South was a plantation economy in which a small, wealthy white elite used poor, hardscrabble whites to enforce segregation and uphold the economy. pre-Civil War period. During the post-Civil War colonial period (South colonized by the North), good education and economic development (which go together) was denied white Southerners and has led to their vulnerability to right-wing propagandists today.  So many blacks left the South and went north in the Great Migration. The good news is that a lot of those blacks have come home to the South, and a lot of northerners have moved South in recent years. I think the South will change and  become far less reliable for Republicans in the future.
Add a comment...

Terry Dyke

Shared publicly  - 
 
More and merrier!
494
In this Circle:
Add people
1
Add a comment...

Terry Dyke

Shared publicly  - 
 
Come on in!
 
The 360 Degrees Circle - 02/03/15
If you want to add smart guys and brilliant ladies to your circles, you are at the right place: The 360 Degrees Circle is a great fellowship of nice people who turn everyday G+ to an awesome place. So, if you want to join these people in a relationship based on fun and friendship, add and share this circle and, maybe, next week you'll be in! ;))
360
In this Circle:
Add people
108 comments on original post
1
Add a comment...

Terry Dyke

Shared publicly  - 
 
Bingo. Of course  they're not over it. A conquered people doesn't just "get over it" in a few generations. Incredible short-sightedness by the US to think that military victory over a nation seeking independence would also win their hearts and minds.

"It's okay -- we just smashed half your population, most of your land and all of your aspirations, but now we can all of us just happily get on with being Americans."

Yeah, right -- this said to a people that didn't have any interest in being Americans in the first place, and arguably still don't.

They're a people who wanted their own country so they can do things according to their own values -- decidedly un-American values, but theirs nonetheless. If the UN considers independence a universal right, then the US should, too, and let Dixie go its own way.

The Cold Civil War started heating up in 1994 with the "Conservative Revolution," led and shaped by Southerners like Newt Gingrich and Dick Armey. It wasn't just a seat-count in Congress; it was a cultural overhaul that has only deepened since then.

The GOP may now be properly considered the political arm of a resurgent Dixie, whose aim was always to get out from under Washington. Now the GOP is succeeding in at least neutralizing Washington by gridlocking it right out of the governing business.

Oh, what they're up to, those wacky Republicans! Call it "Dixie's revenge."
--
 
Is it to late to let the South secede?
6 comments on original post
15
1
Sth Chn's profile photoJohnathan Gross's profile photoTerry Dyke's profile photo
12 comments
 
+Johnathan Gross Even though I don't happen to agree with that conclusion, I'd say first that it's not a matter of "better" or "worse" -- just adaptation to changing circumstances.
--
Add a comment...

Terry Dyke

Shared publicly  - 
 
A quiz for Independence Day 2016:

Why would it be wrong for Britain to want its independence from the Union? Consider America when it wanted independence from the Empire.

Are there fundamental differences? If independence is okay for the US, when is it okay for anyone else?

(Extra credit for answers that do not involve the idea of "voluntary" -- with the US union, southern states entered voluntarily, just as Britain did with the EU).
--
3
paul beard's profile photoTerry Dyke's profile photo
2 comments
 
Good points -- even though the first still invokes the voluntary/involuntary dimension, there are some key facts there. 

If I read it right, though, it does imply a premise that some bids for independence are more legitimate than others. Trouble with that is, who gets to decide the legitimacy?

I think the second point  gets closer to what we mean by "independence." Aside from the free-trade concept of interdependence, it's arguably still a form of dependence and could easily be perceived as such by a people seeking greater sovereignty for itself.

Gets back to what makes any such bid legitimate. Who has the say whether to approve or restrict the self-determination of others?
--
Add a comment...

Terry Dyke

Shared publicly  - 
 
In case you were wondering what the heck is going on in this country, it's about Dixie. Again. Still.

... The South’s current drive to impose on the rest of the nation its opposition to worker and minority rights—through the vehicle of a Southernized Republican Party— resembles nothing so much as the efforts of antebellum Southern political leaders to blunt the North’s opposition to the slave labor system.

... the South’s efforts to spread its values across America are advancing, as Northern Republicans adopt their Southern counterparts’ antipathy to unions and support for voter suppression, and as workers’ earnings in the North fall toward Southern levels. And now as then, a sectional backlash against Southern norms has emerged that, when combined with the Southern surge, is again creating two nations within one.
--
The Southern labor system (with low pay and no unions) is wending its way north.
6
2
paul beard's profile photoTerry Dyke's profile photoRamblings Of a Mad Clown's profile photo
13 comments
 
I respect you Terry .
Add a comment...

Terry Dyke

Shared publicly  - 
 
The party of Dixie

The "Conservative Revolution" of 1994, staged by Newt Gingrich, Dick Armey and other like-minded Southerners, was effectively a takeover of the Republican Party by Southern interests and leadership, and has stayed that way right up through the present.

Recently, the media trumpeted the defeat of "last Democrat" Mary Landrieu, a final milestone in the GOP's merger with the South.

The brand of "conservatism" they're promoting could more accurately be termed "Southernism," a particular mix of values that are essential to Dixie, but distinctly un-American -- patriarchy, theocracy, aristocracy, and caste.

The Republican crusade to force these values on America is actively supported, of course,  by the one percent, who appreciate the "aristocracy" part.

Washington has always been the South's nemesis, even before the Southern bid for independence was suppressed by force of arms in 1865. We shouldn't be puzzled that they never quite got Americanized -- a conquered people doesn't just "get over it" in a few generations.

So for 150 years, we've basically been stuck with a cold civil war.

The Southernized GOP has no use for Washington, saying right up front that "government is the problem," that it should be "drowned in the bathtub," and generally gridlocking Washington right out of the governing business. Call it "Dixie's revenge."

Constantly undermining the American government the way they do, and refusing to "compromise" -- i.e., to take part in governing -- stops looking like mere legislative opposition and starts looking more like fifth-column subversion.

It's getting to the point where the GOP should no longer be considered a legitimate political party. It is functioning more like an insurgency, and they need to be dealt with for what they are.

Then, maybe, we can turn our efforts to the root problem of this deep and endless divide in our country, the Southern question. Dixie wanted to be its own country, a different country, but we forced them to stay, and that has backfired horribly. Now what?

We need some workable answers, because all those irreconcilable differences keep getting in the way of having a truly American society -- prosperous, democratic, egalitarian, and secular.
--

  #GOP   #fifthcolumn   #Dixie   #ColdCivilWar #dividednation
125
28
Terry Dyke's profile photoLouis Doggett's profile photoJeremy Hymes-Balsley's profile photo
301 comments
 
+Louis Doggett PAHAHA!!! Tell me another! Let me guess, you're one of those guys who says Bush wasn't a Conservative. 

Let's break down the debt by President, usinghttp://useconomy.about.com/od/usdebtanddeficit/p/US-Debt-by-President.htm

Obama: +53% (6 years)
Bush 43: +101% (8 years)
Clinton: +32% (8 years)
Bush 41: +54% (4 years)
Reagan: +186% (8 years)
Carter: +43% (4 years)
Ford: +47% (4 years)
Nixon: +37% (4 Years)
Johnson: +13% (4 Years) 
Kennedy: +8% (4 years) 
Eisenhower: +9% (8 years)

The all-time record holder, FDR, racked up a 1048% increase over a 16 year term, the worst depression in the modern era, and the Second World War. 

You have to go back over a hundred years ago before you start to find any sort of support for 'Republicans are good for the budget', and the first President in the modern era who didn't have 16 years and a Great Depression and a global war to contend with who bumped the budget by more than 10% was...a Republican. His Republican replacement bumped the budget by even more, and after each time a Democrat got in after a Republican was in office, well, what do you know. Carter reduced the growth by 4%. Clinton reduced the growth by 22% (and note: he did so over 8 years where Bush 41 only had 4 years). And Obama has managed to cut the rate of growth in half.

So, your idea that Conservatives will shrink the debt? Pipe dream. Handing vast bags of cash to oil companies, the MIC (which one of your own warned you and us about...), and to multinationals loyal to no one else but themselves is too tempting to ever let the National Debt go down. Those bombs and missiles aren't gonna buy themselves, you know.

"You know, Paul, Reagan proved that deficits don't matter. We won the mid-term elections, this is our due." - Richard "Dick" Cheney, 2004
Add a comment...

Terry Dyke

Shared publicly  - 
 
Energy, complexity and the cornucopian myth

John Michael Greer revisits Overshoot and brings some historical perspective to our ecological predicament.

White’s Law, one of the fundamental principles of human ecology, ...holds that a society’s economic development is directly proportional to its consumption of energy per capita.

[Fossil fuels] boosted the concentration of the energy inputs available to industrial societies by an almost unimaginable factor...

If you have a highly concentrated energy source and don’t yet know how to use it efficiently, your society isn’t going to become as complex as it otherwise could. Over the three centuries of industrialization, as a result, the production of useful knowledge was a winning strategy, since it allowed industrial societies to rise steadily toward the upper limit of complexity defined by the concentration differential.

...inevitably, industrial societies ended up believing that knowledge all by itself was capable of increasing the complexity of the human ecosystem.

Since there’s no upper limit to knowledge, in turn, that belief system drove what Catton called the cornucopian myth, the delusion that there would always be enough resources if only the stock of knowledge increased quickly enough.
--

#energy #energydecline #overshoot #peakoil #transition #sustainability
I was saddened to learn a few days ago, via a phone call from a fellow author, that William R. Catton Jr. died early last month, just short of his 89th birthday. Some of my readers will have no idea who he was; others may dim...
7
7
Edward Morbius's profile photoRamblings Of a Mad Clown's profile photoTerry Dyke's profile photo
3 comments
 
+Ian Carlson Back at ya, bro!
Add a comment...

Terry Dyke

Shared publicly  - 
 
The #CulturalCreatives circle -- a carefully-vetted group of 100 artists, writers, makers, and thinkers on G+.

They all have 1000+ followers and post actively. Most tend toward the humanist/progressive/green end of things, and all have a creatively provocative take on this stuff that fills our waking hours.

If you are interested in joining the circle and expanding it, please do the following:

1. Add this to your circles
2. Add yourself to the circle
3. Share the expanded circle to Public
4. Include comments and #CulturalCreatives tag

Thanks!

Terry Dyke

#CulturalCreatives  #circles  #circlesharing   #sharedcircles    #publiccircles
100
In this Circle:
Add people
4
Bearman Cartoons's profile photoGary McLaren's profile photo
2 comments
 
Thank you +Terry Dyke 
Add a comment...
Work
Occupation
Writer, researcher, neighborhood organizer
Employment
  • City of Austin
    Research Analyst (retired), 2012
Places
Map of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has lived
Currently
Austin
Previously
San Antonio - Berkeley - Great Barrington MA - Lasqueti Island, BC - Dobbs Ferry NY - New Brunswick NJ - Caldwell ID - Gotemba, Japan - Stuttgart, Germany - Augsburg, Germany - Ft. Knox KY
Story
Tagline
It's late, and it's getting interesting...
Introduction
Neighborhood citizen and urban farming instigator. Relocalization advocate.

Old hippie with a mortgage, a pension and a contrarian view of The Future.

Army brat and conscientious objector. Former rocker, programmer, cable network exec, media consultant and public servant. Now happy to be full-time human and husband.

I follow energy and technology issues, particularly post-industrial and post-carbon social adaptation, and look for ways to "walk the walk."

Always grateful to talk to people with similar interests and concerns. Actually, with anyone who doesn't go "Huh?"

I write a lot more than I used to, but don't play as much music. I currently have a novel that I'm looking to get published.

For reals, I make stuff in my workshop.
Bragging rights
Able to empty a room in thirty seconds just by saying "peak oil."
Education
  • University of Texas at Austin
    Anthropology & Computer Science
Basic Information
Gender
Male