Noë has a nice article on art and science here. But, while the embodiment part is compelling, the essay falls down with a crash when he tries to make the argument that science, in principle, is unlikely to offer insight because of the open-endedness of what is art. What a strange idea. Happiness is also open-ended, yet there's significant progress on empirical approaches to understanding it. Ditto with health. Whatever his skepticism is about how science can't help with understanding our appreciation of art, it can't turn on art's open endedness. Noë siree.