Profile

Cover photo
Brandon Williams
Works at DataStax
Lived in San Antonio
182 followers|31,016 views
AboutPostsPhotosVideos

Stream

Brandon Williams

Shared publicly  - 
 
This is pretty cool. And Phil still has it.

http://www.nme.com/news/various-artists/77604
Former Genesis man had not performed live since his retirement in 2011
1
Add a comment...

Brandon Williams

Shared publicly  - 
 
Assembled and working.
5
K. Spoon (spoonix)'s profile photoJay Payne's profile photoMeiyu Delfs's profile photo
3 comments
 
Nice

Add a comment...

Brandon Williams

Shared publicly  - 
 
They may fall soon, but they made it a whole month, +Michael Shuler :)
4
Michael Shuler's profile photoBrandon Williams's profile photoRobert de Sequera's profile photo
4 comments
 
Nah. They are my adopted blue babies now. Lol. Otherwise they would have been green a long time ago. :D
Add a comment...

Brandon Williams

Shared publicly  - 
 
With many thanks to +Michael Shuler, #ingress, I am IN YOU!  And my nexus4 should up today too, but for now I'll slum it on the gnex and nexus7. I am the resistance.
2
Add a comment...

Brandon Williams

Shared publicly  - 
 
 
+Ingress (#Ingress)  Helping people get #Ingress Invite.. 

How to get #Ingress Invite ....  Simplest way

Step 1 :  +1 this post.
Step 2 : Share this post.
Step 3 : Circle +Ingress (#Ingress) 
Step 4:  Have fun

Our team will help hard for you to get invite ... Hurry ! there are limited invitations.

This trick worked for many ... Have  fun ....

#ingress   #ingressinvite   #ingressinviteplease     #ingressinvitesgiveaway   #ingressinvitation     #ingressresistance     #resistance     #reshare   #enlightenment  
4
Add a comment...

Brandon Williams

Shared publicly  - 
 
"Texas pretty"
1
Nathan Anderson's profile photoBrandon Williams's profile photoconor scully's profile photo
5 comments
 
yes, yes it is. i'm very much looking forward to seeing it again in 3 weeks.
Add a comment...
In his circles
124 people
Have him in circles
182 people
Hans Huberland's profile photo
Jeremy Sauls's profile photo
Dani Elias's profile photo
Brad McConnell's profile photo
brian griffey's profile photo
Major Hayden's profile photo
Wilson Ngu's profile photo
Gary Eckhardt's profile photo
Crispian Harris's profile photo

Brandon Williams

Shared publicly  - 
 
72 hours sous vide at 134F, finished on the grill.  Perfectly medium rare.
1
Michael Shuler's profile photoMeiyu Delfs's profile photo
2 comments
 
It was very yummy! Brandon, you need to make some more...alot more...for Peter's birthday party!!
Add a comment...

Brandon Williams

Shared publicly  - 
2
Eric Evans's profile photoMeiyu Delfs's profile photo
2 comments
 
Yeah, I used to be able to eat crap like that and sit at a desk all day and never exercise, too...wait 15 more years, Brandon!
Add a comment...

Brandon Williams

Shared publicly  - 
 
And now, a healthy lunch
1
brian griffey's profile photoBrandon Williams's profile photoMeiyu Delfs's profile photo
3 comments
 
Ewhhhh!  I had your sashimi dinner from the night before for lunch, so I'm glad you ate (ewh, again!) tomato soup instead!
Add a comment...

Brandon Williams

Shared publicly  - 
 
Smokin' Joe's super sandwich with +Eric Evans and +Gary Dusbabek
3
Eric Evans's profile photo
 
Super is apropos
Add a comment...

Brandon Williams

Shared publicly  - 
 
 
Dizzying but invisible depth

You just went to the Google home page.

Simple, isn't it?

What just actually happened?

Well, when you know a bit of about how browsers work, it's not quite that simple. You've just put into play HTTP, HTML, CSS, ECMAscript, and more. Those are actually such incredibly complex technologies that they'll make any engineer dizzy if they think about them too much, and such that no single company can deal with that entire complexity.

Let's simplify.

You just connected your computer to www.google.com.

Simple, isn't it?

What just actually happened?

Well, when you know a bit about how networks work, it's not quite that simple. You've just put into play DNS, TCP, UDP, IP, Wifi, Ethernet, DOCSIS, OC, SONET, and more. Those are actually such incredibly complex technologies that they'll make any engineer dizzy if they think about them too much, and such that no single company can deal with that entire complexity.

Let's simplify.

You just typed www.google.com in the location bar of your browser.

Simple, isn't it?

What just actually happened?

Well, when you know a bit about how operating systems work, it's not quite that simple. You've just put into play a kernel, a USB host stack, an input dispatcher, an event handler, a font hinter, a sub-pixel rasterizer, a windowing system, a graphics driver, and more, all of those written in high-level languages that get processed by compilers, linkers, optimizers, interpreters, and more. Those are actually such incredibly complex technologies that they'll make any engineer dizzy if they think about them too much, and such that no single company can deal with that entire complexity.

Let's simplify.

You just pressed a key on your keyboard.

Simple, isn't it?

What just actually happened?

Well, when you know about bit about how input peripherals work, it's not quite that simple. You've just put into play a power regulator, a debouncer, an input multiplexer, a USB device stack, a USB hub stack, all of that implemented in a single chip. That chip is built around thinly sliced wafers of highly purified single-crystal silicon ingot, doped with minute quantities of other atoms that are blasted into the crystal structure, interconnected with multiple layers of aluminum or copper, that are deposited according to patterns of high-energy ultraviolet light that are focused to a precision of a fraction of a micron, connected to the outside world via thin gold wires, all inside a packaging made of a dimensionally and thermally stable resin. The doping patterns and the interconnects implement transistors, which are grouped together to create logic gates. In some parts of the chip, logic gates are combined to create arithmetic and bitwise functions, which are combined to create an ALU. In another part of the chip, logic gates are combined into bistable loops, which are lined up into rows, which are combined with selectors to create a register bank. In another part of the chip, logic gates are combined into bus controllers and instruction decoders and microcode to create an execution scheduler. In another part of the chip, they're combined into address and data multiplexers and timing circuitry to create a memory controller. There's even more. Those are actually such incredibly complex technologies that they'll make any engineer dizzy if they think about them too much, and such that no single company can deal with that entire complexity.

Can we simplify further?

In fact, very scarily, no, we can't. We can barely comprehend the complexity of a single chip in a computer keyboard, and yet there's no simpler level. The next step takes us to the software that is used to design the chip's logic, and that software itself has a level of complexity that requires to go back to the top of the loop.

Today's computers are so complex that they can only be designed and manufactured with slightly less complex computers. In turn the computers used for the design and manufacture are so complex that they themselves can only be designed and manufactured with slightly less complex computers. You'd have to go through many such loops to get back to a level that could possibly be re-built from scratch.

Once you start to understand how out modern devices work and how they're created, it's impossible to not be dizzy about the depth of everything that's involved, and to not be in awe about the fact that they work at all, when Murphy's law says that they simply shouldn't possibly work.

For non-technologists, this is all a black box. That is a great success of technology: all those layers of complexity are entirely hidden and people can use them without even knowing that they exist at all. That is the reason why many people can find computers so frustrating to use: there are so many things that can possibly go wrong that some of them inevitably will, but the complexity goes so deep that it's impossible for most users to be able to do anything about any error.

That is also why it's so hard for technologists and non-technologists to communicate together: technologists know too much about too many layers and non-technologists know too little about too few layers to be able to establish effective direct communication. The gap is so large that it's not even possible any more to have a single person be an intermediate between those two groups, and that's why e.g. we end up with those convoluted technical support call centers and their multiple tiers. Without such deep support structures, you end up with the frustrating situation that we see when end users have access to a bug database that is directly used by engineers: neither the end users nor the engineers get the information that they need to accomplish their goals.

That is why the mainstream press and the general population has talked so much about Steve Jobs' death and comparatively so little about Dennis Ritchie's: Steve's influence was at a layer that most people could see, while Dennis' was much deeper. On the one hand, I can imagine where the computing world would be without the work that Jobs did and the people he inspired: probably a bit less shiny, a bit more beige, a bit more square. Deep inside, though, our devices would still work the same way and do the same things. On the other hand, I literally can't imagine where the computing world would be without the work that Ritchie did and the people he inspired. By the mid 80s, Ritchie's influence had taken over, and even back then very little remained of the pre-Ritchie world.

Finally, last but not least, that is why our patent system is broken: technology has done such an amazing job at hiding its complexity that the people regulating and running the patent system are barely even aware of the complexity of what they're regulating and running. That's the ultimate bikeshedding: just like the proverbial discussions in the town hall about a nuclear power plant end up being about the paint color for the plant's bike shed, the patent discussions about modern computing systems end up being about screen sizes and icon ordering, because in both cases those are the only aspect that the people involved in the discussion are capable of discussing, even though they are irrelevant to the actual function of the overall system being discussed.
1
Add a comment...

Brandon Williams

Shared publicly  - 
 
Yeah, that's my cup.
1
Add a comment...
People
In his circles
124 people
Have him in circles
182 people
Hans Huberland's profile photo
Jeremy Sauls's profile photo
Dani Elias's profile photo
Brad McConnell's profile photo
brian griffey's profile photo
Major Hayden's profile photo
Wilson Ngu's profile photo
Gary Eckhardt's profile photo
Crispian Harris's profile photo
Places
Map of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has lived
Previously
San Antonio
Links
Other profiles
Contributor to
Work
Employment
  • DataStax
    present
Basic Information
Gender
Male
Other names
driftx