could you contextualize or operationally define the word faith when you said that Science will require "faith". do take note that science does not require faith. I thought the scientific method of inquiry was thought in schools as early as the elementary days but i guess in your case you forgot about it or probably even rejected it.
second about the word "assumption" is it statistical assumption/s or just assumption/s in the context of the general meaning of the word? there is a big difference there
btw, if the opposite of good is evil(if i follow your line reasoning) then giving a wrong answer to a math question makes it an evil act. take note thats how you premised it when you said that Science cant determine good vs evil.
you know it does not make your argument correct or accurate or even sound when you use terms in a very loose if not out of context definitions. your entire video is essentially a blow by blow fallacy after fallacy after fallacy.... ;)