Basic Information

Gender

Male

Mark Farrugia

4,654 views

AboutPostsPhotos

Basic Information

Gender

Male

Note here how

I am guessing that there exists a quantum algorithm (using say, a

1

Mark Farrugia

+

1

2

1

2

1

(1) # of variables n == Temperature K

(2) Ratio m/n (clauses/variables) == Wavelength v/f (velocity/frequency)

(3) Peaks get sharper, and shift to lower X-axis values, as variables/temperature increase.

(4) Visible light is found centered around the peak of our Sun's ~5800K curve == location of the hardest problems in random 3SAT formulae.

(2) Ratio m/n (clauses/variables) == Wavelength v/f (velocity/frequency)

(3) Peaks get sharper, and shift to lower X-axis values, as variables/temperature increase.

(4) Visible light is found centered around the peak of our Sun's ~5800K curve == location of the hardest problems in random 3SAT formulae.

Add a comment...

Searching a

1

Add a comment...

Need to separate 3SAT hardness from 2SAT easiness for your P!=NP proof? Look no further than the Elementary Cellular Automata...

1

Mark Farrugia

+

1

2

1

2

1

Add a comment...

1

Add a comment...

White Light + Triangular Prism => Sorted Poly-Chromatic Spectral Information.

1

Add a comment...

1

Mark Farrugia

+

1

2

1

2

1

Feynman replaces complex numbers with spinning arrows, which start at emission and ends at detection of a particle. The sum of all resulting arrows represents the total probability of the event. In this diagram, light emitted by the source S bounces off a few segments of the mirror (in blue) before reaching the detector at P. The sum of all paths must be taken into account. The graph below the mirror depicts the total time spent to traverse each of the paths above.

Add a comment...

Nature also seems to return the

1

Mark Farrugia

+

1

2

1

2

1

If Nature computes, then presumably it also computes functions like x^2, which is not one-to-one, since (-2)^2 = 2^2 = 4, sth. its inverse is sqrt(4)= +/-2. So even knowing both the function being computed, as well as its result, it is still impossible to know from what initial value it came from. There exists a certain UNCERTAINTY...

Add a comment...

1

dT/dY(T^4) == 4*T^3 == O(T^3) What could this imply?

Add a comment...

High-energy 3-D EM standing-waves which oscillate FREQUENTLY between +/- values are very unlikely to be chosen as an occupying quantized mode within a blackbody cavity. They are often UNSATISFACTORY.

1

Add a comment...