Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Raju Chiluvuri
About
Posts

Post has attachment
The complementary perspective of “scientific methods” of Popper and Kuhn for comprehending the nature of scientific BoK (Body of Knowledge)
Dear
Friends, One can find many WebPages, if
he searches for “Kuhn Vs Popper”. Many of argue that there are certain differences
or even conflicts between “scientific method” of Popper and Kuhn. But I think,
Kuhn illustrates “how scientific disciplines progr...
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Is there a civilized way for exposing a geocentric paradox of a 21st century scientific discipline?
Dear Friends, Saying the truth “the Sun is at the
centre” 500 years ago offended common sense and deeply entrenched conventional
wisdom. Researchers refuse to see or investigate either evidence in support of
heliocentric model or counter evidence that could...
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Proof that computer science (Software) is pretend to be (or promoted as) science but has been created and maintained like a religion.
Dear Friends, What is the fundamental difference
between the religions and sciences? My understanding is, we can’t question the
validity of sacred beliefs in a religion such as existence of the God or basic
religious tenets or dogma? It is a heresy to even ...
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
My New Year Wish is to free software from The Elephant Rope Syndrome
Dear Friends, Software engineering has been collectively
conditioned between 1960s and 1980s by harsh and painful experiences of
failures and entrapped by “The Elephant Rope Syndrome” for past 25 years. The
researchers of computer science and software assum...
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
My New Year Wish is to free software from The Elephant Rope Syndrome
Dear Friends,         Software engineering has been collectively conditioned between 1960s and 1980s by harsh and painful experiences of failures and entrapped by “ The
Elephant Rope Syndrome” for past 25 years. The researchers of computer science
and softw...
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Would you knowingly risk your career, if openly defending or supporting Truth could ruin reputation or career (e.g. might put your promotion at risk)?
Dear
Friends,             If
and when counter-evidence brought to his/her notice for any concepts or
theories he has been promoting or supporting, isn’t it a moral and ethical
obligation of any researcher to address the counter-evidence? Obviously, it is
un...
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Isn’t it unethical or dishonest (if not fraud) to blindly support or promote any theory or concept by ignoring or hiding counter-evidence?
Dear Friends, The widely accepted ethical obligation and code of
conduct among the research communities is: It is unethical or dishonest (if not
fraud) to blindly support or promote any theory or concept (in the theoretical
foundation for or Body of Knowled...
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Isn’t it scandal (if not fraud), if scientists continue to rely on flawed myths which blatantly violate objective reality by ignoring clear warnings?
Dear Friends, I am sure almost
every scientist in the world must agree that: The biggest and most well-documented
mistake in the history of science is “relying on a flawed myth (i.e. the Earth
is static) without validating it”. The “scientific method” was f...
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
I disparately need help: How can I put research in the right path, which ended up in a wrong path due to mistakes committed 50 years ago?
Dear Friends, The biggest mistake in the history of science (committed
by researchers) was relying on untested and unproven flawed myth (i.e. the
Earth is static) for understanding the reality about nature. Exposing this
error led to the greatest scientific...
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Why many respected scientist feel it is a fraud/scam or crime to request for proof or question the validity of untested dogmatic myth?
Dear Friends, About 2000 years ago research community erroneously
concluded that “the Earth is static”. The research community relied on such
error (i.e. dogmatic myth) for understanding the reality, which diverted their
research efforts into a wrong path. ...
Add a comment...
Wait while more posts are being loaded