Posts
Post has attachment
Obama to Africa: Be wary of foreign powers, even us. "Don’t just assume that folks come here and they’re automatically benefiting Africans. And that includes the United States." Read more: http://wtim.es/17wFYQE
Good advice or just plain bizarre?
Good advice or just plain bizarre?

Bright Quang: Dear Attorney General state of California Sir,
If you are the best of Judge, you did not return my case of the Vietnam War. However, you have been protecting for your core of interests, you did not respect other burdens of suffering as like my broken life. As a result, the consequences of one's previous life is come to you because you must reap what you have sown.
If you behavior have treating for the equability in all, you must reap the best everything in your life. In fact, my case of the Vietnam War, which was your court system; it did not only return to me for the five times but also did not review when 5 U.S.C§ 702 - Right of review (Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966)A person suffering legal wrong because of agency action, or adversely affected or aggrieved by agency action within the meaning of a relevant statute, is entitled to judicial review thereof. An action in a court of the United States seeking relief other than money damages and stating a claim that an agency or an officer or employee thereof acted or failed to act in an official capacity or under color of legal authority shall not be dismissed nor relief therein be denied on the ground that it is against the United States or that the United States is an indispensable party. The United States may be named as a defendant in any such action, and a judgment or decree may be entered against the United States: Provided, That any mandatory or injunctive decree shall specify the Federal officer or officers (by name or by title), and their successors in office, personally responsible for compliance. Nothing herein (1) affects other limitations on judicial review or the power or duty of the court to dismiss any action or deny relief on any other appropriate legal or equitable ground; or (2) confers authority to grant relief if any other statute that grants consent to suit expressly or impliedly forbids the relief which is sought. But your court did not enforce to this bill, you always compel me and the Californian citizens that we must carry out the California laws and the American statutory.
Finally, I first submit my case of Vietnam War to you. Let you may review to what I was wrong and right when your court system did not enforce any laws of our nation and the state of California laws which is why I somehow stand behind your view-point and your families in order to struggle for the American justice. Let me donate the rest of my life to your political values and your Democratic families again.
Respectfully Yours
Bright Quang
_______________
* Please review my statement of Case's the Vietnam War.
And here are:
<br>No.___________________ <br>
<br>IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES<br>
<br>________________________________<br>
<br>Confidential Document: 532272<br>
<br>_________________<br>
<br>PETITITON FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI<br>
<br>________________________________<br>
<br>BRIGHT QUANG<br>
<br>Petitioner<br>
<br>V. <br>
<br>THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA<br>
<br>Respondent. <br>
<br>_________________________________<br>
<br>PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORRARI TO<br>
<br>THE UNITED STATES OF JUSTICE DEPARTMENT<br>
<br>FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT<br>
_______________________
<br>Self Help: Bright Quang<br>
<br>217 5th Ave # 8<br>
<br>Redwood City, CA 94063<br>
<br> (TEL) 650-278-9542<br>
<br> (Email) bright_qng@yahoo.com<br>
<br>CAPITAL CASE<br>
<br>QUESTIONPRESENTED<br>
<br>I. How does he make a claim for Federal Tort Claims Act l <br>House.gov for his lost fortune of investment, his Republic of <br>Vietnam, and imprisoned benefits Insurance of the Vietnam War- <br>whether his personal injuries, his father who was death without governments duties, which were not give any Death Certificate when <br>Republic of Vietnam and the United States of America were <br>partnerships each other. <br>
<br>II. What did his family and he grant for livelihood during they were <br>left on the battlefield of the Vietnam War without regrets by Foreign <br>Assistance Act of the United States of America in 1963, because of <br>Socialism Republic of Vietnam did not have any interactional <br>relations with the government of the US and Republic of Vietnam. <br>
<br>III. Would somehow can the defendant's statutory 28 U.S.C § 1346. <br>June 25,1948 understand about to burden sufferings and unluckiness <br>of the family plaintiff. During, his human dignity was humiliated by <br>his allied partnership and to should he do for defendant's US that's <br>self confessed wrongful actions of his litigation. <br>
<br>IV. Whether the United States of America exactly expressed the <br>righteousness, the human rights, the ethics, and the equality by the <br>United States Constitution, if not, the Justice of arrogance of <br>negligence of undisciplined-soldier of bankruptcy was the United <br>States of America of the Vietnam War. <br>
<br>TABLE OF PARTIES<br>
<br>THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA<br>
<br>TABLE OF CONTENTS <br>
<br>Page<br>
<br>QUESTIONS PRESENTED................................................................................... i <br>
<br>THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA................................................................ i<br>
<br>TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................................... ...................... vii <br>
<br>OPINIONS BELOW ................................................... .......................................... 1<br>
<br> JURISDICTION .................................................................................................. 1 <br>INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 1<br>
<br>BACKGROUND.....................................................................................................2<br>
<br>FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND........................................... 2<br>
<br>STATEMENT OF THE CASE....................................................................1..to..55<br>
<br>APPENDIX................................................................................................57 to 308<br>
<br>TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.....................................................................iv to vii<br>
<br>S. 484 BRING THEM HOME ALIVE....................................................................................................................2<br>
<br>9.11 PARTICULAR RIGHTS—FIRST AMENDMENT—"CITIZEN" PLAINTIFF 42 U.S.C.§1983..................................................................................3<br>
<br>22 U.S.C § 2451 - Pub. L 87-256§ 101, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat.527.....................4<br>
<br> 22 U.S.C. § 7103. Pub. L. 106–386, div. A, § 105.
Oct. 28, 2000-114 Stat. 1473..................................................................................5<br>
<br> 22. U.S.C§ 2403.Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, § 644, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. <br> 461..........5<br>
<br> 18 U.S.C§ 2381, June 25,1948,Ch.645, 62 Stat 807; Pub L 103-322.....................6<br>
<br> 10 U.S.C § 2733.[a] Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 153;
Pub. L. 85–729........................................................................................... ........... 6<br>
<br> 22 U.S.C§§1571_1604. Pub. L 329-81st Congress, 63 Stat 714
December 23, 1950...........................................................................................7<br>
<br> H.R.5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963...................................................... 7<br>
<br> H.R.7885- Pub. L, 88-205. Approved. December 16, 1963.............................8<br>
<br> 22 USC§ 2151 Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, § 101, formerly § 102, Sept4,1961......10<br>
<br> 22 USC§ 2151n- Human Rights and development Assistance
December 20, 1975.........................................................................................10<br>
<br> 5 U.S.C. §702Right of Review .Sep. 6,1966...............................................11<br>
<br> 18 U.S.C. § 227-Wrongfully influencing.Sep.14,2007..................................11<br>
<br> 26 U.S.C. § 7701.Definition Aug.16,1954....................................................12<br>
<br> 28 U.S.C. § 1621-Perjury general-June 25, 1948..........................................12<br>
<br> 21 USC§ 848 Oct. 27 1970.............................................................13 <br>
<br> 1 USC§ 112a United States Treaties.- Sept. 23, 1950..................................14<br>
<br> 1 USC§ 112-General Provision-July 30, 1947..............................................15<br>
<br> 1 USC§ 112b. United States International agreement-Aug. 22, 1972..........16<br>
<br> 37 U.S.C§ 552; Sep. 6,1966..........................................................................16<br>
<br> 5 U.S.C. § 552a-December 31,1974............................................................. 17<br>
<br> 38 U.S.C. § 101-Definitions. Sep.2, 1958.....................................................18<br>
<br> 38 U.S.C. §§ 1116-1311-Feb. 6, 1991-.........................................................18<br>
<br> 1 U.S.C. § 113July 30,1947....................................................................... 18<br>
<br> 22 U.S.C. § 7108. - Sep.22, 1961.................................................................19 <br>
<br> 35 U.S.C. § 183 Right to compensation. April 2, 1982...............................20<br>
<br> Civil Rights Action-42 U.S.C. § 1983..........................................................22<br>
<br> 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims against individuals...............................................22<br>
<br> Title VI CRA of 1964-42 U.S.C. § 2000D..................................................22<br>
<br> 28 U.S.C. § 4101-Dinfinitions; Aug. 10, 2010............................................23<br>
<br> California Vehicle Code Section 14103,14105, and 13953........................24<br>
<br> 18 U.S.C. §1705- Destruction of letter boxes or mail; June 25, 1948......25<br>
<br> California Civil Code§§§ 44,45a, and 46-Defamation, Libel, Slander......25<br>
<br> §46 Division1. person [38-86]....................................................................26<br>
<br> 42 U.S.C. § 1395- Prohibition against any Federal interference;
Aug. 14, 1935............................................................................................26<br>
<br> 17 U.S.C. § 1203 Civil remedies; Oct. 28, 1998......................................27<br>
<br> 17 U.S.C. § 411-Registration and Civil infringement action;
Oct. 19, 1976............................................................................................29<br>
<br> 42 U.S.C. §12101- Findings and purpose; July 26, 1990........................31<br>
<br> CACI Nos. 3940-3949-DAMAGES-.......................................................33<br>
<br> CACI No.3949.Punitive Damages_ Individual........................................33<br> <br>
<br> 28 U.S.C. § 1871 Fees; June 25, 1948.....................................................34<br>
<br> 44 U.S.C. § 3507- Public information collection activities;
May 22, 1995............................................................................................36<br>
<br> 5 U.S.C. § 3579-Student loan repayments-..............................................37<br>
<br> S 2040 Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism .......................................39<br>
<br> 50 U.S.C. §4105- Prisoners of War-June 24, 1970;................................40<br>
<br> 50 U.S.C. §4101 Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the
United States; July 3, 1948-....................................................................44<br>
<br> 28 U.S.C. § 1346b-June 25, 1948-.........................................................45<br>
<br> 28 U.S.C. §2671- Definitions-June 25, 1948;........................................46<br>
<br> 28 U.S.C. §2672- Administrative adjustment of Claims;
June 25, 1948.........................................................................................46<br>
<br> 28 U.S.C. §2673- Report to Congress-June 25, 1948............................47<br>
<br> 28 U.S.C. §2674 Liability of United States-June 25, 1948...................47<br>
<br> 28 U.S.C. §2677- Compromise-June 25, 1948......................................48<br>
<br> Amendment XIV...................................................................................49<br>
<br> 22 U.S.C. § 1622 a-U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 22. Transfer of
Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States
to Department of Justice........................................................................49<br>
<br> 22 U.S.C. § 1622 b- Transfer of functions.............................................49<br>
<br> 22 U.S.C. § 1622c- Membership of Foreign Claims.............................50<br>
<br> 22 U.S.C. § 1622d- Appointment and compensation............................51<br>
<br> 22 U.S.C. § 1622e- Vesting of all non-adjudicatory.............................52<br>
<br> 22 U.S.C. § 1622f-Foreign Relations and Intercourse- March 14, 1980............ ..52<br>
<br> 22 U.S.C. § 1622 g-Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement .......................52<br>
<br> 18 U.S.C. § 2340A- Torture..................................................................53<br>
On Tuesday, September 18, 2018, 12:13:27 PM PDT, Xavier Becerra <xavier@xavierbecerra.com> wrote:
If you are the best of Judge, you did not return my case of the Vietnam War. However, you have been protecting for your core of interests, you did not respect other burdens of suffering as like my broken life. As a result, the consequences of one's previous life is come to you because you must reap what you have sown.
If you behavior have treating for the equability in all, you must reap the best everything in your life. In fact, my case of the Vietnam War, which was your court system; it did not only return to me for the five times but also did not review when 5 U.S.C§ 702 - Right of review (Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966)A person suffering legal wrong because of agency action, or adversely affected or aggrieved by agency action within the meaning of a relevant statute, is entitled to judicial review thereof. An action in a court of the United States seeking relief other than money damages and stating a claim that an agency or an officer or employee thereof acted or failed to act in an official capacity or under color of legal authority shall not be dismissed nor relief therein be denied on the ground that it is against the United States or that the United States is an indispensable party. The United States may be named as a defendant in any such action, and a judgment or decree may be entered against the United States: Provided, That any mandatory or injunctive decree shall specify the Federal officer or officers (by name or by title), and their successors in office, personally responsible for compliance. Nothing herein (1) affects other limitations on judicial review or the power or duty of the court to dismiss any action or deny relief on any other appropriate legal or equitable ground; or (2) confers authority to grant relief if any other statute that grants consent to suit expressly or impliedly forbids the relief which is sought. But your court did not enforce to this bill, you always compel me and the Californian citizens that we must carry out the California laws and the American statutory.
Finally, I first submit my case of Vietnam War to you. Let you may review to what I was wrong and right when your court system did not enforce any laws of our nation and the state of California laws which is why I somehow stand behind your view-point and your families in order to struggle for the American justice. Let me donate the rest of my life to your political values and your Democratic families again.
Respectfully Yours
Bright Quang
_______________
* Please review my statement of Case's the Vietnam War.
And here are:
<br>No.___________________ <br>
<br>IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES<br>
<br>________________________________<br>
<br>Confidential Document: 532272<br>
<br>_________________<br>
<br>PETITITON FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI<br>
<br>________________________________<br>
<br>BRIGHT QUANG<br>
<br>Petitioner<br>
<br>V. <br>
<br>THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA<br>
<br>Respondent. <br>
<br>_________________________________<br>
<br>PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORRARI TO<br>
<br>THE UNITED STATES OF JUSTICE DEPARTMENT<br>
<br>FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT<br>
_______________________
<br>Self Help: Bright Quang<br>
<br>217 5th Ave # 8<br>
<br>Redwood City, CA 94063<br>
<br> (TEL) 650-278-9542<br>
<br> (Email) bright_qng@yahoo.com<br>
<br>CAPITAL CASE<br>
<br>QUESTIONPRESENTED<br>
<br>I. How does he make a claim for Federal Tort Claims Act l <br>House.gov for his lost fortune of investment, his Republic of <br>Vietnam, and imprisoned benefits Insurance of the Vietnam War- <br>whether his personal injuries, his father who was death without governments duties, which were not give any Death Certificate when <br>Republic of Vietnam and the United States of America were <br>partnerships each other. <br>
<br>II. What did his family and he grant for livelihood during they were <br>left on the battlefield of the Vietnam War without regrets by Foreign <br>Assistance Act of the United States of America in 1963, because of <br>Socialism Republic of Vietnam did not have any interactional <br>relations with the government of the US and Republic of Vietnam. <br>
<br>III. Would somehow can the defendant's statutory 28 U.S.C § 1346. <br>June 25,1948 understand about to burden sufferings and unluckiness <br>of the family plaintiff. During, his human dignity was humiliated by <br>his allied partnership and to should he do for defendant's US that's <br>self confessed wrongful actions of his litigation. <br>
<br>IV. Whether the United States of America exactly expressed the <br>righteousness, the human rights, the ethics, and the equality by the <br>United States Constitution, if not, the Justice of arrogance of <br>negligence of undisciplined-soldier of bankruptcy was the United <br>States of America of the Vietnam War. <br>
<br>TABLE OF PARTIES<br>
<br>THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA<br>
<br>TABLE OF CONTENTS <br>
<br>Page<br>
<br>QUESTIONS PRESENTED................................................................................... i <br>
<br>THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA................................................................ i<br>
<br>TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................................... ...................... vii <br>
<br>OPINIONS BELOW ................................................... .......................................... 1<br>
<br> JURISDICTION .................................................................................................. 1 <br>INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 1<br>
<br>BACKGROUND.....................................................................................................2<br>
<br>FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND........................................... 2<br>
<br>STATEMENT OF THE CASE....................................................................1..to..55<br>
<br>APPENDIX................................................................................................57 to 308<br>
<br>TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.....................................................................iv to vii<br>
<br>S. 484 BRING THEM HOME ALIVE....................................................................................................................2<br>
<br>9.11 PARTICULAR RIGHTS—FIRST AMENDMENT—"CITIZEN" PLAINTIFF 42 U.S.C.§1983..................................................................................3<br>
<br>22 U.S.C § 2451 - Pub. L 87-256§ 101, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat.527.....................4<br>
<br> 22 U.S.C. § 7103. Pub. L. 106–386, div. A, § 105.
Oct. 28, 2000-114 Stat. 1473..................................................................................5<br>
<br> 22. U.S.C§ 2403.Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, § 644, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. <br> 461..........5<br>
<br> 18 U.S.C§ 2381, June 25,1948,Ch.645, 62 Stat 807; Pub L 103-322.....................6<br>
<br> 10 U.S.C § 2733.[a] Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 153;
Pub. L. 85–729........................................................................................... ........... 6<br>
<br> 22 U.S.C§§1571_1604. Pub. L 329-81st Congress, 63 Stat 714
December 23, 1950...........................................................................................7<br>
<br> H.R.5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963...................................................... 7<br>
<br> H.R.7885- Pub. L, 88-205. Approved. December 16, 1963.............................8<br>
<br> 22 USC§ 2151 Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, § 101, formerly § 102, Sept4,1961......10<br>
<br> 22 USC§ 2151n- Human Rights and development Assistance
December 20, 1975.........................................................................................10<br>
<br> 5 U.S.C. §702
<br> 1 USC§ 112a United States Treaties.- Sept. 23, 1950..................................14<br>
<br> 1 USC§ 112-General Provision-July 30, 1947..............................................15<br>
<br> 1 USC§ 112b. United States International agreement-Aug. 22, 1972..........16<br>
<br> 37 U.S.C§ 552; Sep. 6,1966..........................................................................16<br>
<br> 5 U.S.C. § 552a-December 31,1974............................................................. 17<br>
<br> 38 U.S.C. § 101-Definitions. Sep.2, 1958.....................................................18<br>
<br> 38 U.S.C. §§ 1116-1311-Feb. 6, 1991-.........................................................18<br>
<br> 1 U.S.C. § 113
<br> California Civil Code§§§ 44,45a, and 46-Defamation, Libel, Slander......25<br>
<br> §46 Division1. person [38-86]....................................................................26<br>
<br> 42 U.S.C. § 1395- Prohibition against any Federal interference;
Aug. 14, 1935............................................................................................26<br>
<br> 17 U.S.C. § 1203 Civil remedies; Oct. 28, 1998......................................27<br>
<br> 17 U.S.C. § 411-Registration and Civil infringement action;
Oct. 19, 1976............................................................................................29<br>
<br> 42 U.S.C. §12101- Findings and purpose; July 26, 1990........................31<br>
<br> CACI Nos. 3940-3949-DAMAGES-.......................................................33<br>
<br> CACI No.3949.Punitive Damages_ Individual........................................33<br> <br>
<br> 28 U.S.C. § 1871 Fees; June 25, 1948.....................................................34<br>
<br> 44 U.S.C. § 3507- Public information collection activities;
May 22, 1995............................................................................................36<br>
<br> 5 U.S.C. § 3579-Student loan repayments-..............................................37<br>
<br> S 2040 Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism .......................................39<br>
<br> 50 U.S.C. §4105- Prisoners of War-June 24, 1970;................................40<br>
<br> 50 U.S.C. §4101 Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the
United States; July 3, 1948-....................................................................44<br>
<br> 28 U.S.C. § 1346b-June 25, 1948-.........................................................45<br>
<br> 28 U.S.C. §2671- Definitions-June 25, 1948;........................................46<br>
<br> 28 U.S.C. §2672- Administrative adjustment of Claims;
June 25, 1948.........................................................................................46<br>
<br> 28 U.S.C. §2673- Report to Congress-June 25, 1948............................47<br>
<br> 28 U.S.C. §2674 Liability of United States-June 25, 1948...................47<br>
<br> 28 U.S.C. §2677- Compromise-June 25, 1948......................................48<br>
<br> Amendment XIV...................................................................................49<br>
<br> 22 U.S.C. § 1622 a-U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 22. Transfer of
Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States
to Department of Justice........................................................................49<br>
<br> 22 U.S.C. § 1622 b- Transfer of functions.............................................49<br>
<br> 22 U.S.C. § 1622c- Membership of Foreign Claims.............................50<br>
<br> 22 U.S.C. § 1622d- Appointment and compensation............................51<br>
<br> 22 U.S.C. § 1622e- Vesting of all non-adjudicatory.............................52<br>
<br> 22 U.S.C. § 1622f-Foreign Relations and Intercourse- March 14, 1980............ ..52<br>
<br> 22 U.S.C. § 1622 g-Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement .......................52<br>
<br> 18 U.S.C. § 2340A- Torture..................................................................53<br>
On Tuesday, September 18, 2018, 12:13:27 PM PDT, Xavier Becerra <xavier@xavierbecerra.com> wrote:
Add a comment...
49
33
Post has attachment
Rachel Jeantel’s lack of literacy is a societal problem: http://wtim.es/11Ricux

Mike McCallion: If there is still any doubt on your opinion about the Deliberate Activities by the U.S.A. Bureaucracy Class to create problems of interfering with the Trump Administration; remember the Bureaucracy of all Nations wants to maintain the Status Quo
Stop relying on the Central Canada Media versions of Political Reality. Especially the Bought & Controlled CBC. Reach out for the Truth, Canadians.
Keeping the Status Quo means there is a recognizable "place holder" for specific Bureaucrat Mandarin Class members. They are supposedly to be Non-Political and never to expect to maintain the Same High Level Authority if the Elected Political Party changes from one Party to another. Reality the Non-Political aspect of Bureaucrats changes to __ Loyalty to the Bureaucrat Mandarin Class __ and Their own sinecure salary & benefits.
The U.S.A Real Americans have fought back and elected a Political Leader who is not only capable of managing Large & Complex opereartions around the World, but is immune to Bureaucrat wants._ Although not as vulnerable as the Standard Political Class He can be interfered with by the incredible power the Bureaucracy has with contolling the The Tax-Funding. This is what has been going on since Donald Trump became a Candidate for President. He did not immediately follow the Professional Cottage Industry, very high paid minions, which tells the Standard Politicians what they have to say and do, to get the "Big Political Donor Group" support which want Bureaucrat access to the Tax-Funds.
The Standard Political Class___which includes; the Smearedia__ the Lobby Crony __the University Greedy Administration & Lazy Professors ___The Union Leadership and The "big Business ___ and the Oil Cartel (s) both Opec & American Domestic Oil Crony, Rockefeller- Bush Family and many others. All of these tax-funded groupies as venal & corrupt as the Hollywood and Music Business parasites who do not give a fecund thought about "We the People".
"We the People" means; There is a Social Contract between the Government and the Ordinary Citizens as the Sovereign. The people who work hard, pay their Fair amount of Taxes without finding ways to not pay Taxes; Raise and Educate the Next Generation; to Understand & Move this "Great Experiment" of self-government onto the next level of Civilization. Creating advances to improve the Life of All People in the World.
This is the Fear__ of the self-serving Bureaucrat Class. ____The election of Donald J. Trump as POTUS # 45 put all of the Self-Serving Bureaucrats on notice; Start doing Your Oaths of Office and provide Support for_ "We the People"__ The Sovereign of the United States of America.
Canadians; ___You live in a Country which was established as a ready made Bureaucrat Country._ A sewn together of Two Nations with a Distant Ritual Sovereign as the Final arbitrator to mend the stitching when it unravels._ Unravel it will, eventually.__ One of the greatest Human's in establishing the Advance of Civilization for all People in the World; The Great Emancipator of the North American Continent __Abraham Lincoln__ declared it as the Truth for all Time. ___A Nation divided cannot stand for long. __ North America is the bastion of Freedom for all Nations with the elimination of Slavery. The only Continent to have completed the elimination of Slavery. There may still be isolated instances of cruel Individuals establishing a Slavery situation in North America, but there is no Wink & Nod acceptance of the Culture of slavery.
The American Sovereign and the Canadian Culture removed the Indigenous People of North America keeping of Slaves and after a Bloody War of Attrition and deaths of well over 600,000 young men, the Slavery brought to North America by the European Cultures were removed._ The European Cultures under a Renewed Bureaucracy Control of the European Union is reinstalling the Slavery Premise through encouraged and unfettered acceptance of "islamic gender apartheid". ___The less controlling National Bureaucrats, returning to the Wink & Nod of Slavery as they succumb to the control of the European Union Supreme Bureaucrat as Sovereign.
The Remnant Magna Carta British have tried to move out from the Domination of the European Union Bureaucracy; but the British Bureaucracy and their Supine Political Party Elected Officials have let the "Wink & Nod" to Slavery invade and dominate the Political & Bureaucrat. Class to where it appears the Only Answer will be another "Great Revolution" similar to 1650's, the difference being the local populace in the Police-No Go Zones - will be doing the beheading not the Government Bureaucrats.
Give Donald J. Trump His due respect. So far He has batted back the U.S.A. Bureaucrat control of the "We the People" to a standstill. Help Him do not hinder Him; it is what Fredercik Douglas said about Black Slaves prior to the American Civil War & Martin Luther King Jr. said during the Civil Rights Era of the Sixties.
Stop relying on the Central Canada Media versions of Political Reality. Especially the Bought & Controlled CBC. Reach out for the Truth, Canadians.
Keeping the Status Quo means there is a recognizable "place holder" for specific Bureaucrat Mandarin Class members. They are supposedly to be Non-Political and never to expect to maintain the Same High Level Authority if the Elected Political Party changes from one Party to another. Reality the Non-Political aspect of Bureaucrats changes to __ Loyalty to the Bureaucrat Mandarin Class __ and Their own sinecure salary & benefits.
The U.S.A Real Americans have fought back and elected a Political Leader who is not only capable of managing Large & Complex opereartions around the World, but is immune to Bureaucrat wants._ Although not as vulnerable as the Standard Political Class He can be interfered with by the incredible power the Bureaucracy has with contolling the The Tax-Funding. This is what has been going on since Donald Trump became a Candidate for President. He did not immediately follow the Professional Cottage Industry, very high paid minions, which tells the Standard Politicians what they have to say and do, to get the "Big Political Donor Group" support which want Bureaucrat access to the Tax-Funds.
The Standard Political Class___which includes; the Smearedia__ the Lobby Crony __the University Greedy Administration & Lazy Professors ___The Union Leadership and The "big Business ___ and the Oil Cartel (s) both Opec & American Domestic Oil Crony, Rockefeller- Bush Family and many others. All of these tax-funded groupies as venal & corrupt as the Hollywood and Music Business parasites who do not give a fecund thought about "We the People".
"We the People" means; There is a Social Contract between the Government and the Ordinary Citizens as the Sovereign. The people who work hard, pay their Fair amount of Taxes without finding ways to not pay Taxes; Raise and Educate the Next Generation; to Understand & Move this "Great Experiment" of self-government onto the next level of Civilization. Creating advances to improve the Life of All People in the World.
This is the Fear__ of the self-serving Bureaucrat Class. ____The election of Donald J. Trump as POTUS # 45 put all of the Self-Serving Bureaucrats on notice; Start doing Your Oaths of Office and provide Support for_ "We the People"__ The Sovereign of the United States of America.
Canadians; ___You live in a Country which was established as a ready made Bureaucrat Country._ A sewn together of Two Nations with a Distant Ritual Sovereign as the Final arbitrator to mend the stitching when it unravels._ Unravel it will, eventually.__ One of the greatest Human's in establishing the Advance of Civilization for all People in the World; The Great Emancipator of the North American Continent __Abraham Lincoln__ declared it as the Truth for all Time. ___A Nation divided cannot stand for long. __ North America is the bastion of Freedom for all Nations with the elimination of Slavery. The only Continent to have completed the elimination of Slavery. There may still be isolated instances of cruel Individuals establishing a Slavery situation in North America, but there is no Wink & Nod acceptance of the Culture of slavery.
The American Sovereign and the Canadian Culture removed the Indigenous People of North America keeping of Slaves and after a Bloody War of Attrition and deaths of well over 600,000 young men, the Slavery brought to North America by the European Cultures were removed._ The European Cultures under a Renewed Bureaucracy Control of the European Union is reinstalling the Slavery Premise through encouraged and unfettered acceptance of "islamic gender apartheid". ___The less controlling National Bureaucrats, returning to the Wink & Nod of Slavery as they succumb to the control of the European Union Supreme Bureaucrat as Sovereign.
The Remnant Magna Carta British have tried to move out from the Domination of the European Union Bureaucracy; but the British Bureaucracy and their Supine Political Party Elected Officials have let the "Wink & Nod" to Slavery invade and dominate the Political & Bureaucrat. Class to where it appears the Only Answer will be another "Great Revolution" similar to 1650's, the difference being the local populace in the Police
Give Donald J. Trump His due respect. So far He has batted back the U.S.A. Bureaucrat control of the "We the People" to a standstill. Help Him do not hinder Him; it is what Fredercik Douglas said about Black Slaves prior to the American Civil War & Martin Luther King Jr. said during the Civil Rights Era of the Sixties.
Add a comment...
26
9
Post has attachment
Obama blamed for NSA spying revelations by whistleblower advocate group - Read more: http://wtim.es/11UD0Qf
He said currently “there is no recourse” for national-security workers like Mr. Snowden who believe they are witnessing abusive government practices.
Is the President the one to blame? How much responsibility should fall on the Obama administration?
He said currently “there is no recourse” for national-security workers like Mr. Snowden who believe they are witnessing abusive government practices.
Is the President the one to blame? How much responsibility should fall on the Obama administration?

bernard louis liberto: Hey here is something to think about the military performs skirmishes all
the time living i the era there and abouts, when vietnam was on, and the
phrases from every acting street bum, miking their prey dope smokers and
drug dealers, and rabelious poo;le, petty commissions they were called to
keep the peace, and control protests is this educated theory, that vietnam
waas merelyh a skirmish designed to float past the issues of tehn the
Arabia wars, alignements with disinformaitons unwated by teh most americans
yet the military some of the most powerful ones got their ways as it was
illegal to disinform anyon of pendings mitary threats to the nations, in
america however the alginemtns between the imosing biriths desired much
disinformai=tios upon the north americans a once civilized place that
respected civil right smuch more than today, littel surveilances nd hight=er
trust and cetainly more concern for the basics needs upheld like food and
place to lve without paying so much, and resepct fo rht erights of mind, no
psychiatry waas ever accetped socialsim is not a goo dthig, so with that
the british, and their comenced wsrs and reverting to avoid stimulated
then, Loreas divisions and skkirmissh os f fire began again between north
amend south korea, 197os late, after JohnMcain alomst startd www2 by
shooting sdwon a noncombatant allie to peaace int eh rgions of Arabia,
little now is spoiken of it and certainly since he became sentaror, many
are rolling in their graves; the subtefur=ges set up by biriths forces whom
neither wishsed americas involcve to give peace to Korea and both ends,
becasuee they used it for a lever of derffarl to warfare in the pas=cific a
cause of theirpredominat presences, well not only idi th epritish conive to
algin itw=selof with some members of poor willed memebers of america w=whom
went t=with the flow of atniamerican assistences John MCcain conveneed
himslef to help ut their canadian counterparts to align that we all eat
forzen foods from his cousingns
the time living i the era there and abouts, when vietnam was on, and the
phrases from every acting street bum, miking their prey dope smokers and
drug dealers, and rabelious poo;le, petty commissions they were called to
keep the peace, and control protests is this educated theory, that vietnam
waas merelyh a skirmish designed to float past the issues of tehn the
Arabia wars, alignements with disinformaitons unwated by teh most americans
yet the military some of the most powerful ones got their ways as it was
illegal to disinform anyon of pendings mitary threats to the nations, in
america however the alginemtns between the imosing biriths desired much
disinformai=tios upon the north americans a once civilized place that
respected civil right smuch more than today, littel surveilances nd hight=er
trust and cetainly more concern for the basics needs upheld like food and
place to lve without paying so much, and resepct fo rht erights of mind, no
psychiatry waas ever accetped socialsim is not a goo dthig, so with that
the british, and their comenced wsrs and reverting to avoid stimulated
then, Loreas divisions and skkirmissh os f fire began again between north
amend south korea, 197os late, after JohnMcain alomst startd www2 by
shooting sdwon a noncombatant allie to peaace int eh rgions of Arabia,
little now is spoiken of it and certainly since he became sentaror, many
are rolling in their graves; the subtefur=ges set up by biriths forces whom
neither wishsed americas involcve to give peace to Korea and both ends,
becasuee they used it for a lever of derffarl to warfare in the pas=cific a
cause of theirpredominat presences, well not only idi th epritish conive to
algin itw=selof with some members of poor willed memebers of america w=whom
went t=with the flow of atniamerican assistences John MCcain conveneed
himslef to help ut their canadian counterparts to align that we all eat
forzen foods from his cousingns
Add a comment...
34
17
Post has attachment
NRA gives lifetime membership to boy suspended for Pop-Tart gun - Read more: http://wtim.es/ZwU9Fb
How do you think the NRA handled this situation? How many LIKES can we get to support Josh?
How do you think the NRA handled this situation? How many LIKES can we get to support Josh?

Add a comment...
34
7
Post has attachment
No tours for public, but White House still open for Hollywood VIPs - Read more: http://wtim.es/12vk64E
Do celebrities deserve better treatment then everyone else? How do you feel about the White House only being opened to the "privileged"?
Do celebrities deserve better treatment then everyone else? How do you feel about the White House only being opened to the "privileged"?

Add a comment...
33
18
Post has attachment
The Cleveland man who made headlines with his rescue of three women from his neighbor's home was awarded a year’s worth of free food at McDonald's. It seems "heroes eat Big Macs.” http://wtim.es/1aeSX8P
Nice gesture or exploitive marketing strategy? Where would you like to eat free for a year?
Nice gesture or exploitive marketing strategy? Where would you like to eat free for a year?

Add a comment...
26
5
Post has attachment
Sen. John Cornyn: ‘Past time’ for Eric Holder to go - Read more: http://wtim.es/15YRjf4
How do you think the latest scandals reflect on Eric Holder? Is it time for the president to appoint somebody who the public can have confidence in?
How do you think the latest scandals reflect on Eric Holder? Is it time for the president to appoint somebody who the public can have confidence in?

Bright Quang: +spooky one
Add a comment...
17
5
Broadest gun ban in two decades clears Senate committee http://ow.ly/iVH1e
Furdanan Megellieand: really reaching demwitocrats an article, anti-gun, that failed in 2013 the same year this was posted originally. reaching much? ah der der der
Mark Plenn: +Mark Plenn +Furdanan Megellieand the libards who talk of stealing the legal guns from non-criminal citizens are like ostriches with their heads burried in the ground. Criminals by their nature don't obey the law, so what makes the libards think that criminals will obey new gun statutes?
Add a comment...
14
1
Add a comment...
12
2
U.S. diplomat calls for international action in Congo http://wtim.es/Y5AVik
Akube Ndoromo: HOW THE JUDGE HELPED THE PROSECUTOR AFTER BOTH BEING BRIBED AND THE DEFENSE LAWYER REMAINED SILENT COMMITTING PERJURY.
Appeal No. 08-3026: Filed Appeal No. 07-5370): Appeal No. 07 3U8t. Criminal No. 1: 06-cr-00019-EGS; Akube W. Ndoromo Petitioner vs. United States of American Respondent.
"The Court (Judge Emmett G. Sullivan Defense lawyer Rita Pendry): Actually, I have money laundering, false statements related to health care the wire fraud. What we have done is kind of tracking the language of statute for the healthcare fraud and false statement related to healthcare matters. I don’t know if you have something more comprehensive than that or not. I can show you both what we have. There wasn’t anything really in the red book or the federal practice book. Mr. Austin (Roy Austin Jr. US Government Prosecutor): I will get the Court and defense counsel something. Probably right after the lunch".
After lunch the court took over and altered the case and send Akube Ndoromo to prison.
"The court: no need to send what back? Mr. Austin: The indictment back. I’ll leave it up to the court. The Court: I think I said I would send the indictment back. Actually, everything is in the instruction and the verdict form. And, again, it is not evidence, but it is laid out all the counts, as to what the charges are. So you won’t. The court: counsel, we may have to make a change to those two counts that allege interstate commerce. The last sentence, if you find beyond a reasonable doubt that Medicaid was a healthcare. Mr. Austin: what page? The Court: I’m sorry, 26. The last sentence If you find beyond a reasonable doubt that Medicaid was a healthcare benefit program effecting interstate or foreign commerce, then the first element of the crime is satisfied. The Court: And that will be change with respect to his healthcare fraud and false statement. I’ll just change that language to mean then the commerce element of the crime is satisfied or that portion of the crime is satisfied. The Court: all right. If you turn to page 39, probably 39 of yours, the last sentence, again, it just needs to be consistent. Mr. Austin: That sounds right. The court: do you see that? It’s very complicated but Christie has been wrestling with these things longer than any of us".
Appeal No. 08-3026: Filed Appeal No. 07-5370): Appeal No. 07 3U8t. Criminal No. 1: 06-cr-00019-EGS; Akube W. Ndoromo Petitioner vs. United States of American Respondent.
Akube Ndoromo. Please you can Google up by "Who is Akube Ndoromo" or the Appeal Numbers..
Judge Emmet G. Sullivan next openings for term law clerks are in January 2019 and January 2020, the point is USA going to allow this corrupted Judge EGS to continue with his illegally ways of accepting bribes?
Appeal No. 08-3026: Filed Appeal No. 07-5370): Appeal No. 07 3U8t. Criminal No. 1: 06-cr-00019-EGS; Akube W. Ndoromo Petitioner vs. United States of American Respondent.
"The Court (Judge Emmett G. Sullivan Defense lawyer Rita Pendry): Actually, I have money laundering, false statements related to health care the wire fraud. What we have done is kind of tracking the language of statute for the healthcare fraud and false statement related to healthcare matters. I don’t know if you have something more comprehensive than that or not. I can show you both what we have. There wasn’t anything really in the red book or the federal practice book. Mr. Austin (Roy Austin Jr. US Government Prosecutor): I will get the Court and defense counsel something. Probably right after the lunch".
After lunch the court took over and altered the case and send Akube Ndoromo to prison.
"The court: no need to send what back? Mr. Austin: The indictment back. I’ll leave it up to the court. The Court: I think I said I would send the indictment back. Actually, everything is in the instruction and the verdict form. And, again, it is not evidence, but it is laid out all the counts, as to what the charges are. So you won’t. The court: counsel, we may have to make a change to those two counts that allege interstate commerce. The last sentence, if you find beyond a reasonable doubt that Medicaid was a healthcare. Mr. Austin: what page? The Court: I’m sorry, 26. The last sentence If you find beyond a reasonable doubt that Medicaid was a healthcare benefit program effecting interstate or foreign commerce, then the first element of the crime is satisfied. The Court: And that will be change with respect to his healthcare fraud and false statement. I’ll just change that language to mean then the commerce element of the crime is satisfied or that portion of the crime is satisfied. The Court: all right. If you turn to page 39, probably 39 of yours, the last sentence, again, it just needs to be consistent. Mr. Austin: That sounds right. The court: do you see that? It’s very complicated but Christie has been wrestling with these things longer than any of us".
Appeal No. 08-3026: Filed Appeal No. 07-5370): Appeal No. 07 3U8t. Criminal No. 1: 06-cr-00019-EGS; Akube W. Ndoromo Petitioner vs. United States of American Respondent.
Akube Ndoromo. Please you can Google up by "Who is Akube Ndoromo" or the Appeal Numbers..
Judge Emmet G. Sullivan next openings for term law clerks are in January 2019 and January 2020, the point is USA going to allow this corrupted Judge EGS to continue with his illegally ways of accepting bribes?
Frank Clark: +Akube Ndoromo
Add a comment...
12
2
Looks like you've reached the end
Looks like you've reached the end
Unable to load more. Retry
Wait while more posts are being loaded

