The amount of evidence saying 1 thing versus the amount of evidence saying another.
Then to the credibility of few sources versus the credibility of MANY sources.
Plus having witnessed the tragedy with my own eyes.
I know which conclusion I subscribe to.
The conspiracy nuts telling ME to do research need to learn what confirmation bias means.
I have followed the links saying the crew survived. Have YOU followed the many numerous links saying they haven't?
All of the investigative reports, the recovery of the debris, the search for the remains, the conclusions of the autopsies, the highly publicized search for the remains of Gregory Jarvis by colleague Robert Crippen.
That is A LOT of entities that would have to have been complicit in a cover-up this big, and logic dictates the fallacy of believing something of that scope to actually be truthful.
Not to mention any site saying "Truth" this or that on the INTERNET needs to be vetted thoroughly as their credibility IS a factor in these arguments.
So ad hominem is in play here.
Anybody reading http://aplanetruth.info/2015/04/23/breaking-news-theyre-alive-challenger-space-shuttle-crew-safe-and-employed
and taking this argument seriously needs to really learn what logical fallacies are because that is ALL this site uses to lead to a false conclusion.