I get variants on this question at least once a week in the genetics category. I'm slowly building a generic form letter as an answer. I'd appreciate feedback from my science readers on clarity and if I've said outright wrong things.
_Questioner: Expectant Mother
Subject: What will our baby look like?
Question (This week)
My husband and I are goofing off with our family members and guessing what our lovely little baby girl will look like when she is born. Both husband and myself have light skin. I have hazel green eyes, and hubby has blue. I have light to medium brown hair with an auburn undertone. Hubby has blonde hair, with red(almost orange) facial hair. His mom is a natural red head, and his dad has black hair. My mother has red hair, and my father has brown hair. I was born with jet black hair and hubby was born with strawberry blonde hair. Can you give us an idea of what our little girl will look like?_
Hello Expectant Mother! Congratulations on your pregnancy!
First, some quick notes on how inheritance works. When you make egg cells, your body takes all your genes, shuffles them like cards, and then deals out one-half a deck to each egg cell. Guys do the same thing with sperm cells. When a baby is made, your and your significant other's DNA half-decks are combined to make a full deck of genes for each child. The number of cards (genes) is fixed. However, the pictures on the cards are not 'one of two' pictures. Really, human inheritance has many possible pictures for each card number. We call different pictures in each card position 'alleles'.
But what about hair or eye color?
Human pigmentation is something we don't understand all that well yet genetically. If we imagine a person as a factory, there is a whole department in the factory dedicated to producing the two known pigment genes for skin and hair, eumelanin (brownish) and pheomelanin (reddish). There are also support staff that indicate when the pigment is produced, how it is delivered, and where it goes, as well as how much the workers make. All of these factors are also controlled by DNA variations and genes. What color we see at the end is a summation of the entire department's efforts, which could be ten or more genes for skin. It’s at least six for eyes. Also, the instructions on what to make varies over time given how old the person is. For example, most often people's hair darkens at maturity, then grays at seniority, but this is not a hard and fast rule.
It sounds like there's a lot of pheomelanin in your family. I'd be surprised if your baby didn't at least have some red in his or her hair. Beyond that it's hard to tell. Personally, I started out with black hair as a newborn, then faded to honey-blonde like my mother, then darkened to a milk chocolate brown in my 30s. My father started out white-blond and then darkened to dark chocolate brown in his late 20s. My mother remains honey-blonde. You never know. :)
There are six genes that pool together to make eye pigment; if you have very little pigment, you end up blue or gray. If you have lots, you get a dark brown eye. If you have hazel-green eyes, and your boyfriend blue, the rule of thumb is you have a 50/50 chance that any kid you have will have blue eyes or hazel eyes. This is because each child inherits three genes for eye color from each parent, and each gene is an on/off. it's largely - but not always - governed by how much total pigment is made. Blue is least pigment, while green or hazel is an intermediate amount. Usually these pigment genes assort together; it takes some unlikely combinations to produce green eyes. Lucky you!
Ultimately, genetics are funny. Your child may look like you, like your husband, like your father, or like his mother. Your baby will be a combination of you and your spouse's best qualities. You never know until you see it, so try to enjoy the mystery!
There's a lot to read out there. Hopefully what I told you makes sense. Please feel free to come back if you have more questions.
Actually, one of my colleagues pointed out once that our research area is very violent. Some very important sets often examined are called annihilators, and we talk about elements killing other elements. Part of my research entails proving that annihilators of certain sets are also annihilators of other sets.
Because that’s when it clicked, and I understood what it was really about: being able to make our own decisions about what happens to our bodies. How fundamentally important it is to maintain, at the very minimum in terms of human rights, the sense of autonomy and self-possession in regards to your own physical body. How much an absolute violation and affront, an act of violence even, it is to have someone else, particularly an abstracted state, start telling you that your body is going to have to have this or that happen to it, and you don’t get a say in the matter.
is also exactly the problem with the "War on Drugs": The state and its licensed-but-leashed agents get to dictate how much pain you must suffer should you be unfortunate enough to develop or contract a painful illness or disorder. You personally get little to no say in how much, IF ANY, pain relief you are to be allocated.
Hrrm. I don't really think so; the notion of picking up a spider and petting it still feels creepy. ;) But playing with the proteins in the lab, now that I could get behind! :D
- LoneStar College MontgomeryAdjunct Faculty, 2015 - presentAdjunct Instructor in Biology
- University of Texas Health Science Center, San AntonioPostdoctoral Researcher, 2009 - 2014
Can we move beyond these stories?
Why is it that most public debates on science education have yet to move far beyond the Scopes Monkey Trial, or fluoridation of water? Everyone agrees that science education is good for kids. Why does it feel like people lose the sense that how the world and our bodies work is relevant beyond middle school? Our current mantra of 'get 'em young' may help fuel scientific dreams and dreamers, but begs the question of how to support those dreams. Children cannot vote, and a society who deems science irrelevant at best and dangerous at worst is unlikely to see immediate benefit from increased research and science education budgets.
We don't need the TV to tell us the truth is out there. We can find undiscovered truths with our own two hands, in our own backyards.
- University of Massachusetts Medical SchoolBiomedical Science, 2001 - 2008
Physics: Semiconductors., atomic number 32, atomic number 6
atomic number 32, atomic number 6, dope silicon: NO, you can t just replace one element with another and YES it s already been done (not sim
Black Phoenix Alchemy Lab: Potions, Perfumes, and Esoteric Brews
Purveyors of gothic, Renaissance, and Medieval themed potions, aromatherapy blends, bath and body products, and herbal household accoutremen