What I really hope happens is that the American public see how much the media has failed us. And then some of the media maligned Nate Silver because he did his math. He didn't need bells and whistles to entertain us. He just used math to tell us what would probably happen. It just so happens that it happened. Some the media looks like a ship of fools.
The article makes a fair point - especially invoking the "Unskewed Polls" model. But in addition to the fallibility of those creating the models you have plenty of time to interpret the outcome of those models. Pundits will say what those numbers mean. They will note what the public is thinking to generate those numbers. They will discuss what Candidate X needs to do to either maintain or change those numbers. And there will still be some who will confidently explain why this year, the numbers are all wrong. We will also see new "unskewed" polling models.