Profile

Cover photo
Suvinay Subramanian
Attends Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
Lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
690 followers|146,095 views
AboutPostsPhotosVideos

Stream

Suvinay Subramanian

Shared publicly  - 
 
Introducing the latex-therefore package. For your mathematical writing convenience. No more searching on thesaurus.com and synonym.com! Find the appropriate replacement for all your "therefore"s with this go-to package. Shock and awe your readers with gems such as:
1. Wherefore said he unto them.
2. It pleases the symmetry of the world that.
5
5
Sivaramakrishnan Swaminathan's profile photoNachikethas A J's profile photoMohan K.V's profile photoTerri Palmer's profile photo
 
+Sivaramakrishnan Swaminathan  Since you went the dark-social way, I shall reveal this gem to the other side, lest it fade away into obscurity :p
Add a comment...

Suvinay Subramanian

Shared publicly  - 
 
 
(VIDEO) Tesla Motors to build national network of free charging stations.

[Read this and watch. This is literally the most important news story of the year, if not the decade or century.]

Tesla Motors co-founder Elon Musk said there are three reasons people don't view electric cars as practical. Then he proceeded to solve each one.

1) "The range is too short."  His new super charger will give high-end Teslas a 150 mile trip on a 30 minute charge. "You could drive for three hours, stop at a rest area and recharge for 30 minutes and be ready to go again." There are six stations already deployed in California. "This is not some figment of imagination that may be happening at some point in the future. We built these up in secret and we are unveiling them for the first time tonight...Within two years we will cover almost the entire United States with Super Chargers. You'll be able to travel practically anywhere. Our long-term goal is (within 4-5 years) to cover the entire United States and the lower part of Canada." Europe and eventually the entire world are planned as well.

2) "You are just burning fuel at a power plant instead of the car."  The super chargers will be powered by solar panels from Solar City and "are designed to generate more power than required for the cars so the Super Chargers will actually put more power into the grid than the cars use."

3) "Electric vehicles are trendy but too expensive and not worth it."  The Tesla Model S cars equipped with the Super Charging technology will be able to use the stations at no cost. "You'll be able to travel for free, forever on pure sunlight. It's pretty hard to beat that. Free long distance? You're not going to be able to get that with gasoline."

At the start of his talk, a Tesla was plugged in. At the conclusion of his 10 minute presentation it had gained enough charge to drive 50 miles. From sunlight. For free.

Video Description: Elon Musk introduces the Tesla Supercharger and the first part of a national network which will allow the Model S electric car to travel long distances with ultra fast charging. With the Superchargers' power supplied by solar energy, Tesla continues to move automotive transit towards a much more sustainable future.

+Vic Gundotra 
5
2
Rama Krishna Simhadri's profile photoKashyap Garimella's profile photo
 
This is superb! I bought an electric scooter and these questions like "You are just burning fuel at a power plant instead of the car" come to my mind very often. I wish they do the same in India :).
Add a comment...

Suvinay Subramanian

Shared publicly  - 
 
 
Dizzying but invisible depth

You just went to the Google home page.

Simple, isn't it?

What just actually happened?

Well, when you know a bit of about how browsers work, it's not quite that simple. You've just put into play HTTP, HTML, CSS, ECMAscript, and more. Those are actually such incredibly complex technologies that they'll make any engineer dizzy if they think about them too much, and such that no single company can deal with that entire complexity.

Let's simplify.

You just connected your computer to www.google.com.

Simple, isn't it?

What just actually happened?

Well, when you know a bit about how networks work, it's not quite that simple. You've just put into play DNS, TCP, UDP, IP, Wifi, Ethernet, DOCSIS, OC, SONET, and more. Those are actually such incredibly complex technologies that they'll make any engineer dizzy if they think about them too much, and such that no single company can deal with that entire complexity.

Let's simplify.

You just typed www.google.com in the location bar of your browser.

Simple, isn't it?

What just actually happened?

Well, when you know a bit about how operating systems work, it's not quite that simple. You've just put into play a kernel, a USB host stack, an input dispatcher, an event handler, a font hinter, a sub-pixel rasterizer, a windowing system, a graphics driver, and more, all of those written in high-level languages that get processed by compilers, linkers, optimizers, interpreters, and more. Those are actually such incredibly complex technologies that they'll make any engineer dizzy if they think about them too much, and such that no single company can deal with that entire complexity.

Let's simplify.

You just pressed a key on your keyboard.

Simple, isn't it?

What just actually happened?

Well, when you know about bit about how input peripherals work, it's not quite that simple. You've just put into play a power regulator, a debouncer, an input multiplexer, a USB device stack, a USB hub stack, all of that implemented in a single chip. That chip is built around thinly sliced wafers of highly purified single-crystal silicon ingot, doped with minute quantities of other atoms that are blasted into the crystal structure, interconnected with multiple layers of aluminum or copper, that are deposited according to patterns of high-energy ultraviolet light that are focused to a precision of a fraction of a micron, connected to the outside world via thin gold wires, all inside a packaging made of a dimensionally and thermally stable resin. The doping patterns and the interconnects implement transistors, which are grouped together to create logic gates. In some parts of the chip, logic gates are combined to create arithmetic and bitwise functions, which are combined to create an ALU. In another part of the chip, logic gates are combined into bistable loops, which are lined up into rows, which are combined with selectors to create a register bank. In another part of the chip, logic gates are combined into bus controllers and instruction decoders and microcode to create an execution scheduler. In another part of the chip, they're combined into address and data multiplexers and timing circuitry to create a memory controller. There's even more. Those are actually such incredibly complex technologies that they'll make any engineer dizzy if they think about them too much, and such that no single company can deal with that entire complexity.

Can we simplify further?

In fact, very scarily, no, we can't. We can barely comprehend the complexity of a single chip in a computer keyboard, and yet there's no simpler level. The next step takes us to the software that is used to design the chip's logic, and that software itself has a level of complexity that requires to go back to the top of the loop.

Today's computers are so complex that they can only be designed and manufactured with slightly less complex computers. In turn the computers used for the design and manufacture are so complex that they themselves can only be designed and manufactured with slightly less complex computers. You'd have to go through many such loops to get back to a level that could possibly be re-built from scratch.

Once you start to understand how our modern devices work and how they're created, it's impossible to not be dizzy about the depth of everything that's involved, and to not be in awe about the fact that they work at all, when Murphy's law says that they simply shouldn't possibly work.

For non-technologists, this is all a black box. That is a great success of technology: all those layers of complexity are entirely hidden and people can use them without even knowing that they exist at all. That is the reason why many people can find computers so frustrating to use: there are so many things that can possibly go wrong that some of them inevitably will, but the complexity goes so deep that it's impossible for most users to be able to do anything about any error.

That is also why it's so hard for technologists and non-technologists to communicate together: technologists know too much about too many layers and non-technologists know too little about too few layers to be able to establish effective direct communication. The gap is so large that it's not even possible any more to have a single person be an intermediate between those two groups, and that's why e.g. we end up with those convoluted technical support call centers and their multiple tiers. Without such deep support structures, you end up with the frustrating situation that we see when end users have access to a bug database that is directly used by engineers: neither the end users nor the engineers get the information that they need to accomplish their goals.

That is why the mainstream press and the general population has talked so much about Steve Jobs' death and comparatively so little about Dennis Ritchie's: Steve's influence was at a layer that most people could see, while Dennis' was much deeper. On the one hand, I can imagine where the computing world would be without the work that Jobs did and the people he inspired: probably a bit less shiny, a bit more beige, a bit more square. Deep inside, though, our devices would still work the same way and do the same things. On the other hand, I literally can't imagine where the computing world would be without the work that Ritchie did and the people he inspired. By the mid 80s, Ritchie's influence had taken over, and even back then very little remained of the pre-Ritchie world.

Finally, last but not least, that is why our patent system is broken: technology has done such an amazing job at hiding its complexity that the people regulating and running the patent system are barely even aware of the complexity of what they're regulating and running. That's the ultimate bikeshedding: just like the proverbial discussions in the town hall about a nuclear power plant end up being about the paint color for the plant's bike shed, the patent discussions about modern computing systems end up being about screen sizes and icon ordering, because in both cases those are the only aspect that the people involved in the discussion are capable of discussing, even though they are irrelevant to the actual function of the overall system being discussed.

CC:BY 3.0
3
Add a comment...

Suvinay Subramanian

Shared publicly  - 
 
 
Introducing the Secure Shell app - a terminal emulator and stand-alone ssh client for Chrome OS, as well as Chrome for Windows, OS X, and Linux. No need for external proxies! Learn more at http://goo.gl/0Kqxt
Terminal emulator and SSH client.
3
Add a comment...

Suvinay Subramanian

Shared publicly  - 
1
Suvinay Subramanian's profile photoKendra Schwartz's profile photo
3 comments
 
I feel that students that attend ivy league Universities come from families by in large, not all. That value status and pedigree. So when the students come home to tell their parents that they will major in Jewish history their parents tell them no, that's a hobby. Plus universities are so concerned with getting grant money to fund research projects in the science fields that they don't give any money to liberal arts. I heard someone at Duke University once say with all honesty: "what does the social science do for Duke"? Nothing, it is the stats program that brings in most of the money to Duke University. So, the stats program is valued and honored more than history department. Status has a lot to do with money and people who go after status have values that tell them that they need to make 5 million a year as a bond investor. Largely, the science department promotes it too. How many stats PhD's end up working for google? It was funny, at a graduation I went to for my brother every stat person was going off to work in silicon valley for google or yahoo. None, of them wanted to do something to make the world a better place...but only cared about making money and status. Do you think that is true?
Add a comment...

Suvinay Subramanian

Shared publicly  - 
 
The afternoon of May 6, 2010 was among the strangest in economic history. Starting at 2:42 p.m. EDT, the Dow Jones stock index fell 600 poin...
1
Ashwin Sudhakar's profile photo
 
And people thought that it would be armed futuristic robots that would control the world.
Add a comment...
Have him in circles
690 people
Naveen Kartik's profile photo
Pradvay Sivashankar's profile photo
yash reddy's profile photo
Srinivasa Chaitanya Turubati's profile photo
Abhijit Kiran Valluri's profile photo
Vavalam Infomedia (indianlearner.com)'s profile photo
Aritro Biswas's profile photo
Adebiyi Isaac's profile photo
Karthik Govindaraghavan's profile photo

Suvinay Subramanian

Shared publicly  - 
 
Well, I don't really have to add to the Gangnam style phenomenon, but this one features Noam Chomsky \m/.

Did I mention I had dinner with Noam Chomsky few months back :) :)? 

+Gangnam Style the MIT way, featuring +Noam Chomsky, Donald Sadoway and Eric Lander. 
5
David Q. Cohen (SpeedSkaterBoston)'s profile photoSuvinay Subramanian's profile photo
6 comments
 
Ya ya, it was no life-changer. But it was cool enough for me :)
Add a comment...

Suvinay Subramanian

Shared publicly  - 
 
Epic hacking story; reveals just how vulnerable our online portfolios are.
1
Add a comment...

Suvinay Subramanian

Shared publicly  - 
 
Check out the video too!
Recursive Drawing is an exploration of user interface ideas towards the development of a spatially-oriented programming environment. Start Drawing!
1
Mohammed Yusoof's profile photo
 
Its very glad to see a Madrasi in MIT +Suvinay Subramanian
Add a comment...

Suvinay Subramanian

Shared publicly  - 
 
Using peer instruction to teach students - Rethinking how college students learn.
4
1
Kendra Schwartz's profile photoRama Krishna Simhadri's profile photo
 
I read that article, and I honestly think it has good points but I don't want to sound un-pc, but this sounds not very progressive. I think this approach only works if the professors are dedicated to truly teaching and helping students understand. I think a better method would be to have people study topics they want to learn about. This goes back to your earlier post. People need to study something because they are excited and love the topic. I think too much "reason" and "logic" is used for people when making decisions on what to major in. Logic can be used to convince yourself that what you're doing is right. But in reality you have only convinced yourself it is, and it is not really what you want to do.
Add a comment...

Suvinay Subramanian

Shared publicly  - 
 
Your shopping habits reveal even the most personal information — like when you’re going to have a baby.
1
Ashwin Sudhakar's profile photo
 
This is scarily reminding me of a future predicted by Aldous Huxley in his book "The Brave New World Revisited".
Add a comment...

Suvinay Subramanian

Shared publicly  - 
 
Happy Valentine's Day folks!
You might think that the dismal science has very little to offer on matters of the heart. But I disagree. And so does Elisabeth Fosslien. She's a brilliant young analyst interested in design, math...
1
Add a comment...
People
Have him in circles
690 people
Naveen Kartik's profile photo
Pradvay Sivashankar's profile photo
yash reddy's profile photo
Srinivasa Chaitanya Turubati's profile photo
Abhijit Kiran Valluri's profile photo
Vavalam Infomedia (indianlearner.com)'s profile photo
Aritro Biswas's profile photo
Adebiyi Isaac's profile photo
Karthik Govindaraghavan's profile photo
Work
Occupation
PhD student, Computer Science
Places
Map of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has lived
Currently
Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Previously
Chennai/Bangalore - Chennai/Bangalore - Chennai - Bangalore - Trivandrum - Fredericton, Canada
Links
Other profiles
Contributor to
Story
Introduction
Graduate student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
Education
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
    PhD, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2011 - present
  • Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras
    B.Tech, Electrical Engineering, 2007 - 2011
  • Sri Kumran Children's Home CBSE
    2001 - 2007
  • Chettinad Vidyashram
    1994 - 2001
Basic Information
Gender
Male