Profile

Cover photo
Steve Wright (Conches)
Worked at EARN.org
Attended Claremont Graduate University
Lives in Oakland, CA
1,214 followers|1,245,875 views
AboutPosts

Stream

Steve Wright (Conches)

Shared publicly  - 
1

Steve Wright (Conches)

Shared publicly  - 
 
As much as I hate to admit it, in terms of quality engagement, it really feels like G+ is getting worse and Facebook is getting better. +Gideon Rosenblatt what to you think?
1
1
Gideon Rosenblatt's profile photo
 
I don't know about that, +Steve Wright​. Still having good engagement here, but just been as little busy lately. Still, I am spending a bit more time on FB these days.

Steve Wright (Conches)
moderator

General Discussion  - 
 
This.  This!  This is a really, really good thing. 

"The law, which the city said “strengthens provisions of the City’s Human Right Law,” allows employers to conduct a criminal background check only after they make a conditional job offer to a prospective employee. "

Curious if others agree with me that this is brilliant!
Starting Tuesday, New Yorkers applying for jobs won’t initially need to disclose if they’ve previously been convicted of a crime.
13
Girls Invent - successful entrepreneurs's profile photo
 
Agree it allows a fairer run at getting work provided it doesn't just delay the inevitable where the offer is routinely then withdrawn. I would also advocate the same run being applied to CEOs so they face the same scrutiny?
Add a comment...

Steve Wright (Conches)
moderator

Mission-Driven Business  - 
 
Two articles that make me crazy:

Social enterprises must not prioritise social aims over viability
http://www.theguardian.com/social-enterprise-network/2014/feb/17/social-enterprises-must-prioritise-viability

And

Does Divestment Work
http://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/does-divestment-work

Both of these articles totally miss the boat. Let me begin my argument with a wonderful Peter Drucker quote:

"No financial man will ever understand business because financial people think a company makes money. A company makes shoes, and no financial man understands that. They think money is real. Shoes are real. Money is an end result."

In both of these articles they forget completely about the shoes - which in this case is a world improved in a very specific way. These articles are both condescending and ignorant. Of course profit and return are important.  Yes, profit and return keep-the-lights-on. However, the reason the lights are on is to make a better world so exceptionally talented entrepreneurs and activists manage their impact across a spectrum trade offs. 

Ultimately the real mistake both of these articles make is to take an amoral posture. The value that is created by the work is not in competition with money, no, it defines the purpose of the money. Their is no amoral position and these articles never take in to account the value of the work - of the successful transition of intent to product to outcome. That is just ignorant.
7
1
Sakari Maaranen's profile photoJeff Mowatt's profile photo
2 comments
 
Consider this argument from a social enterprise which was influenced by Peter Drucker's Post Capitalist Society http://www.managementexchange.com/story/re-imagining-capitalism-new-bottom-line
Add a comment...

Steve Wright (Conches)

Shared publicly  - 
 
What exactly does shareholder capitalism expect of the people who run companies and who invest in them? And if it does not expect enough, does that mean we should try something other than shareholder capitalism? These esoteric questions are growing
1

Steve Wright (Conches)
moderator

Ownership & Funding  - 
 
I hope to write a longer piece but, here is my observation about the Social Capital Markets 2015 conference. I have been going to this conference since 2008 and even in those early days the hope was that the movement would grow to attract the institutional capital of mainstream investors. Well, yesterday's plenary session was Brian Trelstadt welcoming Blackrock to impact investing. I have no illusions that Blackrock will apply any intentionality to curing what ails us but I think it is reasonable to think their money aimed somewhat away from odiousness is a non-bad thing.

Alongside that, SOCAP15 has had a thread focused on Neighborhood Economics that is genuinely counter cultural. The idea that economies should be regenerative and serve whole communities flies in the face of the extractive practices of mainstream investing and multinational corporations. And for what it's worth, the quality of the people working on the neighborhood economics problem is much higher than the financial-politicians of the mainstream cabal. :)

8
Jamal Sule's profile photomercy agordetor's profile photo
2 comments
 
Hi i have a better business would you like to know about ?
Add a comment...

Steve Wright (Conches)

Shared publicly  - 
1

Steve Wright (Conches)

Shared publicly  - 
 
 
Quite possibly one of the BEST short Sci-Fi movies you will ever see!
View original post
1

Steve Wright (Conches)
moderator

General Discussion  - 
 
Very good discussion of the impact (good and bad) of the new breed of companies. The term "platform" is used but it seems to mean something totally different than "Salesforce.com is a platform".  In this case it means something more like an "engine".  these are those businesses once inappropriately called the "sharing economy" now occasionally called "the collaborative economy". Issues discussed here are the disruptive nature of these companies to established companies but also the disruption to workers and the potential evolution of "employment security".  A really good read.

"Society is undergoing tremendous change right now — the sharing and collaboration practices of the Internet are extending to transportation (Uber), hotels (Airbnb), financing (Kickstarter, Lending Club) and music services (Spotify). The rise of the collaborative economy, of which the Open Source community is a part, should be a powerful message for the business community. "
12
3
Add a comment...

Steve Wright (Conches)
moderator

Ownership & Funding  - 
 
"Meanwhile investors, particularly the big endowments and large public pension funds that tend to lead opinion in the rest of the fund management industry, are cooling on public markets, and looking instead to private equity"
What exactly does shareholder capitalism expect of the people who run companies and who invest in them? And if it does not expect enough, does that mean we should try something other than shareholder capitalism? These esoteric questions are growing
9
3
Add a comment...

Steve Wright (Conches)
moderator

Un-Good Business  - 
 
+Gideon Rosenblatt​ I would love to get your take on this article given your interest in tech, automation, AI and jobs.

Fro. The article: "we risk becoming the cyber-peasants tending (or loitering on, more likely) the feudal lawn of the machine-owning rich. "
12
3
Gideon Rosenblatt's profile photoRobynne Troskie's profile photoJeff Mowatt's profile photo
6 comments
 
The fate of the working class would be to be discarded we argued in our 2004 business plan, predicting global uprisings. After riots in London, a veteran Marxist seems to have come to the same conclusion, they become redundant as an element of production. http://www.p-ced.com/1/node/30    
Add a comment...
Work
Occupation
Nonprofit leader, network builder, anti-poverty crusader
Employment
  • EARN.org
    CEO, 2015 - 2015
  • grameen foundation
    VP Poverty Tools and Insights, 2012 - 2014
  • Grameen Foundation
    Director, Social Performance Management Center, 2010 - 2013
  • Salesforce.com Foundation
    Director of Technology and Innovation, 2000 - 2010
Places
Map of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has lived
Currently
Oakland, CA
Links
Other profiles
Contributor to
Story
Tagline
Learning to value what happens between the nodes
Education
  • Claremont Graduate University
    Education, 1990 - 1991
    MA Educatiom
  • Pomona College
    English, Creative Writing, 1983 - 1987
  • El camino High School
    1979 - 1983
Basic Information
Gender
Male