So your campaign is about humans not warring?
I think he's saying no one is permitted to fight about anything: no man vs man, woman vs women, no man vs woman. Well at least he's saying the military can withdraw.
Maybe they'll only intervene if women get hurt but if they're only killing male soldiers,hey your outta luck.That sounds like equality in the eyes of some liberal extremists.
Now the policy is not to intervene even with genocidal terrorist armies on the loose - if it is a country the US has messed up. If it is a country the French have messed up they have the foreign legion. If it is a nation the UN has messed up then you have a better chance - unless they send you to one of their refugee camps, since celebrities and maybe Bill and Melinda Gates might visit you or adopt your kids.
As paradigms of sex pivot about a shifting family structure, violent reactionarys will cling to an antiquated ethic. The only solution is to stand entirely opposed to the injustice of gender-based violence.
One can only hope this will succeed. The essential ethic being rejection of a damaged perception of the human condition. A Hobbesian origin is amended only by the assertion of positive rights; these are not granted but natural. A right to life, liberty and, yes, equality ought to be endemic to all society.
Kerry is such a prima donna. Even when you have Angelina Jolie on stage with a photo op he has to be in the foreground, center of attention. I would rather have her as Sec of State and she would no doubt be much better at it.
Add a comment...