Profile

Cover photo
Sridhara Babu
Works at Legal Documentations
Attends Advocate at Independent Practice
Lives in Tumkur - Karnataka - India
296 followers|4,862,060 views
AboutPosts

Stream

Sridhara Babu

Shared publicly  - 
 
HINDU DAUGHTERS RIGHT TO PROPERTY REDIFINED
Daughter Should Be Alive and Her Father Should Also Be Alive on the Date of the Amendment to Confer Equal R...
Daughter Should Be Alive and Her Father Should Also Be Alive on the Date of the Amendment to Confer Equal R...
1
Add a comment...

Sridhara Babu

Shared publicly  - 
 
OMISSION OF A SINGLE MATERIAL FACT LEADS TO AN INCOMPLETE CAUSE OF ACTION 1969 SC
SAMANT N.BALKRISHNA AND ANOTHER V GEORGE FERNANDEZ AND OTHERS 1969 (3) SCC 238 with regard to showing in the election petition the concise statement of material facts with reference to Section 83 of the Act, 1951, wherein it was held thus: “The Section is ...
SAMANT N.BALKRISHNA AND ANOTHER V GEORGE FERNANDEZ AND OTHERS 1969 (3) SCC 238 with regard to showing in the election petition the concise statement of material facts with reference to Section 83 of the Act, 1951, wherein it ...
1
Add a comment...

Sridhara Babu

Shared publicly  - 
 
PROCEDURAL DEFECTS WHICH DO NOT GO TO THE ROOT OF THE MATTER SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO DEFEAT A JUST CAUSE
Supreme Court in United Bank of India v. Naresh Kumar and Others (AIR 1997 SC 3) held that procedural defects which do not go to the root of the matter should not be permitted to defeat a just cause. There is sufficient power in the court under the Code of ...
Supreme Court in United Bank of India v. Naresh Kumar and Others (AIR 1997 SC 3) held that procedural defects which do not go to the root of the matter should not be permitted to defeat a just cause. There is sufficient power...
1
Add a comment...

Sridhara Babu

Shared publicly  - 
 
DOCTRINE OF ESTOPPEL
In Cauvery Coffee Traders, Mangalore v. Hornor Resources (International) Company Limited, (2011) 10 SCC 420, this Court considered a large number of judgments on the issue of estoppels and held as under: “A party cannot be permitted to “blow hot and cold”, ...
In Cauvery Coffee Traders, Mangalore v. Hornor Resources (International) Company Limited, (2011) 10 SCC 420, this Court considered a large number of judgments on the issue of estoppels and held as under: “A party cannot be pe...
1
Add a comment...

Sridhara Babu

Shared publicly  - 
 
NO APPLICATION CAN BE FILED AFTER THE FINAL ARGUMENTS HAVE BEEN HEARD AND THE MATTER IS POSTED FOR JUDGMENT
Rabiya Bi Kassim M. vs The Country Wide Consumer ... on 5 April, 2004 Equivalent citations: ILR 2004 KAR 2215, 2004 (4) KarLJ 189 Author: N Jain Bench: N Jain, V Sabhahit In the facts of the given case, sufficient opportunity was given to the plaintiff to c...
Rabiya Bi Kassim M. vs The Country Wide Consumer ... on 5 April, 2004 Equivalent citations: ILR 2004 KAR 2215, 2004 (4) KarLJ 189 Author: N Jain Bench: N Jain, V Sabhahit In the facts of the given case, sufficient opportunity...
1
Add a comment...

Sridhara Babu

Shared publicly  - 
 
JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS CANNOT BE USED TO PROTECT OR TO PERPETUATE A WRONG
Shiv Kumar Chadha v. MCD (1993 (3) SCC 161) wherein it was observed that injunction is discretionary and that: "Judicial proceedings cannot be used to protect or to perpetuate a wrong committed by a person who approaches the Court". Mahadeo Savlaram Sheike ...
Shiv Kumar Chadha v. MCD (1993 (3) SCC 161) wherein it was observed that injunction is discretionary and that: "Judicial proceedings cannot be used to protect or to perpetuate a wrong committed by a person who approaches the ...
1
Add a comment...
Have him in circles
296 people
Srikantha nelogal Srikantha's profile photo
Rayan John's profile photo
Ramesh Purchase's profile photo
DLF Homes India's profile photo
Dharma Jagruthi's profile photo
Jayakumar Advocate's profile photo
Gurgaon Villa's profile photo
THAKKER. BUILDER . DEVLOPER's profile photo
surya Madakari's profile photo

Sridhara Babu

Shared publicly  - 
 
THE PLEADINGS AND ITS IMPORTANCE IN CIVIL CASES
In Ramrameshwari Devi & Ors. vs. Nirmala Devi & Ors, 2011 (6) SCALE 677 highlighting how frivolous litigations are being instituted and how these frivolous litigations are choking the stream of justice, with reference to importance of pleadings, in sub-par...
In Ramrameshwari Devi & Ors. vs. Nirmala Devi & Ors, 2011 (6) SCALE 677 highlighting how frivolous litigations are being instituted and how these frivolous litigations are choking the stream of justice, with reference to impo...
1
Add a comment...

Sridhara Babu

Shared publicly  - 
 
SECTION 151 OF THE CODE CANNOT BE ROUTINELY INVOKED FOR REOPENING EVIDENCE OR RECALLING WITNESSES - SCOPE OF 151 - SC 2011
K.K. Velusamy vs N. Palaanisamy 2011 (4 ) SCR 31 = 2011 (11 ) SCC 275 We however agree that section 151 of the Code cannot be routinely invoked for reopening evidence or recalling witnesses. The scope of section 151 has been explained by this Court...
K.K. Velusamy vs N. Palaanisamy 2011 (4 ) SCR 31 = 2011 (11 ) SCC 275 We however agree that section 151 of the Code cannot be routinely invoked for reopening evidence or recalling witnesses. The scope of section 151 has been ...
1
Add a comment...

Sridhara Babu

Shared publicly  - 
 
COURTS INHERENT POWER INCLUDES POWER TO RECTIFY ITS MISTAKES
Jagannatha Shetty, J. in State of Karnataka v. Balekal Krishna Bhat ((1975) 2 Kant LJ 489) in which he affirmed an order made by the trial Court exercising the inherent Powers in setting aside the order of dismissal of a reference made under Section 18 of t...
Jagannatha Shetty, J. in State of Karnataka v. Balekal Krishna Bhat ((1975) 2 Kant LJ 489) in which he affirmed an order made by the trial Court exercising the inherent Powers in setting aside the order of dismissal of a refe...
1
Add a comment...

Sridhara Babu

Shared publicly  - 
 
CLEAN HANDS OF LITIGANT
Whenever a person approaches a Court of Equity, in the exercise of its extraordinary jurisdiction, it is expected that he will approach the said court not only with clean hands but also with a clean mind, a clean heart and clean objectives. Thus, he who see...
Whenever a person approaches a Court of Equity, in the exercise of its extraordinary jurisdiction, it is expected that he will approach the said court not only with clean hands but also with a clean mind, a clean heart and cl...
1
Add a comment...

Sridhara Babu

Shared publicly  - 
 
WHAT IS MATERIAL FACTS IN A PLEADING
Sopan Sukhdeo Sable & ors vs. Assistant Charity Commissioner - (2004) 3 SCC 137 There is distinction between 'material facts' and 'particulars'. The words 'material facts' show that the facts necessary to formulate a complete cause of action must be stated....
Sopan Sukhdeo Sable & ors vs. Assistant Charity Commissioner - (2004) 3 SCC 137 There is distinction between 'material facts' and 'particulars'. The words 'material facts' show that the facts necessary to formulate a complete...
1
Add a comment...

Sridhara Babu

Shared publicly  - 
 
JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS CANNOT BE USED TO PROTECT OR TO PERPETUATE A WRONG
Shiv Kumar Chadha v. MCD (1993 (3) SCC 161) wherein it was observed that injunction is discretionary and that: "Judicial proceedings cannot be used to protect or to perpetuate a wrong committed by a person who approaches the Court". Mahadeo Savlaram Sheike ...
Shiv Kumar Chadha v. MCD (1993 (3) SCC 161) wherein it was observed that injunction is discretionary and that: "Judicial proceedings cannot be used to protect or to perpetuate a wrong committed by a person who approaches the ...
1
Add a comment...
People
Have him in circles
296 people
Srikantha nelogal Srikantha's profile photo
Rayan John's profile photo
Ramesh Purchase's profile photo
DLF Homes India's profile photo
Dharma Jagruthi's profile photo
Jayakumar Advocate's profile photo
Gurgaon Villa's profile photo
THAKKER. BUILDER . DEVLOPER's profile photo
surya Madakari's profile photo
Work
Occupation
Advocate
Employment
  • Legal Documentations
    Advocate, 2000 - present
Places
Map of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has lived
Currently
Tumkur - Karnataka - India
Previously
india - k r extension - g k road - tumkur - karnataka
Contact Information
Home
Mobile
9880339764
Email
Address
#602, SRI RAJARAJESHWARINILAYA, TUDA LAYOUT, SIRAGATE, TUMKUR, KARNATAKA, INDIA, PIN:572106
Work
Email
Address
LEGAL DOCUMENTATIONS G.K.ROAD, K.R.EXTENSION, TUMKUR, KARNATAKA, INDIA, PIN:572101
Story
Tagline
Born at Tumkur/ Karnataka/ India on 21-04-1966, to a small time goldsmith Sri H.R. Nagarajachar and Smt Late Gowramma...Studied BA LLB from Bangalore University...Enrolled as Advocate on 08-09-2000 at KSBC... Initially guided by Senior Advocate Mr S.M.Somashekarappa, Now Practicing as Advocate from 15+ Years in Tumkur District... ..AREA OF PRACTICE : Litigation and Non-Litigation Law Practice...Message:- Today legal literacy is in cross roads leading to literate ignorance on many subjects, to overcome little shortcomings, I made small efforts to help new comers to our profession and needy literates. If you have been helped by my blogs, try to help and spread legal awareness to your nearby illiterates.
Introduction
Born in Tumkur on 21-04-1966, to a small time goldsmith Sri H.R. Nagarajachar and Smt Gowramma.

Studied BA LLB from Bangalore University.

Enrolled as Advocate on 08-09-2000 at KSBC.

Practicing as Advocate from 15+ Years in Tumkur District.

 

PLACE OF PRACTICE TUMKUR (KARNATAKA)
AREA OF PRACTICE :- Both litigation and non litigation legal service. 
Education
  • Advocate at Independent Practice
    Tumkur - Karnataka, 2000 - present
  • Sheshadripuram Law College Bangalore
    Law, 1989 - 1992
Basic Information
Gender
Male
Relationship
Married
Other names
Advocate Babu