Yes, Android was in development years before iOS, yet changed from a Blackberry clone to an iPhone clone just after the iPhone's release. There is NOTHING obvious about the layout or interaction used on iOS until AFTER somebody has done it that way. When the interaction is done the same way, down to the visualisations for interaction (such as the little grey dots to denote multiple "pages" of the desktop) then it's safe to say that the developers are not being fueled by inspiration...at least not their own. Same goes for Apple's copying of the drop down notification system (which they implemented badly. Copying tends to end in bad and clunky implementations, no matter who does the copying).
Think Different.... yeah, about inspiration for creation, because so many content creators use products from Apple. Which is why this reference becomes a little self-defeating.
Don't get me wrong, I actually like Android. I just don't like the silly people who think that it is Android vs Apple and make stupid logos that really just show how far up their behinds their heads are. It is Android FOR Android. Not against anything or anyone. Android doesn't gain anything by Android fans using anti-someoneelse propaganda, that only suggests that Android fans are the same sort of fanatics that Apple users have been accused of being. Is that REALLY the image you want to project?.
Try to make logos and visualisations that show the strengths of Android...
(and for the record I also think that Apple's ads against MS were childish and may have been self-defeating, as were MS stupid attempts at a rebuttal. This kind of crap doesn't help the brand, the system, or the ecosystem, labels users of the system as fanatics, and only preaches to the choir)