Shared publicly  - 
 
Is Science Consistent with Evolution?
Alvin Plantinga (1932), professor emeritus of philosophy at the University of Notre Dame, is a leading theistic philosopher and opponent of evolution.

The argument runs as follows: The naturalist can be reasonably sure that the neurophysiology underlying belief formation is adaptive, but nothing follows about the truth of the beliefs depending on that neurophysiology. In fact, he’d have to hold that it is unlikely, given unguided evolution, that our cognitive faculties are reliable. It’s as likely, given unguided evolution, that we live in a sort of dream world as that we actually know something about ourselves and our world (original emphasis). In other words, if people in fact evolved, they could not trust their cognitive faculties to give them the truth and hence, do science. He goes on to argue that it is only possible to trust our cognitive faculties if people are created in God’s image.

Source: http://ompp.wordpress.com/2012/05/05/the-live-blog-everyones-been-waiting-for/
Courtesy: +Sean Carroll
Hot Topics. cosmic_ray. A Real Beauty: CMS Spots New Composite Particle. The CMS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider has observed a new beauty baryon, a composite particle made up of three quarks....
1
Add a comment...