Indeed it would. Science is about examining the way the physical world works, psychology and sociology study how humans behave in it. Maybe, one day, the two will not be mutually exclusive, but I don't see how you could ever use science to make a moral choice. Morality is a concept, not a measurable physical reality. Encouraging people to think in a rational, critical way from an early age - not just teaching them to memorise facts - would probably be a Bloody Good Idea, but it will only get you so far in deciding what's right and wrong, just or unjust.

Though if I hear scientists described as "elite" one more time I think I'm going to scream. Why are we "elite" whereas the "ordinary" people who spend just as much time and dedication in their jobs are described as "hard working" ? Cue angry blog post in 3, 2, 1....
Neil deGrasse Tyson imagines a country called Rationalia, a society where policy is based on the weight of evidence. That's a bad idea, says Jeffrey Guhin.
Shared publiclyView activity