Technically no, Gish, for whom that term was coined, was allowed as a speaker a larger time frame than his opponent in that debate.
Here on the internet, we are not held to fucking time limits? Are we? No.
Just because he is overwhelmed by various small arguments, doesn't mean that they aren't valid. Nor does it make it a Gish Gallop.
Obviously, anyone that has actually lost any debate ever, has been flooded with a torrent of arguments for which they have no (or a poorly constructed) response.
What your doing, is called "Thought Terminating Cliche'".
And technically, that is exactly what you both attempted to do. And failed.slow clap
Now show me some evidence which actually shows a single one of these murders was committed in the name of right wing politics? No Ok. Than you concede to my point.
Show me proof that the origin of religion is symmetrical to the origin of the right wing? No. Ok. Well than you concede that point too.
Show me proof that the origin of racism was cohesively linked with right wing beliefs at the birth of either? No. Ok. Than you concede my point.
Fact of the matter is, your both saying very little about the points being made. And jabbering on like poorly educated fools, which is exactly what I expect you both are.