How can the Herald take itself seriously when it allows it editorial to be decided by Sutton Harbour Holdings?
A newpaper is only as good as it's journalistic integrety. Why does it keep deleting balanced user comments on a story about a light aircraft which had to make a precautionary landing at Plymouth Airport? Could it be that Sutton Harbour Holdings are a significant advertiser at the paper, and don't want the story to say anymore than their press release?
A paper that pays no heed to editorial independence and demonstrates this by suppressing comment on the misdeeds of one of their advertisers (Sutton Harbour Holdings plc) in detaining unlawfully an aircraft that landed on the disused Plymouth Airport for safety reasons. A disgrace to journalism. #FreeTheJodel
interesting editorial approach
happy to accept comments
as long as you don't mention the dastardly deeds of Sutton Harbour Holdings who have impounded an aircraft that lawfully made a precautionary landing at Plymouth airfield
they refuse to allow it to fly out and refuse to allow it access to one of the many empty hangars to protect it from deteriorating weather