Anomaly, how strange, that anomalies are strange, after all, science is not normative, so there should be no such thing as anomalies, why, and why, to see anomalies you need to know some theory, eg physical, that is look at the world from the perspective of theory science, on the other hand, describes this world from the perspective of observation and experiment, and if it observes it takes the impression as it is and on the basis of these impressions confirmed experimentally describes it. As long as science is normative and excludes the existence of certain phenomena, it can not be considered as science, but rather as ideology. However, when theoretical explanation of sensory, emotional, emotional and rational sensations, striving for a coherent description of the world, I would call it science, but then there is no place for anomalies, because the impressions of some are revised by the impressions of others. I am allowing only a certain skepticism that unless you have something experimental confirmed you can not claim to be called intersubjectivity, but there are times when two people are looking at this sunset saying "I feel the same". The scientist is not the creator of the world, he does not normalize him as a politician normalizes citizens by passing laws, the scientist is not even creative, because he is observing nature and on the basis of this observation puts hypotheses, which later is verified experimentally by recreating the observation conditions in the lab space.