Cover photo
Peter Suber
Works at Harvard Office for Scholarly Communication
4,169 followers|963,133 views


Peter Suber

Shared publicly  - 
Google+ to Twitter.

I use <> to publish my +Google+ posts in an RSS feed, and I use <> to send that RSS feed to +Twitter. When it works, it works well, and my new G+ posts make it to Twitter in just a few minutes. But this mashup is getting flaky. Like an old TV, it stops working at random and only works again when I whack it on the side with my fist.

As far as I can tell, the problem lies with <>. Sometimes it takes many hours to notice that I've written a new G+ post, and sometimes it never seems to notice. Moreover, it has no ping button letting me force it to notice. The fist-whack that sometimes works is for me to tweak my Feedburner settings in some arbitrary way, save them, and then restore the settings I originally had. This seems to propagate a signal back to Gplusrss, which wakes it up. But even this odd whack only works intermittently. Sometimes I have to try the tweak/save/restore/save cycle half a dozen times before the posts start flowing again.

Can anyone see a solution here? Does anyone know a better G+ to RSS service than <>?

Before someone suggests that +HootSuite could solve this problem by letting me post simultaneously to G+ and Twitter, I've already thought of that. HootSuite can to this for G+ "page" accounts (because Google has given them an API), but it can't yet do it for G+ personal accounts (because Google has not yet given them an API).

#google+  #twitter   #rss #mashups
Mike Jenkinson's profile photoAnne Hole's profile photoSocial Solutions's profile photoPeter Suber's profile photo
+ManageFlitter also provides this functionality.
Add a comment...
Rejecting demands for openness used for harassment and intimidation.

From the +Chronicle of Higher Education:  "The Virginia Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a conservative group’s attempt to obtain the records of [+Michael Mann,] a climate scientist and former professor at the University of Virginia...The case focused on whether the state’s open-records law exempted a range of documents deemed by the university to be proprietary....Justice Donald W. Lemons wrote that...'[the law protects universities from] harm to university-wide research efforts, damage to faculty recruitment and retention, undermining of faculty expectations of privacy and confidentiality, and impairment of free thought and expression.'..."

I applaud this decision. It may look like a defeat for openness, but it's merely a defeat for harassment and intimidation. It's entirely compatible with politically neutral calls for open access to research. For more, see my 2010 article on politically selective calls for open access, which discussed the first stirrings of this case.

#oa #openaccess #climate
Scott Ullman's profile photoNick Breeze's profile photo
A bit of a ridiculous case. Wasting time dealing with #climate  change deniers and vested interests. Michael Mann couldn't have more integrity! 
Envisionation: Interview With Dr James Hansen & Michael Mann
Add a comment...

Peter Suber

Shared publicly  - 
And thank you readers and downloaders of Harvard authors!

#oa #openaccess 
The OSC celebrates the milestone of having surpassed 3 million downloads from DASH! 
Sridhar Gutam's profile photoGideon Burton's profile photo
Add a comment...

Peter Suber

Shared publicly  - 
Two milestones for the Open Access Tracking Project.

Over the weekend, the Open Access Tracking Project (+OATP) passed the milestones of 30,000 tagged resources in the project database and 20,000 tagged resources in the primary project feed.

The difference between the two is that the primary project feed is limited to items that were new at the time they were tagged, as part of the OATP alert service for those following the progress of OA. The project database overall includes OA-related resources tagged retroactively, as part of the OATP effort to classify OA developments with OATP tags and make them available through the OATP search engine.

If you're reading this in Google+, then circle +OATP to follow an abridged version of the OATP primary feed right here in G+.

For the reasons why the G+ version is abridged, and five ways to follow an unabridged version (RSS, Atom, JSON, Email, and HTML), see our post <> from February 2014.

#oa #openaccess #oatp #tagteam
1's profile photo
Add a comment...

Peter Suber

Shared publicly  - 
"Higher priced titles do have higher Impact Factors and Eigenfactors, but the increase in the metrics is small when compared to the increase in costs, since the average price ($5,188) for the most expensive journals was 30 times higher than the average price ($158) for the least expensive journals. The increase in prices for the lower cost titles was lower than for the more expensive titles. Article Influence Score did not show a strong correlation between higher scores and prices...."
Sridhar Gutam's profile photoMarcus Hanwell's profile photoSylvia Kuenne's profile photoRichard Poynder's profile photo
Wow, thanks Peter.
Add a comment...
Have him in circles
4,169 people
References should connect readers to full texts, and therefore favor OA editions.

A nice argument from Patrick Dunleavy: "What is the essential purpose of academic referencing? ...A completely out of date answer dominates current practice  — namely...[directing readers] to the same precise sources and pages that you yourself used in constructing an argument or a case....Referencing should instead be about directly connecting readers to the full text of your sources, ideally in a one-stop way....In other words, modern referencing is not about pointing to some source details for books that cost a small fortune and are buried away in some library where the reader is not present; still less about pointing to source details for an article in a pay-wall journal to which readers do not have access....With open access spreading now we can all do better, far better, if we follow one dominant principle. Referencing should connect readers as far as possible to open access sources, and scholars should in all cases and in every possible way treat the open access versions of texts as the primary source...."

#oa #openaccess #references   #citations  
C. Sean Burns's profile photoMarius Buliga's profile photoJoerg Fliege's profile photoRaymond Johnson's profile photo
Aside from that person's argument about overhauling the reference systems that we use (surely necessary), that "one-click" priority preference is somewhat problematic. It assumes that all information is equal. It does not take into consideration (or dismisses the notion) that information that has not been digitized or that is behind a pay wall may be better or as important information.

Although the argument makes a claim about 'replicability,' what it really seems to be speaking to is the growing expectation of immediacy --- that is, the apparent moral praiseworthiness we can credit authors or publishers who make it possible to click a link to retrieve a full text document versus the apparent moral blameworthiness of not being able to do so (and instead, e.g., having to find information that is "buried in some library").

Personally, I do look forward to the day when most if not all scientific or scholarly material is freely available as open access, but until that time comes, it seems to me that there would be some serious [moral and practical] implications if researchers intentionally only read and cited literature that is available with a single click of a button and ignored all the rest (as if the tendency to favor reporting positive findings is the only kind of bias that can exist).

Rather, the search and retrieval of good information might best be served by the same kind of activity that P. W. Bridgman described in 1955, that Gerald Holton picked up on in 1994, and that Susan Haack continued in 2003/07 about the scientific method --- that "it is nothing more than doing one's damnedest [...], no holds barred" (Bridgman, p. 534; Holton, p. 78; Haack, p. 24).

Add a comment...

Peter Suber

Shared publicly  - 
Thank you Matilda Amissah-Arthur.

The Second Lady of Nigeria, Matilda Amissah-Arthur, highlighted #OA yesterday at an international workshop for librarians. "Mrs Amissah-Arthur said...the services [of a library] had evolved from the days of closed stacks, through shelf browsing, card catalogues and OPACs to open access and institutional repositories...."

#oa #openaccess 
Second Lady Mrs Matilda Amissah-Arthur yesterday opened a three-day international workshop for librarians, with a call on the participants to sharpen their skil...
Add a comment...
You know that open data has made it into the pantheon of obviously good things when people fight over who deserves credit for it.

#oa #openaccess #opendata
Markus Trapp's profile photo
Add a comment...

Peter Suber

Shared publicly  - 
Kudos to the Human Frontier Science Program.

"The Human Frontier Science Program (HFSP)...expects that...publications arising from HFSP funded projects are made freely available as soon as possible after publication and licensed in ways which allow others to build upon and re-use this content. Therefore HFSP funded scientists are encouraged to maximize the dissemination of their research output by opting to publish their research articles using the Creative Commons Attribution license CC-BY to guarantee unrestricted open access as early as possible after acceptance of a manuscript. Awardees are free to choose to make the article open-access by 1) publishing in an open-access journal, 2) posting to an online repository, or 3) paying an open access fee to a hybrid journal. In order to meet the above criteria, HFSP awardees...may pay these charges from the research portion of their HFSP funds...."

#oa #openaccess 
Anastasia Christakou's profile photoMatthew Todd's profile photo
Add a comment...
This isn't the whole of post-publication peer review, but it's a piece. At the same time, it's a piece of evidence that the basic idea works:

Online exposure ‘leads to higher research paper correction rate’

If you call it the sunlight principle, or the eyeballs principle, then it doesn't sound new or trendy. But that's good. Exposing work to criticism is not new or trendy. It lies at the heart of what we mean by science, at the heart of what we mean by the self-correction of science, and at the heart of the epistemological argument for open access (as opposed to the moral, pragmatic, and economic arguments). I say more in this 2008 article.

#oa #openaccess #peer_review
David Solomon's profile photoGuy Bilodeau's profile photoJoerg Fliege's profile photoOpen Science's profile photo
This is another summary, I think a little better job.

Or better yet read the original in PeerJ

Add a comment...
I work for the free circulation of science and scholarship in every field and language. In practice that means research, writing, organizing, and pro bono consulting for open access to research. I wear several hats:
I'm the founder of the Open Access Tracking Project, co-founder of the Open Access Directory, and co-developer of TagTeam.

My latest book is Open Access (MIT Press, 2012). The book itself is OA, and I've created a book home page for linking to OA editions, reviews, and translations, and for posting updates and supplements. Also see my other writings on open access, my writings on topics other than open access, and my section the Harvard institutional repository.

For more detail, see my home page.

My G+ posts are automatically reposted to my Twitter account. I seldom post to Twitter manually. I don't use FB or LinkedIn at all. For now, I'm on what Mike Elgan calls a Google+ diet

Most of my G+ posts are about open access (OA), but most of what I want to share about OA doesn't yet make it to G+. I tag new OA developments for the Open Access Tracking Project (OATP). You can follow complete versions of the OATP feed on the web or by RSS, Atom, JSONP, or email. There are also Twitter and G+ versions of the feed, but unfortunately they are both abridged (details here and here respectively). 
Basic Information
Peter Suber's +1's are the things they like, agree with, or want to recommend.
Contacting Congress Just Got Easier - InformationWeek

Electronic Frontier Foundation and more than 100 volunteer developers are working on a tool that pairs public domain data with free software

The Open Access Button to crowdfund Button 2.0

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 22 2014 Contact: LONDON, UK – The Open Access Button is launching a crowdfunding cam

Virginia Supreme Court Rules for UVa and Climate Scientist in Records Su...

Facts &amp; Figures · Almanac of Higher Education 2013 · Foundation Support for Higher Education Shares Goals, Recipients · Executive Compensati

U.S. court: Companies can't litigate secretly to protect image

(Reuters) - In a victory for consumers, a federal appeals court on Wednesday directed that litigation about a product linked to the death of

Welcome - The Takedown Project

The Takedown Project is a collaborative effort housed at UC-Berkeley School of Law and the American Assembly to study notice and takedown pr

CLIR Appoints John Unsworth Distinguished Presidential Fellow

Washington, DC (PRWEB) April 09, 2014 -- Brandeis University provost, librarian, and CIO will serve as mentor to CLIR Postdoctoral Fellows.

India suffers doubly due to lack of open access - University World News

Developing nations, especially India, increasingly face a challenge in prioritising their goals. One that has become increasingly relevant i

First Milestone Is Claimed on Long Road to Tracking Science’s Economic V...

In a report published on Thursday, researchers described progress in efforts to use rigorous science to gauge the effect of federal spending

ACSGate: Pandora opens the American Chemical Society’s box and her Unive...

Pandora is a researcher (won't say where, won't say when). I don't know her field – she may be a scientist or a librarian. She has been scan

ACSGate: Pandora opens the American Chemical Society’s box and her Unive...

Pandora is a researcher (won’t say where, won’t say when). I don’t know her field – she may be a scientist or a librarian. She has been scan

CD and DVD copying to be made legal from June 1st in the UK

Copying of CDs, DVDs and Blu-rays for personal use will become legal in the UK from June 1st. The UK Government has issued a guide to the ch

2014/07 : HEFCE

Executive summary. Purpose. 1. This document sets out the details of a requirement that certain research outputs should be made open-access

IMLS, Sloan Foundation Jointly Award SHARE $1 Million to Develop Notific...

The Association of Research Libraries (ARL) has been awarded a joint $1 million grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IML

A night of winners!

Last night marked the Access to Understanding 2014 science-writing competition award ceremony. At its heart, the competition is a celebratio

Gov't data should be free: Turnbull

New chapter begins for women in PS. news1. Australia joins global leadership program. An Australian Chapter of the Women in Public Service P

Attacking academic values | Scholarly Communications @ Duke

A new thing started happening here at Duke this week; we began getting inquiries from some faculty authors about how to obtain a formal waiv

Benefits of Open Access « SPARC Europe

Researchers as authors: immediate visibility for research output and thus increased visibility and usage of their results. Open Access may e

Arab strategy on research collaboration endorsed - SciDev.Net

Ministers back plan to turn more research into practical schemes that can boost the region’s development.