Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Peter Boothe
370 followers -
It's me!
It's me!

370 followers
About
Posts

Post has attachment
Competence at computers is incredibly important and incredibly rare.

Hackers just got a copy of every single federal employee's data. They may have gotten copies of every single security clearance application. This is very very bad.
Add a comment...

Post has shared content
This Chrome extension makes my life a little better every day.
Cool Chrome extension that shows you a new piece of art every time you open a new tab.
Google Art Project
Google Art Project
chrome.google.com
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Tracy blogs the World Cup? Yes!
Tracy Blogs the World Cup
Tracy Blogs the World Cup
tracyblogstheworldcup.tumblr.com
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Interview advice. Enough people have asked me for it that I figured I should write it down.
Add a comment...

Post has shared content
Hey, look!  It's a family photo!
#Mars #SpaceImages #Photography

Look Back in Wonder: +NASA's Curiosity rover's first picture of Earth from the surface of Mars. Info: http://go.nasa.gov/1bz4mVn
Photo
Add a comment...

Random math thought:

Can a bayesian reasoner have an opinion about a theory, or only about an individual fact?  Theories are elements from the power set of facts (which is itself a countably infinite set), and so there are more theories (at least |R| many) than there are descriptions of theories (of which there are only |Z|).

I'm okay (kinda) with a bayeseian reasoner updating itself about whether X is true when it encounters a new fact about X, but how could it ever, even (ahem) in theory, update it's belief about every possible theory when it encounters a new fact?
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Bridges of NYC: solvable, as long as you are willing to forgo visiting the singly connected islands of Staten, City, Rikers, and Roosevelt.  Also, you will need to be multi-modal as some of the bridges considered are pedestrian-only, and others are car-only.
Add a comment...

Post has attachment

I'd like to explain why John Boehner has led the charge to shut down the government thanks to some combination of innumeracy and his lack of knowledge of game theory.

Some numbers to start us off:

  The house has 433 congressional representatives in it.

    193 are Democratic

    240 are Republican

    of the Republicans,
      66 belong to the Tea Party Caucus.
    By the magic of subtraction, we can see that
      240 - 66 = 174 Republicans are NOT member of the Tea Party Caucus.

John Boehner, due to innumeracy or just plain not giving a damn-ness, has said that he won't bring to a vote any budget that won't get enough votes to pass the house solely with Republican support.  For a bill to pass the house, it needs ceiling(433/2)=217 votes.  This means that he won't bring a budget to the floor unless it can garner 217 Republican votes, rather than 217 votes total.

To get that many Republican votes, if we assume that all non-Tea-Party members of the Republican party care even slightly more about the continued operation of the US government than they do about Obamacare and governments invading ladyparts, he has to convince 217 - 174 = 43 members of the Tea Party Caucus to do something other than shut down the government.  However, the Tea Party Caucus has, as its main planks, "No Obamacare", "Government Bad", and "Government Must Forcibly Interfere With A Lady's Medical Choices".  Three things that Obama will simply not sign into law.

Because Boehner refuses to consider Democratic votes as "votes" that could be used to pass a budget, the Tea Party controls congress.  As long as the Tea Party controls congress, nothing is going to get fixed, because the Tea Party's official position on compromise (inasmuch as there is such a thing as the official position of the Tea Party besides "the future is bad and scary") is that compromise is the same as losing.

The government is going to stay shut down.  We're going to hit the debt ceiling and the full faith and credit of the United States will be called into question.  This will happen because John Boehner has publicly promised that, in the house, only Republican votes count.

John Boehner is a terrible human being who is bad at his job and can't add, and his terribleness is going to bring us all down.
Add a comment...

I am an irrational monkey with limited computational power, bizarrely discontinuous supply and demand curves, dependent on those around me to survive whilst simultaneously caring about their status, and I have very little insight into what I actually want.  I suspect I am not alone in this, although I also suspect most of my fellow monkeys would (irrationally :) ) not describe themselves in this manner.  Where is the economics applicable to computationally limited, irrational, social, ignorant ape hordes?
Add a comment...
Wait while more posts are being loaded