Obama on Prism, Phone Spying Controversy: "No One Is Listening To Your Phone Calls"
I am a New Yorker, a law student, a quadriplegic. #ifihadglass I could finally capture my life on my own. I would show the world how to thrive with physical limitations in the most interesting city on the planet. With Glass, paralysis doesn't have to be paralyzing.
Join her on a camping trip as she tells her story #throughglass. To learn more about Alex and her adventures with Glass, visit: alexbtrust.org.
This entire film was shot through Glass.
The largest German mail providers launched a program to send all emails SSL encrypted AND make sure they would stay within Germany and on German servers. Making sure that that the fierce Germany privacy would govern them.
Commercially smart and they intent to go even further by showing you some sort of warning if you sent email to a 'Not Made In Germany' recipient. It will no doubt stimulate people to use GMX.DE, T-Online or WEB.DE and the future partners who already have 65% of the national market.
The fallout is also clear: everything outside of Germany is mistrusted and having warnings popup when you communicate with f.i. Google will severely hurt other providers.
Google was one of the first to offer SSL protected transport of email, but as their server is US jurisdiction they will have to hand over your unencrypted email to the NSA. Google could counter this by offering real end-end encryption, meaning that they never store it in plain text, but they are unwilling to do so as the money is in targeted ads so they have to scan them. They defend their position by claiming they can't protect you from spam if they would allow full encryption.
Anyway, this German program does exactly the same as Google, but the key difference is that the servers from the three partners are on German soil and fall under German jurisdiction.
It's good marketing, but this reversal to a sort of national email network is hampering international contacts, just like the US rules that all communication with foreigners can be legally intercepted.
Back to national borders for trusted emails: good or saddening
More info on http://www.telekom.com/media/company/192834 and https://www.e-mail-made-in-germany.de/Verschluesselung.html
"direct relationships" mediated through ... Google
Update: "Because of this setup, Chandra says that Google is not tracking which videos you're watching, despite the fact that much of the Google Cast operation happens on Google's own servers. "All we will know is that we received something to send to somebody else. We have no information about the actual message itself." While you can choose to opt into anonymous, aggregated user tracking, Chandra tells us that Google has no intention of turning Google Cast into an ad platform."
Unlike Apple TV and Airplay, this does not stream from your laptop to the TV; this streams directly to your TV — it’s plugged into an HDMI port — over wi-fi via the cloud … er, via Google, that is. Oh, and it works with Apple iOS devices, too.
I’m just beginning to get a grasp on all the implications. Here are some I see.
* Simply put, I’ll end up watching more internet content because it’s so easy now. According to today’s demonstration, as soon as I tell Chrome to move something to my TV, the Chromecast device will sense the command and take over the TV. Nevermind smart TVs and cable boxes; the net is now in charge. There’s no more awkward searching using the world’s slowest typing via my cable box or a web-connected TV. There’s no more switching manually from one box to another. If it’s as advertised, I’ll just click on my browser and up it comes on my TV. Voila.
* Because Google issued an API, every company with web video — my beloved TWiT, for example — is motivated to add a Chromecast button to its content.
* Thus Google knows more about what you’re watching, which will allow it to make recommendations to you. Google becomes a more effective search engine for entertainment: TV Guide reborn at last.
* Google gets more opportunities to sell higher-priced video advertising on its content, which is will surely promote.
* Google gets more opportunities to sell you shows and movies from its Play Store, competing with both Apple and Amazon.
* YouTube gets a big boost in creating channels and building a new revenue stream: subscriptions. This is a paywall that will work simply because entertainment is a unique product, unlike news, which is — sorry to break the news to you — a commodity. I also wonder whether Google is getting a reward for all the Netflix subscriptions it will sell.
* TV is no longer device-dependant but viewer-dependant. I can start watching a show in one room then watch it another and then take it with me and watch on my tablet from where I left off.
* I can throw out the device with the worst user interface on earth: the cable remote. Now I can control video via my phone and probably do much more with it (again, I’m imagining new game interfaces).
* I can take a Chromecast with me on the road and use it in hotel rooms or in conference rooms to give presentations.
Those are implications for me as a user or viewer or whatever the hell I am now. That’s why I quickly bought three Chromecasts: one for the family room, one for my office, one for the briefcase and the road. What the hell, they’re cheap.
Harder to fully catalog are the implications for the industry — make that industries — affected. Too often, TV and the oligopolies that control it have been declared dead yet they keep going. One of these days, one of the bullets shot at them will hit the heart. Is this it?
* Cable is hearing a loud, growing snipping sound on the horizon. This makes it yet easier for us all to cut the cord. This unravels their bundling of channels. I’ll never count these sharks out. But it looks like it could be Sharknado for them. I also anticipate them trying to screw up our internet bandwidth every way they can: limiting speeds and downloading or charging us through the nose for decent service if we use Chromecast — from their greedy perspective — “too much.”
* Networks should also start feeling sweaty, for there is even less need for their bundling when we can find the shows and stars we want without them. The broadcast networks will descend even deeper into the slough of crappy reality TV. Cable networks will find their subsidies via cable operators’ bundles threatened. TV — like music and news — may finally come unbundled. But then again, TV networks are the first to run for the lifeboats and steal the oars. I remember well the day when ABC decided to stream Desperate Housewives on the net the morning after it aired on broadcast, screwing its broadcast affiliates. They’d love to do the same to cable MSOs. Will this give them their excuse?
* Content creators have yet another huge opportunity to cut out two layers of middlemen and have direct relationships with fans, selling them their content or serving them more targeted and valuable ads. Creators can be discovered directly. But we know how difficult it is to be discovered. Who can help? Oh, yeah, Google.
* Apple? As someone said on Twitter: Apple should have made this.
Yes, Apple could throw out its Apple TV and shift to this model. But it’s disadvantaged against Google because it doesn’t offer the same gateway to the entire wonderful world of web video; it offers things it makes deals for, things it wants to sell us.
* Amazon? Hmmm. On the one hand, if I can more easily shift things I buy at Amazon onto my TV screen — just as I read Kindle books on my Google Nexus 7 table, not on an Amazon Kindle. But Amazon is as much a control freak as Apple and I can’t imagine Jeff Bezos is laughing that laugh of his right now.
* Advertisers will see the opportunity to directly subsidize content and learn more about consumers through direct relationships, no longer mediated by both channels and cable companies. (That presumes that advertisers and their agencies are smart enough to build audiences rather than just buying mass; so far, too many of them haven’t been.) Though there will be more entertainment behind pay walls, I think, there’ll still be plenty of free entertainment to piggyback on.
* Kids in garages with cameras will find path to the big screen is now direct if anybody wants to watch their stuff.
What other implications do you see?
…exactly the thing that cable news owners strenuously avoid, by preventing their captive "dittohead" audiences from hearing or seeing dissenting opinions. Especially not refutations of all-out lies!
Alas that forecasts in science fiction novels get little credit. Today, this "newly discovered" phenomenon is called "the filter bubble—being surrounded only by people you like and content that you agree with." Still, have a look at this clever suggested partial solution.
"They also say that challenging people with new ideas makes them generally more receptive to change. That has important implications for social media sites. There is good evidence that users can sometimes become so resistant to change than any form of redesign dramatically reduces the popularity of the service. Giving them a greater range of content could change that."
- Oberlin College
- University of California, Hastings College of the Law
Journalists Need To Start Asking About Storage, Not Access
It's becoming pretty clear, particularly from today's Snowden Q&A and the partial transcript from President Obama's Charlie Rose interview,
What Would Steve Do? 10 Lessons from the World's Most Captivating P...
Get more tips from the world's best presenters: http://bit.ly/Z8Spem
Why Facebook and Google's Concept of "Real Names" Is Revolutionary
The online kingpins version of identity online is a radical departure from what we expect in real life
A Wonderfully Simple Explanation of Oil Price and the Economy
The price of gas seems to keep changing, but the truth is that the problem isn't just to do with decreasing oil resources. In fact, the pric
Google announces Dart programming language | ExtremeTech
A few days after Google was caught registering a bunch of Dart-related domain names, and the consequent storm of speculation, it has now eme
CISPA Not the Right Way to Achieve Cybersecurity | Debate Club | US News...
Should the Congress Pass CISPA? > CISPA Not the Right Way to Achieve Cybersecurity. CISPA presents a false choice between network securit
PeopleBrowsr Presents The Future of News - An Orwellian Inversion
A presentation at News Foo Phoenix Ignite by Jodee Rich CEO PeopleBrowsr. The Social Media Revolution is an inverted Orwellian Revolution -
The Internet Will Get a Peer Review Layer Next Year
A project lead by some of the most-respected leaders of the Internet has secured $240,000 in funding to build a prototype system for both ex
Facebook Investor Roger McNamee Explains Why Social Is Over
Also, Microsoft is toast and HTML5 is the future.
Think App.net is just a Twitter clone? Then you're missing the point
Most critics of Dalton Caldwell's App.net project seem to see it as a replacement for Twitter, only with users paying for the service rather
Building the search engine of the future, one baby step at a time
Larry Page once described the perfect search engine as understanding exactly what you mean and giving you back exactly what you want. It's v
Wonderful World Of Drones with Christopher McDonald
Christopher McDonald shows you there's nothing to fear from unmanned drones. Unless they're blowing you up.