The Perils of Writing in Social
aka AUTHENTIC ME: The Prequel
Follow up to 'The Dark Side of Social Media?' by +Iblis Bane 

Before the blank page, come the two words. 'Am I?'

Close Friend: You should continue to write. I am sure you have plenty of interesting stories left to tell, and it allows you to be not so nice or polite. You are a different person  when you write.
Me: Am I?
Close Friend: I should hope so! 

Anyone who chooses to write, to share thoughts within any type of social arena knows that you must choose a language to share your thoughts. I choose the LANGUAGE of HUMANITY as it provides a mask to Authenticity. The presence of this mask provides a capacity; no - a distillery to deal with the challenges and accompanying frustrations of writing. I need this - as that same frustration is my daily companion, word by word, sentence by sentence.

How is this choice a Mask or Distillery to Authenticity?
Christmas is presented around illuminated pines while a fat man dances in the snowscapes with reindeer. Likewise, Easter is marketed and #branded as happily fornicating bunnies, graciously pausing to offer excrement of chocolate, jelly, and marshmallow eggs. Millions of children are indoctrinated desensitized exposed.

These stories by far as preferred over the one which depicts a man's lifetime endeavors ended by greed and the depravity of lust for power, which is in turn used to bring about the frenzied, murderous rampaging intent of a mob. Who dare think that this type of depicted behavior could in fact be #truthful  or authentic. No -  It must be a mask.

The reality is, as I write you will never be sure if I am masked or unmasked.  Yet, with all the discourse and dialogue of opacity and what is revealed, whether factual or fictional; Ultimately it is meant to be identified with. You as the reader are faced with the questions I ask of myself.

As I stand in the midst of the endless forest, I realize that I am but an acorn scattered before the vast towering trees of data. Yet, in my masks of identity a seed is planted in which you know me as you would liken yourself to a best friend, companion, compatriot, attacker, or seditionist.

I sit once again and stare at this blank sheet before me. And in my peripheral vision sits an old and cherish artifact in the form of a McGuffey Reader from the late 19th century. Of all the things I learned from carefully turning each of it's slowly disintegrating pages in my youth was a lesson that still linger to this day. If I as a reader, do not feel the sting like a blow to the head, then I have wasted my time on your drivel.  And that time will never be returned. Thus, the first object of an intelligent writer is to awaken the attention of the reader.

So I ask those two words;
I am a writer of fiction. Am I? or did you find the subtle, nuance that makes you wonder?

I am a writer of fact. Am I? or are you encumbered by the preconceived stains of your own humanity that lead you to believe differently?
 
I am an annoying provocateur, running the gambit of humanities. Am I? or have you just been reunited with emotions you chose to bury, forget, or be reminded of?

I am being AUTHENTIC. Am I? or is what you take away merely a mask - repackaged and presented for some easily digestible, entertainment purpose?

~ owen

#disseminatingseeds   #essaybyowen   #authenticme  
17
2
Owen Ellis's profile photoMani Saint-Victor's profile photoCharles Payet's profile photoGrizwald Grim's profile photo
9 comments
 
+Owen Ellis There are seriously days, when I wish I didn't have a day job, and could just deliberately and intentionally try to keep up with you.  Since that won't happen, I just try to absorb as much as I can and wish that I could contribute more in return.

Sorry that I don't have anything more profound than that, but I'm reading while cooking dinner, then have my own writing and video to do after family time....maybe before bed, but heck, I still haven't had time to write a cogent follow-up response to +Iblis Bane . And then there's +Gina Fiedel 's lovely video and comment....

........anyway, just want to say THANK YOU for your writing and thoughts.  You always provoke and challenge and stimulate, and I am grateful to know you here, in whatever capacity you choose to let us know you.  Doesn't even matter if you're "inauthentic," because your ideas are.  :-D
 
Ah, there's just never enough time in the day is there +Charles Payet.  When I get home after 10 hours in the office,  my options are either read, go online (or write), game, or spend time with the better half.  I can only do one of them.  It's a hard choice sometimes. :D  which really annoys the GF. :D
 
Hi +Owen Ellis I feel compelled to comment as I have only plussed on your last several posts and I fear a plus without a comment may be worse than not plussing at all.

Did I only plus so you wouldn't have to feel the silence? (The dreaded influencer silence... although isn't it presumptuous of me to consider myself an influencer?) In that case, am I handing out my plusses like candy to pacify you?

Did I plus your earlier posts to indicate that I appreciated the mention you gave me (respectfully)? That I agreed with what you had to say? Was it a way to acknowledge the posts without having to actually taking the time to read and formulate a reply? Or is it that I read the post but secretly felt I lack the brain capacity necessary to keep up with you and the others who seem to have mastered a level of communication that I fear I have not yet and am unlikely to achieve?

Is not plussing a form of not seeing? A way of avoiding having to comment? A way for me to keep my mask on so as not to be revealed as ignorant, uninteresting or uneducated? Is it authentic of me to only comment when I feel I have something intelligent to say and can offer a meaningful contribution to the conversation?

If you had not mentioned me, forcing me to see, would I have plussed? What gives you the right to force me to take off my mask when I can easily hide behind it and pretend I don't see?
 
+Christine DeGraff my brain is still too foggy from being BC this morning aka #beforecoffee  , but I've certainly never considered the Plus 1 like that.  Very interesting take.

And BTW - every single time I read one of +Owen Ellis 's posts, I feel the same exact way about the level of communication and writing.  I have to keep reminding myself that I don't have to write that way, that I simply have a different style, but I still secretly wish that I could write that way.

Maybe part of my motivation in giving a Plus One to some of this posts, when I don't have the time to write a decent comment, is a little bit of admiration mixed with more than a little bit of jealousy.  Hmmmmmmm.......I think I'd better be AC aka #aftercoffee  before going any further down that rabbit hole.
 
+Christine DeGraff - Lesson and gentle nudge  duly noted (and still being deciphered)
My (lengthy and somewhat immediate) response is offered here: http://goo.gl/ep2imo

You really weren't expecting anything less of me, were you? ツ
 
+Charles Payet - Thanks again for your kindness, and the kindred spirit and challenges you mention are certainly a shared challenge (of which I face myself daily).

Whether it be BC ( #beforecoffee ) or AC ( #aftercoffee ) or ever DC ( #duringcoffee  endlessly flowing), I have been deeply enriched as well a challenged by many (both mentioned as well as not).

I would like to say that I am a better person for venturing down this field of endless rabbit holes and hollows - but some days, I am just too damn tired to think or absorb any more  ϡ
 
I like your public self-reflections - it wouldn't surprise me if they were unpopular, as many would prefer not to be prodded in that direction. What's interesting is that I find most of them comment worthy, but often I don't see a good 'in' to comment about. 
 
This entire googol-gooey, all the world is a stage, socialized media environment is perplexing at best (on a good day ) to me +Grizwald Grim 

One part is the Business Minded Models complete with "Top Producers/Contributors"  and a seemingly endless supply of "This Is How Best to Conduct Busine$$" or Top 5/10/<insert #> Ways To" lists.

I to some extent  do find an objective model and intrinsic value in these offerings. In the IT (or IT Support Services) Industry, one thing that is said often behind the security of a phone call just ended is the technician (or support staff) saying something along the lines of "GEEZUS! Did you even bother opening the enclosed manual???" 

However, the (overabundance?) of the same/similar models hiding behind a veil of   #collaboration  in an Attention Economy certainly does not react in a pleasing manner when asked about the true nature of MOST business. Out perform your competitor (in order to have a HIGHER Return on YOUR (My) Invested Time/Energy/Money). Yes - Build A Better Moustrap

So while these models of "how to get my pound of flesh" f(from a limited carcass) continue on their merry way (and seemingly perpetuate yet another bubble about burst), I tend personally to look to the philosophically minded: The Artists, the Poets, the Social Scientists (or "Soft Arts" Magicians) who actually explore and expose HUMANITY for what it is.

It is my strongly held personal belief  that these are the ones who will hold the key to the 21C and beyond, as that key will present an answer to preventing us (HUMANITY) From Ripping Each Other's F'ing Throats Out in order to be the lowly  #kingoftheanthill .
 
Haha, you certainly weren't exaggerating the provocateur part, were you +Owen Ellis?  And perhaps you judge this new collaborative model a touch harshly.  Now in principle, as we know, I heartily acknowledge the validity of the concern. 

But I think the difference between many of the ones already participating, and the ones whose possible behaviour you may cast doubts upon will be fairly readily apparent in the event. (You can already see some of them hitting the communities.)

Personally, I have hopes for this model.  Hopes which I freely admit I once dismissed, but have become if not probable, at least credible to me in the last few months.

And of course, a model which invests the participants with at least some personal responsibility is technically socially healthy.  The "Shylock" you imply forms an intrinsic part of the social fabric. Hell, if you want to get really creepy about it, so does the big G. ;)

But even as human nature remains, it is still vulnerable to paradigm shifts that can change its expression almost overnight. (Ok, well, not overnight. ;)  But even historically they have been able to sweep the globe within decades, and in this digital world...well...it's gonna be faster.)

And sometimes paradigm shifts can be driven.  And that is the potential I see, not for this platform specifically, (much as I enjoy it), but for the digital medium as a whole.  "As the twig is bent...

Call me an optimist if you will, (though many would be surprised, and I tease others about their own), but, to end with another platitude, "Of such inconsequential beginnings..." ;)

(This is probably why authenticity is such a burning question. ;) )
Add a comment...