Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Mind|Construct
10 followers -
The future is here, because we're creating it.
The future is here, because we're creating it.

10 followers
About
Communities and Collections
Posts

Post has shared content
Super Intelligence won't kill us!

Lately there's an abundance of media exposure covering the upcoming demise of the human race, brought to us by the impeding doom of Artificial Super Intelligence. The choir is being led by some pretty famous (and obviously intelligent) people like Stephen Hawking, Elon Musk and Bill Gates, just to name a few. However, there is an abundance of problems with both the presented viewpoints of afore mentioned ambassadors of AI-doom and equally the way that the press seems to pick up on those things and hype stuff they basically don't understand in the first place. Here's why...

The first and most obvious problem with the current press coverage of the AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) field of development is that there is almost NO actual AGI field of development. Although large corporations like IBM (Watson), Google (Deep Learning) and others like to paint the picture that they are really 'getting somewhere', the opposite is actually true; The stuff that those companies work on is only a small amount above the results that have been accomplished over the last many decades, and are therefore still at the level of 'pretty smart software' but nowhere near anything that resembles even the intelligence and capabilities of a little child. IBM's Watson is basically a very good search engine without any real cognitive abilities or capabilities for making actual decisions and Google's Deep Learning project is based on pattern recognition algorithms that where researched for decades already but still remain just that: pattern recognition. There is currently no actual research that gives any promise of 'artificial neural networks' (as used by Google and others) ever being capable of supporting higher orders of reasoning, let alone something like 'machine consciousness'.

The other big problem with 'fear for AI' is the simple fact that people tend to distrust that what they don't understand. And as soon as something (or someone) is more intelligent then we are, we see that as a thread instead of an opportunity (to learn). Hollywood has helped to strengthen this idea by linking the concept of 'highly intelligent' predominantly to the villain in the story: the evil genius. This predates the whole 'AI is dangerous' debate by decades or even more. So now the 'genius' is a machine and therefore a 'genius machine' must of course be evil. The actual reality, as we currently can observe in humans and is documented in many scientific studies, is that highly intelligent people tend to also have a higher sense of fairness and even justice, have a much more compassionate view on society and are driven to think about solutions rather then 'creating problems'. The logical expectation for Artificial Super Intelligence is for it to be able to think about anything and everything in much more detail and consideration, simply because that capacity goes hand in hand with 'having higher levels of intelligence'.

Finally, I don't really understand the positions and statements of people like the ones mentioned above. They are known for their intelligence, business acumen and in some cases scientific insights, but clearly fail to put current AI-developments into a sensible scope and time-frame and obviously don't seem to understand that 'intelligence' is not an isolated feat. Because the only way that we can achieve human-level Artificial Intelligence is to incorporate everything else that makes us human.

Post has attachment
Super Intelligence won't kill us!

Lately there's an abundance of media exposure covering the upcoming demise of the human race, brought to us by the impeding doom of Artificial Super Intelligence. The choir is being led by some pretty famous (and obviously intelligent) people like Stephen Hawking, Elon Musk and Bill Gates, just to name a few. However, there is an abundance of problems with both the presented viewpoints of afore mentioned ambassadors of AI-doom and equally the way that the press seems to pick up on those things and hype stuff they basically don't understand in the first place. Here's why...

The first and most obvious problem with the current press coverage of the AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) field of development is that there is almost NO actual AGI field of development. Although large corporations like IBM (Watson), Google (Deep Learning) and others like to paint the picture that they are really 'getting somewhere', the opposite is actually true; The stuff that those companies work on is only a small amount above the results that have been accomplished over the last many decades, and are therefore still at the level of 'pretty smart software' but nowhere near anything that resembles even the intelligence and capabilities of a little child. IBM's Watson is basically a very good search engine without any real cognitive abilities or capabilities for making actual decisions and Google's Deep Learning project is based on pattern recognition algorithms that where researched for decades already but still remain just that: pattern recognition. There is currently no actual research that gives any promise of 'artificial neural networks' (as used by Google and others) ever being capable of supporting higher orders of reasoning, let alone something like 'machine consciousness'.

The other big problem with 'fear for AI' is the simple fact that people tend to distrust that what they don't understand. And as soon as something (or someone) is more intelligent then we are, we see that as a thread instead of an opportunity (to learn). Hollywood has helped to strengthen this idea by linking the concept of 'highly intelligent' predominantly to the villain in the story: the evil genius. This predates the whole 'AI is dangerous' debate by decades or even more. So now the 'genius' is a machine and therefore a 'genius machine' must of course be evil. The actual reality, as we currently can observe in humans and is documented in many scientific studies, is that highly intelligent people tend to also have a higher sense of fairness and even justice, have a much more compassionate view on society and are driven to think about solutions rather then 'creating problems'. The logical expectation for Artificial Super Intelligence is for it to be able to think about anything and everything in much more detail and consideration, simply because that capacity goes hand in hand with 'having higher levels of intelligence'.

Finally, I don't really understand the positions and statements of people like the ones mentioned above. They are known for their intelligence, business acumen and in some cases scientific insights, but clearly fail to put current AI-developments into a sensible scope and time-frame and obviously don't seem to understand that 'intelligence' is not an isolated feat. Because the only way that we can achieve human-level Artificial Intelligence is to incorporate everything else that makes us human.
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Major milestone: POS-tagger implemented

The first important milestone of the prototype implementation has been reached: we have implemented a state-of-the-art 'Part of Speech tagger' (POS-tagger). This means that the system is now at the level of current NLP-research and is actually at the forefront of development in this area.
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
We are proud to present ASTRID, our new mascotte for the company. She is a 3D render, made with the Blender 3D software. From now on you will find her on all our company presentations and communications.
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
We are happy to announce the latest addition to the MIND|CONSTRUCT team; Patrick van Hove has joined as member of the development team, running the training-program for our newly developed 'Part-of-Speech' tagging system.
Add a comment...

Post has attachment

Post has attachment
Today we launched our 'new' website. Although you might not spot the difference with our previous website incarnation, a lot has actually changed. We have build a new dedicated CMS from scratch, that is ultimately geared towards the specific information that we want to publish on our website.
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Photo
Add a comment...
Wait while more posts are being loaded