Cover photo
Verified name
Mike Elgan
Lives in Petaluma, California
4,369,295 followers|478,530,741 views


Mike Elgan

Shared publicly  - 
You saw this Google Maps hack, right? Here's how they did it!
Karri Huhtanen's profile photoAnthony Sampson's profile photoHanna Hirsch's profile photoAlex H's profile photo
Add a comment...

Mike Elgan

Shared publicly  - 
Comcast killed its deal with Time-Warner Cable. What are they going to do next?

Comcast this week announced that they're ending their $45 billion bid for Time Warner Cable, after getting stiff resistance from both the Department of Justice and the Federal Communications Commission. The combined companies would have controlled 57 percent of the nation’s broadband market and just under 30 percent of pay television service in an industry that's conspicuous for a lack of competition in most markets. 

But they're still out there. Any predictions about what they're going to do now?

Rob Hill's profile photoChristopher Yost's profile photoErnie Stevens's profile photoMichael Keith Cooper's profile photo
Didn't a Microsoft deal with Comcast already fall through before the Xbox One release?
Add a comment...

Mike Elgan

Shared publicly  - 
My wife has amazing hair.
Tasnim Trisha's profile photoShazadur Rahman's profile photoWasim Nashed's profile photoBuddhika Ranchagoda's profile photo
I would tend to agree.
Add a comment...

Mike Elgan

Shared publicly  - 
Bison tacos!

With home-made tortillas!
Moises Moron's profile photoDavid Sternberg's profile phototien nguyenthithanh's profile photoJulia Laíres's profile photo
The difference is you can't wash your face in a Buffalo! 
Add a comment...

Mike Elgan

Shared publicly  - 
Oklahoma now has more earthquakes than California (due to fracking).

This, according to a new report by the United States Geological Survey.

A United States Geological Survey report identifies 17 regions with significant levels of “induced seismicity,” mostly from oil and gas drilling. The two worst hit areas are centered in Oklahoma.
María del Mar Sánchez Mansilla's profile photoDIANNA BONILLA-MARQUEZ's profile photoWill Hill's profile photoC. Anthony Esposito II's profile photo
recently, earthquake is happening everywhere,couple day age,earthquake happened in China too, many people died.
Add a comment...

Mike Elgan

Shared publicly  - 
KITT, from Knight Rider, just shipped for the Apple Watch!

Remember KITT, the dashboard-based artificial intelligence self-driving car computer from the 1982 TV series, Knight Rider? Well now he's available on the Apple Watch. Car not included.
Eric Beyer's profile photoDano Ferguson's profile photoKyle Ka Hei Ho's profile photoJadwiga Wróbel's profile photo
Actually, Apple devices owners don't waste time bashing away Android users, we do respect their choice and we let them live their life as they wish, is Android good for them? Good!, have you realized how many Android users waste their time trashing Apple instead of boosting their productivity using their android devices? Woooow... 
Add a comment...
Have him in circles
4,369,295 people
luis romero's profile photo
Alona Tro's profile photo
Dawn Turner's profile photo
aliou sy's profile photo
Anna Imran's profile photo
Alexander Oppliger's profile photo
Jael Paulino's profile photo
Mireyi Rosado's profile photo
Filip Dinov's profile photo

Mike Elgan

Shared publicly  - 
iFixit tore apart an Apple Watch. Here's what they discovered. 

The gadget repair tool and parts company iFixit did another one of their famous tear-downs. This time, they flew to Australia where it's the future to tear apart a brand-new Apple Watch. 

+Christina Warren and I interviewed one of iFixit Teardown Engineers, Jeoff Wacker, to find out more:

#AppleWatch #iFixit
Stewart Darco's profile photoAnthony Sampson's profile photoNino Angelo Diosan's profile photopatrickconstant valton's profile photo
how are sweet
Add a comment...

Mike Elgan

Shared publicly  - 
And so it begins.
I think I'm getting over my Apple addiction. The clasp opened when I was taking my hand out of my pants pocket. Apple wants $229 to fix a $350 watch. What a screw. 
5 comments on original post
Florian Sauvestre's profile photoηαζ ზηαςτ Nai Gnast's profile photoMindaugas Stambrauskas's profile photoAlan Meilinger's profile photo
+Mike Elgan I think this is BS. I looked at this guys' profile and he seems to be firmly an Android user. He also says he was going to be charged almost as much as the watch costs to get it fixed, which sounds fishy.  
Add a comment...

Mike Elgan

Shared publicly  - 
Why Twitter is risky business.

(Read my column: )

Twitter unveiled multiple new features this week aimed at curbing trolling, threats and harassment.

As other social networks have improved anti-troll features, Twitter has remained a laggard, so the trolls have made Twitter their social network of choice. You'll notice that in the past couple of years, nearly all the worst stories about online harassment have really been about Twitter, not about social networks generally.

Famous people such as Ashley Judd, Lena Dunham and Iggy Azalea have been relentlessly hounded by vicious trolls. Many have left Twitter altogether–some temporarily; others permanently.

Gamergate targets, including Zoe Quinn, Anita Sarkeesian and Breanna Wu, are bombarded constantly and heavily with the most horrific, personal and threatening attacks you could image.

For business professionals, a more likely problem with Twitter is potential harm to reputation. The two can be related.

And what they have in common are trolls and haters and the inadequacy of the tools on Twitter to deal with them.

Here's why I don't recommend Twitter for anyone concerned about reputation management:

#Twitter   #trolls   #trolling   #reputationmanagement  
Gene Chiu's profile photoMilan Mody's profile photoAndy Meek's profile photoPeter Soeth's profile photo
"It's hard to really communicate complete thoughts in 140-character chunks." This is the reason I hardly ever use Twitter.
Add a comment...

Mike Elgan

Shared publicly  - 
Steve Denning reveals how clueless he is about Google+... again!

Pro tip: If you want serious traffic to your column, say Google+ is dead. Your page will be hammered by hoards of passionate Google+ fans who come to disagree with you. 

It's a lesson Steve Denning learned for his first "Google+ is dead" column, so now he's back for another helping of Google+ traffic in his latest missive, called "Has Google+ really died?"

(I'm not criticizing Denning -- yet! -- I myself drive huge traffic from Google+ to my own columns. That's because Google+ is very much alive.) 

Anyway, Denning launches into a defense of his first column, but succeeds mainly in demonstrating a profound ignorance about Google+. 

I'm here to help. 

Here's what Steve Denning got wrong: 

1. Assuming public posts = active use.

Denning is relying on a spectacularly useless metric for defining active use, which is public posting (by relying on the Stone Temple Consulting report).

It doesn't take into account the default kind of post, which is non-public. A huge number of users have stage fright about posting publicly, and a probably even huger number don't know their posts are public. (If you want to criticize Google+, here's one criticism you can levy -- the whole Public vs. Circles posting issue is confusing to new users.) 

It doesn't take into account people who mainly or exclusively engage through comments. Because Google+ organizes posts differently than, say, Twitter, comments are not viewed as "posts," even though people are fully engaged in social interaction through comments. If I comment on something posted on Twitter, my comment is counted as a full-blown "post" or Tweet. If I post the same comment to the same post on Google+, my comment is not counted as anything by Stone Temple. 

It doesn't take into account people who mainly "consume" content without commenting much, even though they feel they're active users of Google+. 

2. Trying to have it both ways on the accidental "users."

Denning again goes astray by relying on Stone Temple's skewed messaging on their report. Yes, when you get a Google password for some other Google property, that counts as a Google+ account. So most of the 2.2 billion Google users aren't really Google+ users in actual fact. They then go on to use "randomly selected" profiles knowing full well that most of these are non users. 

You can't have it both ways. Either they're users to be counted as users, in which case Google+ is vastly bigger than Facebook -- or they're non users, and not to be counted in numbers about how active the average "user" is. 

3. Failing to appreciate the nature of the Google+ "cult."

Denning points out that many comments on his first column "seemed to resemble that of people defending a struggling religious cult, rather than the users of a mere software tool."

The gratuitous word "struggling" is passive-aggressive spin to support his narrative. But the point is well taken. Google+ people sound like a cult. Just like Apple fans. Or Android fans. Or Reddit users. 

Unlike Twitter or Facebook, Google has created an army of truly passionate users. 

In fact Apple is a perfect comparison. Apple has less than 7% of the global PC market. Does anyone say Apple's PC business is "dead"? No, because they have the highest-quality PCs and laptops and the highest-quality customers (in terms of income and education levels) -- exactly like Google+. 

Nobody likes to hear me say this, but Google+ is the Apple of social networks. (Actually, I think Guy Kawasaki was first to say something like this.) 

It's not a place like Facebook for grandma to post cat photos. And it's not a place like Twitter for people to speak in hashtag code and URLs. It's the only place where you can pursue your passions will brilliant, like-minded people who are truly interested in the same things you are. 

Yes: Google+ is a "cult." Only the highest quality tech products produce "cults." 

4. Equating tech press echo chamber bias with the "emerging consensus."

Denning trots out a smattering of Google+ hater headlines to provide "evidence" for the "emerging consensus" about Google+. (And check the numbers: Those articles got HUGE traffic from the Google+ "cult," too.)

As I've said many times, the press hates Google+ precisely BECAUSE it's not a ghost town. Any post on Google+ by a prominent writer will be greeted by long, well thought-out criticisms, challenging the writer's assumptions and calling the writer out for mistakes. Google+ isn't easy and breezy for public writers like Twitter and even Facebook are. 

This is the last thing a journalist wants after writing and editing all day. 

What the tech press wants is Twitter, where they can dash off quick and clever lines off the top of their heads (like this one: ) that will be neither challenged nor heavily discussed. 

That's why the tech press feels so threatened by Google+. There's too much going on: too much argument, too much to read. And so they've been out to kill it from the beginning. 

5. Equating dismantling with abandonment.

Denning quotes more Twitter-loving echo chamber journalists who assume Google spinning off things like Hangouts or Photos would be evidence for neglect and decline. (These are the same kind of journalists who said that Google moving Glass into its own product group meant that they're killing it.) It's all just wishful thinking by Plus haters in the press.

Fact is, the unnatural integration of everything years ago was just a strategy Google was trying. It didn't have the desired effect, honked off a bunch of people who didn't want things to be integrated, so now they've changed the strategy. 

The experience of using Google+, and the benefits, haven't changed one bit. (In fact, It would be improved by further de-coupling, specifically if YouTube and their trolls were surgically removed.)

6. Pretending to have tried Google+.

Denning says his "own efforts to love Google+ were unsuccessful." Looking at his profile, I see that he's posted publicly twice ever, hasn't even filled out his profile or even uploaded a profile banner pic. Running a search, I see that he doesn't engage with comments or communities. 

Steve Denning is a non-user. He has NOT made an effort to love Google+. I imagine if he had only posted two tweets on Twitter, he wouldn't understand that social network either. 

And this item is related to....

7. Completely failing to understand Google+ fan opposition to yet another non-user saying Google+ is dead.

Denning is making the mistake of publically making the same mistake many people have before. As I've pointed out many times, you cannot understand the power and the glory of Google+ unless you really use it. 

Denning is just another Arthur Spooner:

Denning and other Arthur Spooners are confused about why Google+ fans have an issue with this phenomenon. And so I'm going to make it so clear that nobody who reads this can retain their confusion. Here goes. 

1. Google+ is the best social anything ever. 

2. This can be only understood if you're truly active on G+ for weeks or months. 

3. Influential writers who have not taken the time to understand have slammed Google+ from a place of ignorance. 

4. Because this has been repeated so many times, many, many people think Google+ is "bad" in some way. 

5. Bottom line: Ignorant people are the biggest threat to Google+, and are hurting the reputation of best social anything ever. 

Is that clear enough? 

8. Failing to appreciate the importance of Google+ for Google itself.

Google isn't going to kill Google+ because the site provides huge benefits for the company. 

First, Google+ is a necessary social component for Google's wearable computing platforms -- you know, the future of computing? 

Google Glass and Android Wear and future initiatives rely heavily on Google+ for understanding user social graphs, displaying birthdays, sharing photos and videos and much more. 

Google+ is a great platform for Google employees, engineers and executives to brainstorm, announce things, and learn about their most passionate fans and users. (Where else would they do this, Facebook?)

Google+ is still useful for cultivating the most passionate fans of Google itself, as well as Android. Google+ puts the "cult" in cultivating. Google would be insane to cut their most loyal, passionate and enthusiastic users off at the knees. 

In a nutshell, Steve Denning is just plain wrong about Google+. 

(Photo is massively unrelated to the post)
Enes Ipop's profile photoZeke Cao's profile photoAri S's profile photoVenu Gopal B's profile photo
2700 followers with 9.6Mil views... Clearly I'm being followed and stalked by people who don't exist. Some people are just stubborn AND ignorant. 
Add a comment...

Mike Elgan

Shared publicly  - 
BREAKING: Comcast calls off Time Warner Cable deal!
Edward Holland's profile photoGerry Doyon's profile photoGiovanni Panaro's profile photoErnie Stevens's profile photo
All I can say is, "YAY!"
Add a comment...

Mike Elgan

Shared publicly  - 
Mmmmmmmm. Pie!

+Amira Elgan just baked this apple pie!! 
sor hernandez's profile photoHeber Márquez's profile photoEl Khawdi Hamid's profile photoMandar Kumta's profile photo
Add a comment...
Have him in circles
4,369,295 people
luis romero's profile photo
Alona Tro's profile photo
Dawn Turner's profile photo
aliou sy's profile photo
Anna Imran's profile photo
Alexander Oppliger's profile photo
Jael Paulino's profile photo
Mireyi Rosado's profile photo
Filip Dinov's profile photo
Map of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has lived
Petaluma, California
New York, USA - Florence, Italy - Madrid, Spain - Marrakesh, Morocco - Sparta, Greece - Kusadasi, Turkey - Istanbul, Turkey - Nairobi, Kenya - Barcelona, Spain - Valencia, Spain
The world's only lovable technology journalist.
Who the $#@! is Mike Elgan? 

I write and talk and interview on the subjects technology and innovation. I anchor TWiT's daily Tech News Today netcast ( 

My opinion columns appear all over the place, most frequently Computerworld, PC World, InfoWorld, MacWorld, CIO Magazine, the San Francisco Chronicle, eWeek, Baseline and elsewhere. 

I don't do "access journalism." I am not in the industry, I'm not an investor or entrepreneur, but instead an independent, disinterested observer with strong opinions. (I have nothing against access journalism, it's just not what I do.)

My Thoughts on Google+:

After 10 years of blogging with conventional blogging sites and services, I abandoned that approach a year ago and started blogging on Google+. Why? Because Google+ is by far the best blogging platform. As Tim O'Reily said, it's like Tumblr 2.0, but more social. 

I also cancelled my account with a leading photo-sharing and management site, and now use Google+ for that exclusively. 

I've replaced more than half my email communication with Google+ communication.

I use Google+ to write first drafts of my stories, to crowdsource, to take polls, to get feedback and to drive traffic to the articles I write. It has dramatically improved my work as a writer. 

I even use Google+ for social networking!

Although I'm most active on Google+, you can also follow me here: 

And you can download my top 200 most popular posts as an eBook by clicking here.

I'm ranked #1 on the Google Plus Score list, which is based on user engagement.

I'm the #7 Most Recommended Person to Follow on Google+ (as voted by users). 

I'm one of Mashable's top nine Google+ Power Users.

I'm also a "Curator" on the Google Currents app!! (Please install the free app and "Add" me!)

I've also created and moderate these Google+ communities.

Here's how I do Google+: 

In the meantime, please CIRCLE ME! I'd love to interact with you here on Google+. 
Bragging rights
I'm a digital nomad. I live everywhere.
News Director, News Anchor, Writer, Author
Writing, broadcasting
Basic Information
Other names
Apps with Google+ Sign-in
Luma Fitness cost us $232 per class. Here's why. My wife and I signed up for a year at Luma fitness at the beginning of last year. Luma Fitness limits the number of students per class. You have to sign up. If the class is full, you can't take that class. And the classes are usually full. You can see this for yourself. For example, when I wrote this review on Saturday morning, you can see from my screenshot that every Sunday class that takes place at the gym is already full. (The only available classes are a trail running class -- we already trail run every day and don't need to pay a gym for that -- and a second class that's way above our fitness level.) We work during the day, and want to work out after work. Those classes are the most unavailable, especially the ones at our fitness level. We're very busy, and often had a hard time making time for the gym. But when we did find the time, we found that Luma Fitness classes were already full. Because of that, we were able to attend only 10 classes for the year. We paid them $2,148 and used their gym 10 times. The nightmare continued. Our membership ended at the end of January. You have to give 30 days notice in writing to terminate the membership, which we did on January 6. Yet they're charging us for the full month of February. We called and argued with them about it, but they were horrible and nasty and insisted that we pay the full month, rather than honor their own contract of 30 days notice. They KNOW we won't be using their gym for the month of February. They KNOW we paid them thousands of dollars without using their service much. But they are just taking our $179 for the month anyway. I guess the $2,148 we paid for 10 classes wasn't enough, so they took more. So now our grand total is $2,327 for 10 classes. Instead of going to Luma Fitness, just flush $20 bills down the toilet twice a week. You'll save money, and you'll get more exercise.
• • •
Public - 3 months ago
reviewed 3 months ago
Shirley rules!
Public - 7 months ago
reviewed 7 months ago
Everything we tried at this restaurant was incredible. What a gem.
Public - 8 months ago
reviewed 8 months ago
Awesome location and great coffee completely ruined by freezing room temperature and mind-bogglingly slow Internet connect (it took me three minutes to load this page before I could write a review).
Public - a year ago
reviewed a year ago
31 reviews
This is a really good restaurant. The food is very flavorful without being fatty and heavy. Great service.
Public - 8 months ago
reviewed 8 months ago
Awesome. Simply awesome.
Public - a year ago
reviewed a year ago
OK, I'm going to say something VERY controversial here. But it's my opinion that Pizzateca has the world's best pizza. As the author of the book _American Pie_ says, the world's best pizza is usually the one you grew up with. However, I have eaten at Bianco's Pizzeria in Phoenix, all the highest rated pizza places in New York, Los Angeles and elsewhere, and this is the best I've had. Most of the best places in America nail the toppings but fail on crust. They tend to use yeast-based leavening, which can only get you so far. Pizzateca, on the other hand, is doing something magical with the crust that involves 3 days of fermentation, according to the owner. Specifically, Pizzateca's muchroom and garlic pizza is truly mind-blowing. Please, do NOT fail to eat at this tiny joint if you're anywhere near Madrid, Spain.
• • •
Public - a year ago
reviewed a year ago