Shared publicly  - 
 
6
1
Mark Milley's profile photoLiz Quilty's profile photoMarc Paul Rubin's profile photoHowlin' Hobbit's profile photo
14 comments
 
That's totally relevant. Thanks, George.
 
Good luck with that Olympic Committee. If nobody linked to them or talked about them, they'd find out that it might not pay to try to be so controlling.
 
My taxes paid for this???? THANKS NOBAMA
 
Wow. You're sure collecting the trolls tonight, Liz.
 
I know you're probably going to delete Poon Tard's stupid comment, making mine look kinda out of sync but, much as I could possibly rant on things I dislike about the hopey changey guy, is this fool really stupid enough to think that US taxes are paying for the London Olympics official site and policies?

really?
 
People think I am crazy but they'll see when its revealed secret Kenyans won all those running events.
 
Did you learn that by studying the back of a dollar bill?
 
You know, most server-side scripts could check the Referrer, and block visitors based on blacklists / whitelists. Stupid yes, though easily done.
 
+Marc Paul Rubin I wouldn't be surprised if the organisation of the games indeed has scripts to check the links, although I doubt they will block those links automatically.
I imagine them keeping a log, and just suing the hell out of organisations that try to associate themselves with the games without having paid for it.
 
Good point about them checking the links +Bart Kuivenhoven, rather than blocking. Suing, or at least issuing threats, for misrepresentation would be right up their alley. Of course that's a different issue from the one raised by BoingBoing. BTW an issue of missing G+ notifications has resurfaced for me on this post, so I apologize in advance if I miss comments here.
Add a comment...