6 plus ones
Shared publicly•View activity
- Jun 13, 2012
- This article reads very much like the early goals and objectives of the Music Genome project, which later became the basis for Pandora. I haven't seen the Pandora data set in many years. However, if memory serves, Pandora uses a checklist/questionnaire of 400 musical characteristics that are classified by human analysts (often musicians) against each song in their catalog.
The resulting analysis is then used as a collaborative filtering algorithm for "channels" and recommendations within Pandora.Jun 14, 2012
- Bloody hell. That "research" ranks as one of the all-time most absurdly uninformed wastes of effort. Reading that article actually encourages ignorance.
Seriously: if a reader knows very little about music, reading that article would reduce their understanding of it. It's the musical theory equivalent of a history lesson from Sarah Palin.Jun 14, 2012
- -- yes, that pronouncement was quite a shocker! I'm glad they said "accidentals" rather than "sharpy flatty things." lolz
Their effort could improve -- perhaps far enough to produce a net knowledge gain for some readers -- in any of several simple ways.
Two trivially obvious examples...
Possibly interesting: "I analyzed the
chordsKEY AND KEY CHANGES of 1300 popular songs for patterns."
Possibly valuable: "I analyzed the chords of 1300 popular songs IN THE SAME KEY for patterns."
Both could still be misleading to the novice -- and flaky from any educated standpoint -- but less harmful to the reader.Jun 14, 2012
- Absolutely nothing here that should surprise anybody who's got even a basic understanding of music theory.Jun 14, 2012