For the fourth of fifth time, my Toxic Reverend profile is being reviewed again to see if it complies with the Google+ Names Policy.
Reviews are usually completed within a few days. In the meantime, I have full access to Google+ and all other Google services. My question is how many times do I have to endure this ? Being that I am legally blind, I am getting rather fed up with this and would think that the records of my prior responses and subsequent approvals of being able to use "Toxic Reverend" because I am known by far more people by that name than my ral name would have been enough to prevent this repeat, if they had been checked. This is now bordering on harassment, +Larry Page
I do find it a bit more than coincidental that this re-evaluation comes so soon after my posting a comment at your profile, as comments # 114 and # 116 athttps://plus.google.com/u/0/106189723444098348646/posts/jYXg8uNZV5j
Some of that was also posted on my profile at my profile asHow Google Is Helping the Gas Lobby Support Fracking
By Michael Corcoran, Truthout | News Analysis Thursday, 15 November 2012https://plus.google.com/u/0/111485701979929741583/posts/bRSJ5zr6FKq With the posted question
Toxic Comment and question to +Larry Page >
Was that, "Do No Evil" - unless ya can make some big bucks at it ?Or was Google conned into this Fracking mess, too ?How about you just answer the questions, +Larry Page ?
The facts are that neither one of us would be the first to be "duped" by
all of the bad and slanted information created by "bought science".
And that is one of the reason 52 Nobel Laureates have signed on to
In reference:The Integrity In Science Program with 52 Nobel Laureateshttp://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/
Defend scientific integrity and prevent political interference in science.
Groups Organizing To Address Scientific Integrity http://bit.ly/bph1Wj