I liked a lot this paper's categorization of meditative practices into attentional (roughly, concentration and control of attention), constructive (roughly, ones that work "inside the system", e.g. metta), and deconstructive (roughly, insight, e.g. vipassana); as they note, attentional practices are a prerequisite and enable the deconstructive ones, but are nevertheless a distinct thing.

> Scientific research highlights the central role of specific psychological processes, in particular those related to the self, in various forms of human suffering and flourishing. This view is shared by Buddhism and other contemplative and humanistic traditions, which have developed meditation practices to regulate these processes. Building on a previous paper in this journal, we propose a novel classification system that categorizes specific styles of meditation into attentional, constructive, and deconstructive families based on their primary cognitive mechanisms. We suggest that meta-awareness, perspective taking and cognitive reappraisal, and self-inquiry may be important mechanisms in specific families of meditation and that alterations in these processes may be used to target states of experiential fusion, maladaptive self-schema, and cognitive reification.
Shared publiclyView activity