Haha, you're too funny. Let's try this again. It is my conjecture that MS complied with local laws between the years 2010 and 2015. Further, it has been established that those laws include provisions for electronic surveillance. Therefore MS must have also remained compliant since they continue to profit on their business under those local laws. But hey, since this is the internet, and you say Microsoft does not have to obey local laws despite them saying that they are quite happy to do so, therefore it must be true, you must be right, I failed to research your opinion and the argument is closed. Congratulations, Sir.
Add a comment...