Cover photo
Jeffrey Mudge
Attended Indiana University


Jeffrey Mudge

Shared publicly  - 
Great goal! 
Obafemi Martins has shown a tendency to score memorable, high-quality goals since his arrival in Major League Soccer, and he added to that reputation at Dick's Sporting Goods Park on Saturday nigh
Add a comment...

Jeffrey Mudge

Shared publicly  - 
This is a weird experience. I have an interactive Bash Shell running in an Ubuntu Docker ( container that was installed with Ansible ( on a Vagrant ( Ubuntu VM using VirtualBox on my MacBook. It's kind of like Inception for operating systems.  

Now that I've got to this point I need to back up a bit and figure out how to actually run an apache server in the docker container, instead of a bash shell. 

And then I need to back up and figure out how to get Ansible to create said apache server in Docker and then tear it down again.  

I think I could get used to these 3 tools (Ansible, Vagrant, and Docker) though. The ease of creating and destroying test environments is pretty cool and the automation aspects of Ansible are very promising, especially since they don't require a client to be installed on the managed machines, just the controller. 
Add a comment...

Jeffrey Mudge

Shared publicly  - 
Like the Mistborn series? Like dice? A cross section there of?  

Crafty Games did a good job with the Mistborn Adventure Game, so I think these dice will probably be pretty good. Plus if enough people back it, you'll get the ebook version of the rules for Mistborn Adventure Game.
Dice for fans of Brandon Sanderson's Mistborn and the Mistborn Adventure Game
Add a comment...

Jeffrey Mudge

Shared publicly  - 
I've been hoping #gamergate would go away, and people could just enjoy their games again, but it hasn't. This sums it up pretty well. Games journalism is pretty broken, but nothing that is being done in this "movement" has anything to do with it. I have not seen any legitimate discussion of journalistic ethics from members that condemn the death threats or the unacceptable behavior that has characterized it. As the man says, if you want to do good community work, you'd be better off starting your own movement rather than joining the KKK since everything you do will be tainted otherwise.  

Also, how rich is it to claim you are outraged by journalistic ethics breaches, while engaging in some of the worst anti-journalist ethics type behavior such as censoring and driving out dissenting voices via death threats and hacking? The solution to bad journalism is good journalism, not harassment. 

It's usually pretty easy to distinguish between trolls that are attempting to act like they are part of a group in order sow discord and hatred, and those who are genuinely part of the group. In this case, all we can see is hate. That is what defines this "movement".  So if you have good intentions and are loosely associating with it? Get out now. You'll be glad you did.  
It's come to my attention that I haven't yet made a public statement specifically about #GamerGate. But as it's come up in a few threads, at this point, I think it's about time that I made my position on this matter absolutely clear.

"GamerGate" is a lie from beginning to end. It has exactly three parts to it: it has its core, which is and has been from the very first day about allowing and preserving a "gamer culture" which is actively hostile to women (among others), and preserving it by means of threats, harassment, and violence towards anyone who ever suggests that it should be otherwise.

It has its bullshit layer, which is that it is about ethics in journalism. If it were about ethics in journalism, then you would see people talking about actual ethical questions in journalism, and you would have seen it from the beginning. But from its first days, its only ties to this notion were the use of bizarre (and provably false) accusations from Zoe Quinn's ex-boyfriend to accuse game journalists of being in a cabal to destroy the "gamer culture" of its core layer, and one listserv thread (as covered on where professional journalists did, indeed, have a serious discussion about journalistic ethics: about whether the newsworthiness of this blog post outweighed the potential harm to its subjects. But rather than portray this as journalists doing what ethical journalists do, Milo Yiannopoulos instead portrayed this as a conspiracy by journalists to support the Secret Feminist Cabal. That is, his article itself was bollocks from beginning to end, as has been the entire argument.

And it has its fellow-travelers, people who either actually believe the bullshit layer or do so vocally and disingenuously in order to confuse others and add a shroud of legitimacy.

How do I know that this is true, and that there is not a legitimate discourse mixed in with the violence and so on? That I am not unfairly tarring all of GamerGate's proponents with the same brush?

It's really simple. I have not once seen a proponent of GamerGate actually distance themselves from the hatred and violence, or excoriate it, or say that it is fundamentally wrong and that they do not agree with either its means or its ends.

What I have seen is lots of people coming up with ways in which they, too, are being harassed, and so claiming a false equivalency. I got to watch an excellent example of this on one of my own threads earlier today; there, one of its proponents argued that the movement being called a bunch of scum (as it had been by someone else) is a form of harassment, and perfect evidence of how “there are trolls on both sides.” Yet he elides the difference between that and people being chased out of their homes, people waking up every day to death threats, to real and meaningful impact on people's lives. This is not a serious argument: it is an attempt to lie and to confuse the issue.

The other argument I have kept hearing is “I never distance myself from acts I have never associated myself with.” That is, people claim that they are under no obligation to distance themselves from the acts of the rest of GamerGate, even while they hoist its banner. Sorry: when a movement is known, first and foremost, for its violence, then to associate yourself with it does associate you with its acts. You cannot say “I support al-Qaeda. They’re really about the US military presence in Saudi Arabia,” or “Hey, the KKK has done a lot of great community service work,” and not thereby associate yourself with everything those organizations are really known for. Sorry; you lie down with pigs, you’ll get covered in mud. You keep doing that, and people will have every reason to assume that you like it.

The fact is that there is no meaningful way to "recapture" the GamerGate tag for anything honest, both because it was never tied to that in the first place, and because it has become far too polluted to do so. If someone actually feels like having a conversation about ethics in journalism, they should by all means do so -- depending on what they say, I may even support them in this. But they should not do so in the company of villains, because that simply obscures any real discussion they might want to have with filth.

This is not behavior worthy of human beings. It is vile, it is violent, and if there is anything legitimate at all inside GamerGate, it needs to get its ass out of there right now and clearly separate itself from the bloodthirsty mob. Because right now, anyone who walks around with that label is painting themselves as being open supporters of it, and anyone who supports that is someone that I wouldn't piss on if they were on fire.
498 comments on original post
Jeffrey Mudge's profile photo
Plenty? I don't think so. Is that 5%? 20%? A few tokens doesn't change the fact that the bulk of the movement is hostile to women, especially women with a voice.

Also, "they are corrupt" does not justify threats of death and violence and exposing private personal information.

No side in a public conflict is ever above reproach. There are always a few bad apples. But are you seriously telling me that you see the two sides as equivalent? 
Add a comment...

Jeffrey Mudge

Shared publicly  - 
Costa Rica advances! 

A man down for at least 50 minutes and they held on to win it in penalties! Amazing.  
Add a comment...

Jeffrey Mudge

Shared publicly  - 

I can't wait to try it.  Now if only I could do this for World Cup games.  
If you can't get enough soccer on TV this summer, you'll love MLS LIVE with Chromecast. MLS Matchday, the league's official app for Android and iOS, is now ready for Chromecast. MLS LIVE s
Add a comment...

Jeffrey Mudge

Shared publicly  - 
The purpose of DRM that most people don't recognize.
Discussions about DRM often land on the fundamental problem with DRM: that it doesn't work, or worse, that it is in fact mathematically impossible to make it work. The argument goes as follows:

1. The purpose of DRM is to prevent people from copying content while allowing people to view that content,

2. You can't hide something from someone while showing it to them,

3. And in any case widespread copyright violations (e.g. movies on file sharing sites) often come from sources that aren't encrypted in the first place, e.g. leaks from studios.

It turns out that this argument is fundamentally flawed. Usually the arguments from pro-DRM people are that #2 and #3 are false. But no, those are true. The problem is #1 is false.

The purpose of DRM is not to prevent copyright violations.

The purpose of DRM is to give content providers leverage against creators of playback devices.

Content providers have leverage against content distributors, because distributors can't legally distribute copyrighted content without the permission of the content's creators. But if that was the only leverage content producers had, what would happen is that users would obtain their content from those content distributors, and then use third-party content playback systems to read it, letting them do so in whatever manner they wanted.

Here are some examples:

A. Paramount make a movie. A DVD store buys the rights to distribute this movie from Paramount, and sells DVDs. You buy the DVD, and want to play it. Paramount want you to sit through some ads, so they tell the DVD store to put some ads on the DVD labeled as "unskippable".

Without DRM, you take the DVD and stick it into a DVD player that ignores "unskippable" labels, and jump straight to the movie.

With DRM, there is no licensed player that can do this, because to create the player you need to get permission from Paramount -- or rather, a licensing agent created and supported by content companies, DVD-CCA -- otherwise, you are violating some set of patents, anti-circumvention laws, or both.

B. Columbia make a movie. Netflix buys the rights to distribute this movie from Columbia, and sells access to the bits of the movie to users online. You get a Netflix subscription. Columbia want you to pay more if you want to watch it simultaneously on your TV and your phone, so they require that Netflix prevent you from doing this.

Now. You are watching the movie upstairs with your family, and you hear your cat meowing at the door downstairs.

Without DRM, you don't have to use Netflix's software, so maybe just pass the feed to some multiplexing software, which means that you can just pick up your phone, tell it to stream the same movie, continue watching it while you walk downstairs to open the door for the cat, come back upstairs, and turn your phone off, and nobody else has been inconvenienced and you haven't missed anything.

With DRM, you have to use Netflix's software, so you have to play by their rules. There is no licensed software that will let you multiplex the stream. You could watch it on your phone, but then your family misses out. They could keep watching, but then you miss out. Nobody is allowed to write software that does anything Columbia don't want you to do. Columbia want the option to charge you more when you go to let your cat in, even if they don't actually make it possible yet.

C. Fox make a movie. Apple buys the rights to sell it on iTunes. You buy it from iTunes. You want to watch it on your phone. Fox want you to buy the movie again if you use anything not made by Apple.

Without DRM, you just transfer it to your phone and watch it, since the player on any phone, whether made by Apple or anyone else, can read the video file.

With DRM, only Apple can provide a licensed player for the file. If you're using any phone other than an iPhone, you cannot watch it, because nobody else has been allowed to write software that decrypts the media files sold by Apple.

In all three cases, nobody has been stopped from violating a copyright. All three movies are probably available on file sharing sites. The only people who are stopped from doing anything are the player providers -- they are forced to provide a user experience that, rather than being optimised for the users, puts potential future revenues first (forcing people to play ads, keeping the door open to charging more for more features later, building artificial obsolescence into content so that if you change ecosystem, you have to purchase the content again).

Arguing that DRM doesn't work is, it turns out, missing the point. DRM is working really well in the video and book space. Sure, the DRM systems have all been broken, but that doesn't matter to the DRM proponents. Licensed DVD players still enforce the restrictions. Mass market providers can't create unlicensed DVD players, so they remain a black or gray market curiosity. DRM failed in the music space not because DRM is doomed, but because the content providers sold their digital content without DRM, and thus enabled all kinds of players they didn't expect (such as "MP3" players). Had CDs been encrypted, iPods would not have been able to read their content, because the content providers would have been able to use their DRM contracts as leverage to prevent it.

DRM's purpose is to give content providers control over software and hardware providers, and it is satisfying that purpose well.

As a corollary to this, look at the companies who are pushing for DRM. Of the ones who would have to implement the DRM, they are all companies over which the content providers already, without DRM, have leverage: the companies that both license content from the content providers and create software or hardware players. Because they license content, the content providers already have leverage against them: they can essentially require them to be pro-DRM if they want the content. The people against the DRM are the users, and the player creators who don't license content. In other words, the people over whom the content producers have no leverage. 
66 comments on original post
Add a comment...

Jeffrey Mudge

Shared publicly  - 
Add a comment...

Jeffrey Mudge

Shared publicly  - 
This animation of how Space X wants their Falcon Heavy rockets to work, eventually returning to the launchpad is pretty cool.  
Add a comment...

Jeffrey Mudge

Shared publicly  - 
Shawn Denny's profile photo
Loved it!
Add a comment...

Jeffrey Mudge

Shared publicly  - 
Leaving Landon off was a bit of a shock despite the hints from both sides, but I'm still excited to see what happens.  
Klinsmann didn't wait around.  Tickets. Are. Booked. 
Jurgen Klinsmann didn't wait around until June 2. On Thursday the US national team manager announced his final 23-man roster for the 2014 World Cup, well ahead of the FIFA deadline, and it does no
12 comments on original post
Add a comment...
I like to figure things out and make them work and explain them to other people. 
  • Indiana University
    MS Information Science, 2010 - 2012
  • MS Library Science, 2010 - 2012
  • Taylor University
    BA History, 2005 - 2009
  • BA International Studies:Middle East, 2005 - 2009
Contributor to
Library Technology
Basic Information
Jeffrey Mudge's +1's are the things they like, agree with, or want to recommend.
Seattle Sounders' Obafemi Martins adds to wondergoal reputation with swe...

Obafemi Martins has shown a tendency to score memorable, high-quality goals since his arrival in Major League Soccer, and he added to that r

MLS Insider: Beards, tattoos and the art of defending the Timbers Army

Photo by USA Today Sports Nat Borchers and Liam Ridgewell come from different backgrounds, but they seem to share more than just a position

Inbox by Gmail

Inbox by Gmail requires an invite. Email to request one. Your email inbox should help you live and work better, but instead


Netflix is the world’s leading subscription service for watching TV episodes and movies on your phone. This Netflix mobile application deliv

MLS Matchday is ready for Chromecast

If you can't get enough soccer on TV this summer, you'll love MLS LIVE with Chromecast. MLS Matchday, the league's official app for Android

World Cup: USMNT Google+ Hangouts | Wednesday: Kyle Beckerman & DeAn...

US Soccer and Major League Soccer are hosting a series of Google+ Hangouts this week with MLS players currently at the US national team's pr

Powering up: Valve's Steam Machine sent to testers in a wooden crate

Valve’s prototype Steam Machine gaming consoles are making their way to beta testers, and just like everything the gaming company does, it’s


Working? Relaxing? At the gym? Songza plays you the right music at the right time. * Named "Editors' Choice" by Google Play. * Free, with no

Motorola Active Display

Knowledge is power, and Active Display gives you just that - at a glance. It always displays what you need to know, when you need to know it

Government requests for user information double over three years

Over the past three years, we've continued to add more details to the report, and we're doing so again today. We're including additional inf

Evangelicals and the World Abroad

Dear friends, brothers and sisters in Christ, Bear with me as I relay three personal stories from the last month that have been weighing on


Explore new places, discover local favorites, and navigate your world with Google Maps. Available on Android phones and tablets with a simpl

Motorola Spotlight Player™

We love stories. We love technology. So we put our engineers together with award-winning directors and together made a new storytelling canv

Where Are You From?

Fun Fact. If you flipped Mount Everest over and placed it on top of the Mariana Trench, it’s peak would fall 7,000 feet short of the bottom.

xkcd: Tall Infographics

< Prev · Random; Next >; >|. Permanent link to this comic: Image URL (for hotlinking/embedding):

Google Play Books

Choose from millions of titles on Google Play including new releases, New York Times best sellers, up-and-coming authors, and free books. Ea


There are many lessons available for learning quite frequently in my life it seems. Now, whether I have the patience, the will, the keen eye

Securing your WiFi network

This post is part of a regular series of privacy and security tips to help you and your family stay safe and secure online. Privacy and secu

Preliminary Thoughts on Egypt's Coup/Revolution/Crazytime

Wait. What Just Happened? Here's how I see it, based on what I've read and conversations with Egyptian people somewhat in-the-know. In Janua

I visited from out of town and stumbled on this little place and I'm really glad I did. It's family owned and the whole family was very friendly and the service was great. They were super with all of their customers while I was in. The food was very tasty and seemed pretty authentic to me. Be sure to ask if they have the Mango Sticky Rice dessert available. It was amazing! If I lived here it would be a favorite regular place.
Public - 9 months ago
reviewed 9 months ago
Nice set of trails on a little island accessible by causeway. Very pleasant.
Public - a year ago
reviewed a year ago
I had a great time. They had a good mix of food, both American and Mediterranean. I have tried both the falafel and the gyro and was pleased with both. The restaurant is a tad dark, but it was a pleasant atmosphere and the service was great.
Food: ExcellentDecor: Very GoodService: Excellent
Public - 2 years ago
reviewed 2 years ago
Food: ExcellentDecor: GoodService: Excellent
Public - 2 years ago
reviewed 2 years ago
20 reviews
The food was tasty and the service very good too.
Food: Very GoodDecor: Very GoodService: Very Good
Public - a year ago
reviewed a year ago
Food: ExcellentDecor: ExcellentService: Excellent
Public - 2 years ago
reviewed 2 years ago
The food was pretty good. The chicken was a little dried out, but everything else was delicious and the service was fine. I can't say how authentic it was, and there were definitely generic oriental foods in addition to the Tibetan food. The music was a tad out of place - jazz just didn't seem to fit.
Public - 3 years ago
reviewed 3 years ago