Cover photo
Verified name
Jeff Jarvis
Works at CUNY Graduate School of Journalism
Lives in New Jersey


I've been looking forward to this...
One of my Favorite shows!  Second season starts on BBC America tonight.  You can get Season 1 on Google Play.  (
Ralf Haring's profile photoSibyll Hampton's profile photoWerner Habel's profile photoemre comert's profile photo
+Adrian Robinson I agree with you on seasons 1&2 of Continuum. But the present season's time travel plot is getting too complex. I still watch for now. 
Add a comment...

Jeff Jarvis

Shared publicly  - 
I do believe that's the head of Axel Springer, Mathias Döpfner, leading the band on the publishing Titanic after it hits iceberg Google. With him is Bild editor in chief +Kai Diekmann.
Wozu groß bloggen, wenn man die Medienwoche doch auch in einer kleinen Zeichnung zusammenfassen kann? ;-)

 ·  Translate
Susan Robertson's profile photoŞÜKRÜ DAĞ's profile photoJohn Blossom's profile photoRichard Gutjahr's profile photo
+John Blossom have you read the piece? I have. While some of the pronouncements were a bit over the top/whiny, there were also real valid issues raised, that Google will try to gloss over at their peril.
Add a comment...

Jeff Jarvis

Shared publicly  - 
Does Biden have a Samsung deal?
furd burfle's profile photoDan Gold's profile photoGiovanni Panaro's profile photoDennis D. McDonald's profile photo
Yeah Shane it's a real pity they enjoy life.
Add a comment...

Jeff Jarvis

Shared publicly  - 
You will never find a finer example of a certain German business model popular in the internet age than in an open letter to Google’s Eric Schmidt written by Mathias Döpfner, head of the conservative German publishing giant Axel Springer. (English translation courtesy of the all-seeing, all-powerful Google at a link below.)

The essence of that business model, as practiced especially by German and sometimes French legacy publishers, is to stomp their feet like pouty kindergartners missing a turn at kickball, whining “that’s not fair” and yelling that everything wrong on this playground is the fault of another kid, then running to hide behind the skirt of the teacher. That is what Döpfner does here, demonizing Google (and Mark Zuckerberg while he’s at it) for numerous perceived sins I’ll explore below and — here’s the real agenda — demanding that the European Commission rescue the dinosaurs (his word) with regulation.

What a humiliating moment it must be for a powerful businessman to admit that he cannot compete in the marketplace. The entire letter struck me as an act of economic self-castration. It must also hurt for the head of a bastion of political conservatism in Germany — the publisher of the newspaper Bild, a Fox-News-with-boobs, and the leader of the company that constructed its headquarters ass-on the Berlin Wall just to extend a middle finger to the communists across it — to now beg government (the EU at that) for regulation. You’d think Döpfner lived in San Francisco and was a dancer in clown suit blocking Google buses. This is a call for big-government interference in the market we wouldn’t see even from the Guardian or The New York Times.

There’s history here. Döpfner and Springer led a fight by German publishers to stop Google from, in their view, stealing snippets of their articles on Google News — even though, as Eric Schmidt likes to point out, Google sends 10 billion vists to publishers every month. Here, too, the big boys of publishing ran to hide behind the skirts of government, getting a law called the Leistungschutzrecht passed. That seemed like victory until all the publishers went ahead and allowed Google to quote and link to them because, to paraphrase Woody Allen, they needed the eggs. Insert pouty foot-stomping here.

In the meantime, the antitrust forces of the European Commission investigated Google and negotiated an agreement. But this doesn’t go far enough for Döpfner. And, besides, a defanged, pacified, regulated, cooperative Google is no fun if you want to kick up dust on the playground and blame someone else for all your woes. Young Döpfner needs Google to be a big, bad bully.

So in his letter, Döpfner pulls out every last stop to demonize Google. He compares Google with the Mafia, complaining that the EC’s agreement with Google — stipulating the ability of competitors to buy ads on Google — smacks of “protection money.” (Would Springer’s Bild take ads from its competitors?) But that’s nothing. Döpfner says Mark Zuckerberg views on privacy could come from the head of the Stasi (I find this trivialization of an evil regime offensive); he says Google “sits on the entire privacy of mankind like the giant Fafner in the Ring of the Nibelung;” and then, giving up is last shred of subtlety, invokes Orwell. “Forget Big Brother,” Döpfner squeals, “Google is better!”

Döpfner complains about Google’s search-engine market share, not mentioning that German users — last I knew — gave Google its second-highest penetration in the world, and he also makes its success in creating great services in video, email, and mobile sound ominous. He complains about Google’s self-driving cars competing with Volkswagen and about Google buying Nest and entering our homes. 

But Döpfner goes much farther in his effort to portray Google as a dark specter overtaking Europe when he frets about Google buying drone companies and allegedly planning huge ships and floating offices operating in stateless waters and wonders whether it will create a superstate floating free of laws. “One needn’t be a conspiracy theorist,” he says, “to find this disturbing.”

Then Döpfner makes a series of recommendations that I am confident he knows are absurd, for I know Döpfner and he is as very smart man. He asks that Google reveal the quantitative criteria behinds its search algorithm, though, of course, that would only enable every spammer on earth to game Google, making it worthless as as service. He asks Google to not store IP addresses and to delete cookies after every session, making targeted advertising impossible and also making Google and its advertising business worthless. He complains about Google and other companies — singling out Jawbone — collecting and using behavioral data to support free services, concluding that “it is better and cheaper to pay with something old-fashioned: simply with money.”

Aha. That is — or was — Springer’s business model until it failed at newspapers and sold most of them, except Bild and its ever-struggling Welt — buying digital enterprises to replace them. Döpfner would like to force the world into his model: People used to buy our content with money so they must continue. To invent new models, well, that’s just not fair, is it? Anything else should be stomped out by government protecting the incumbents. There’s his real agenda.

I find this more tragic than comic. Just as Germany is moving past its reputation for being skittish with entrepreneurial risk and failure, just as it is giving up its bad habit of copycatting American internet startups rather than inventing their own, and just as Berlin’s start-up scene — very near Springer’s headquarters in what used to be the East — is coming into its own as a real creative, technical, and entrepreneurial powerhouse, here comes a titan of old industry making his nation appear technophobic, uncompetitive, and even slightly anticapitalistic.

I don’t think Döpfner believes most of what he wrote, just as Springer and its fellow travelers really didn’t believe in their Leistungschutzrecht. I heard publishers there say that they pushed for the law just so they could strengthen their negotiating position with Google. Too bad for them it didn’t work. So now Döpfner continues to play, thinking that by bullying Google in the press and with government, he can get a pity turn at kickball. But he should beware the unintended consequences of his game, affecting the reputation of Germany as a source of technological and industrial innovation and inviting greater government regulation and interference in markets.

I am surprised you fear Google, Mathias. I thought you were stronger than that.

[Disclosures: Axel Springer flew me a few years ago to speak at its managers' retreat in Tuscany and I've also been engaged to speak at its headquarters. Google is flying me to its headquarters -- with no other fee -- in two weeks to speak to its privacy group. I own Google stock. I have always found Döpfner and the editor of Bild, Kai Diekmann, to be charming and smart and I've said much of what I just said here to them over wine.]

Google translation of Döpfner's open letter:
16.04.2014  ·  Zum ersten Mal bekennt hier ein deutscher Manager die totale Abhängigkeit seines Unternehmens von Google. Was heute die Verlage erleben, ist ein Vorbote: Bald gehören wir alle Google. Ein Offener Brief an Eric Schmidt.
Jochen Fromm's profile photoHartmut Noack's profile photoJürgen Christoffel's profile photoAlexander Skwar's profile photo
Add a comment...

Jeff Jarvis

Shared publicly  - 
Soon to be a regular set on CNN. 
Want to fly an Emirates A380? Take the pilot’s seat at the Emirates A380 Experience, now open at the Dubai Mall.
Emirates A380 Experience | Dubai | Emirates #emiratesairline   #airbusa380   #dubai   #aviation  
Vincent Martinez's profile photoJohn Mayson's profile photoMilton P.'s profile photocalvin boston's profile photo
Maybe Airbus 380 will fare better than M370 (Boeing 777).
Add a comment...
In his circles
1,468 people

Jeff Jarvis

Shared publicly  - 

Alt text: I can't remember where I heard this, but someone once said that defending a position by citing free speech is sort of the ultimate concession; you're saying that the most compelling thing you can say for your position is that it's not literally illegal to express.
John Chase's profile photoOlle Gladso's profile photoMatt Smith's profile photoTim Owens's profile photo
Add a comment...
+Omer Tene  and +Jules Polonetsky  wrote a theory of creepy. Here is what I had to say about the word "creepy" in my book Public Parts

The worst definition of privacy, the one I also hear quite often at privacy conferences and in conversations, is contained in one word: “creepy.” Internet applications or ad tracking or RFID chips are called creepy. Google puts its Street View camera on a bike to take it to places cars can’t go, and that’s creepy.24 Almost every discussion of facial recognition software ends with “creepy.”25 In one of his all-too-quotable quotes, Google’s Eric Schmidt says the company’s “policy on a lot of things is to get right up to the creepy line and not cross it.”26 That itself was called creepy. When I hear “creepy,” I’ve taken to stopping the conversation and asking the person who uses it to define the word, the context, and the harm. Shrugs ensue. “I don’t know. I just don’t like it. It’s . . . ​it’s creepy.” It is an emotional response to the unknown, to what could happen. Though we’ve seen that privacy is often about feelings and fears, emotion alone is not the proper basis for regulation of new technologies and industries and speech.
If businesses knew what "creepy" was, they would surely steer clear of privacy snafus and consumer backlash.
Adam Burtt's profile photoJochen Fromm's profile photoDon Marti's profile photoTyler Larson's profile photo
Matt S
+Alex Schleber good point. Sums up the other side of what I should have said. 
Add a comment...

Jeff Jarvis

Shared publicly  - 
This is the mobile cell-phone holder I mentioned on This Week in Google today: 
Tom Wisniewski's profile photoJim Tupper's profile photoJoe Nicholson's profile photoJon Paul's profile photo
Even with the clip on the louvers? I have 5 vehicles, all use the exterior louvers to shut off airflow, they would not close with this mounted to the louvers. What model car do you have +Jim Tupper I'm just curious.
Add a comment...
Very long, very well-researched explainer on the SF real-estate/tech/capitalism wars. 
The Santa Clara Valley was some of the most valuable agricultural land in the entire world, but it was paved over to create today's Silicon Valley. This was..
Donald Lee's profile photoPhilip Salgannik's profile photoMatt Barger's profile photoEdouard E's profile photo
Thank you +Kim-Mai Cutler and thanks to +Jeff Jarvis for posting a link to this article. 
I thought I didn't like long form articles like this, I was wrong, I just never read anything this well done with so many great links to the background behind the story. I'm going to look for more on this topic and everything by Kim-Mai Cutler. Well done!
Add a comment...

Jeff Jarvis

Shared publicly  - 
Glass is the loom of the 21st century Luddite. 

I think it's ridiculous that this journalist gets assaulted and his $1,500 property stolen and destroyed and then -- too PC for me -- works hard to "understand." 

This is going too far, San Francisco. 
Ian McCully's profile photoAaron Hudson's profile photoRafael Pérez's profile photoSpock Brother's profile photo
THAK Google bills in mail  lol
Add a comment...
In his circles
1,468 people
Journalism professor, blogger, writer
  • CUNY Graduate School of Journalism
    Journalism professor, blogger, writer, present
  • Advance Publications
  • New York Daily News
  • TV Guide
  • Entertainment Weekly
  • People magazine
  • San Francisco Examiner
  • Chicago Tribune
  • Chicago Today
Basic Information
Author of "Public Parts: How Sharing in the Digital Age Improves the Way We Work and Live" and "What Would Google Do?" Director of the Tow-Knight Center for Entrepreneurial Journalism at the City University of New York Graduate School of Journalism. Blogs at and writes for the Guardian. Formerly creator and founding editor of Entertainment Weekly; president and creative director of; Sunday editor and associate publisher of the NY Daily News; columnist on the San Francisco Examiner. 
Map of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has lived
New Jersey
Chicago - San Francisco - Cinnaminson, NJ - New York - Claremont, CA - Burlington, IA - Evanston, IL - Elmhurst, IL - Lombard, IL