Profile

Cover photo
Jan de Haan
Works at IT
Attended Windesheim Honours College
Lives in Op den Haar, Deventer, The Netherlands
47 followers|181,139 views
AboutPostsPhotosVideosReviews

Stream

Jan de Haan

General Discussion  - 
 
Good find and question about Google Earth and Linux.
 
What's the deal with Google Earth and Fedora 21? My honest suspicion is that they are trending towards a primarily "web only" product with less functionality as with the desktop installations. I have noted that some versions of GE will achieve "End of Life" status as of 31 Dec 2015. GE Pro is available for free now also. With the lack of an updated version for the latest Linux flavors, this would clearly indicate a vacum in the Linux mapping venue. 
2 comments on original post
2
1
Davíð Þórisson's profile photoSean Campbell ن‎'s profile photo
 
Really... don't worry. HTML technology is already on par with desktop, take WebGL as an example (try Googlin'  "WebGL demos"). There are very few things HTML cannot to today which desktop can.
Add a comment...

Jan de Haan changed his profile photo.

Shared publicly  - 
1
Add a comment...

Jan de Haan

Training/Tutorials/HOWTO  - 
 
Good theory, perfect layout and interesting subject.
4
Add a comment...

Jan de Haan

Shared publicly  - 
 
Even if you like rock only a little, this is beautifull!
1
Add a comment...

Jan de Haan

General Discussion  - 
 
Long, but worth the read.
 
About That "Last Mile" Thing...
 
Not too long ago, a blogger on a somewhat popular tech blog posted a pretty scathing post here on G+ about how people complaining that Comcast demanding payment on that last mile were stupid and didn't know what they were talking about and other things that aren't worth going back to quote directly. He posted a blog piece by someone who pointed out that, indeed, Netflix and ISPs already have been paying in a mutually beneficial manner to maintain an interconnect network that allows for everyone to have some advantage (in economic terms, a win/win/win situation). Based on this incomplete information, said blogger decided to lambast people who complained, presumably because now said blogger Knew A Thing Or Two About This Sort Of Thing™.
 
I humbly submit the words of Ken Florance, VP of content delivery at +Netflix:  http://blog.netflix.com/2014/04/the-case-against-isp-tolls.html 
 
Comcast does not carry Netflix traffic over long distances. Netflix is itself shouldering the costs and performing the transport function for which it used to pay transit providers. Netflix connects to Comcast in locations all over the U.S., and has offered to connect in as many locations as Comcast desires. So Netflix is moving Netflix content long distances, not Comcast.
 
Nor does Comcast connect Netflix to other networks. In fact, Netflix can’t reach other networks via Comcast’s network.

For all these reasons, Netflix directly interconnects with many ISPs here in the U.S. and internationally without any exchange of fees.
 
In sum, Comcast is not charging Netflix for transit service. It is charging Netflix for access to its subscribers. Comcast also charges its subscribers for access to Internet content providers like Netflix. In this way, Comcast is double dipping by getting both its subscribers and Internet content providers to pay for access to each other.
 
It is true that there is competition among the transit providers and CDNs that transport and localize data across networks. But even the most competitive transit market cannot ensure sufficient access to the Comcast network. That’s because, to reach consumers, CDNs and transit providers must ultimately hand the traffic over to a terminating ISP like Comcast, which faces no competition. Put simply, there is one and only one way to reach Comcast’s subscribers at the last mile: Comcast.
 
There cannot be an “intensely competitive” market when Comcast alone sets the terms and conditions for access to Comcast subscribers. Comcast can simply refuse to provide capacity to any network at any time, constraining the ability for Comcast users to use the services they want. Comcast’s ability to constrain access to Netflix can be clearly seen in the following chart, which shows how Netflix performance deteriorated on the Comcast network and then immediately recovered after Netflix started paying Comcast in February.
 
I bolded the important parts in case the description was too long and technical. Basically, Comcast is charging twice for the same service. Comcast is essentially double dipping in order to provide a "fast lane" that is really just "the lane Netflix is providing" in less than technical terms. Said blogger mentioned earlier claimed that this had nothing to do with Net Neutrality. Clearly, said blogger doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground. Well, unless his definition of Net Neutrality completely ignores the whole "pay extra for a fast lane" part of it, which is the most important part for consumers in the first place.
 
Look at the image I'm sharing. The green is the base infrastructure that Netflix pays for to handle their massive throughput on a daily basis. Notice how Charter and AT&T (and tons of other providers) have interconnected points of connection to provide their subscribers access to that infrastructure. Notice how Comcast doesn't. That, right there, is the problem and is the danger that people were and are pissed about. That's not conspiracy theory or bullshit or lack of understanding. That's Comcast being total assholes and taking two payments for one service. Imagine if Comcast decided to start forcing Amazon to pay so that people accessing their online store could do so without everything being at a crawl. That's exactly what Comcast did to Netflix
 
So maybe said blogger should stick to telling us which app is worth downloading or which new phone is nicer than the other new phone, and stop pretending they understand how content delivery networks operate and interact with Internet service providers.
 
[EDIT to add] To provide more detail, here is the article that was linked originally: http://blog.streamingmedia.com/2014/03/netflix-level-3-telling-half-story-wont-detail-changes-want-net-neutrality.html
 
The person in that link asked: " So why did Netflix continue to push their traffic through Cogent even though they knew the link was congested?"
 
The answer is that Netflix had no choice. Comcast controls the portal to their last mile. No sharing available, at the behest of the ISP. Besides, Netflix doesn't "win" either way in this situation, and they don't "lose" either. A company the size of Netflix is going to get theirs regardless. The people who wind up paying (and losing) are the consumers/subscribers. Comcast double dips because their business model of being the sole portal through which paying customers get access to the Internet is based on 20th century infrastructure planning. The biggest cell phone companies often suffer the same fault with their cellular networks. So while the original article that the blogger linked raised a question that deserved an answer, the conclusions that came from the unanswered question (and the blogger's faulty assertion that it had nothing to do with Net Neutrality, which we now know is false [ http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/24/technology/fcc-new-net-neutrality-rules.html ]) were just the kind of distraction from reality that Comcast would like. In fact, Comcast liked that question without an answer so much they used it as their response to Netflix's criticism of their Time Warner merger ( http://corporate.comcast.com/comcast-voices/comcast-response-to-netflix ). Since Netflix has supplied the answer to the question, an answer that still makes Comcast look bad, this is now all about ISPs marketing to you and me that they're the good guys and big, bad companies like Netflix (and Amazon Video, and YouTube, and Vimeo, and so on) are the bad guys who are hurting people.
 
[Image credit blog.netflix.com ]
99 comments on original post
43
13
Lukas Zilka's profile photoRyan Robidou's profile photoMike Berggren's profile photoArnaud Gelly's profile photo
12 comments
 
This makes me glad that I live in a country with net neutrality legislation. Let's see how quickly the rest of the EU will follow. The European Parliament has made the first steps.
Add a comment...

Jan de Haan

Help Needed  - 
 
Hi All, my ISP is upgrading me to 180Mbit down/18Mbit up, so it's about time I replace my Soekris 4801 (running Linux of course). Any recommendations to profit fully from this and future upgrades for the foreseeing years? [Edit: sorry, mistakenly reversed up and down]
1
Eric Gartner's profile photoJohan Heikkilä's profile photoJan de Haan's profile photoPeter Gamache's profile photo
9 comments
 
Yes, that's essentially it. The firewall has inside+outside interfaces and a host-only DMZ interface that it uses to communicate with other VMs. The real key is to resist the temptation to load all sorts of services onto the host system. My host OS is a LTS version of Ubuntu Server, but there are plenty of choices. I picked it because it's stable and doesn't need a lot of patching. I have VirtualBox installed along with some custom scripts for juggling the states of running/suspended/starting VMs.
Add a comment...
In his circles
177 people
Have him in circles
47 people
Robert Schutter's profile photo
Bart Bockhoudt's profile photo
Don Crowder's profile photo
Shannon Collier's profile photo
Katerine Nagato's profile photo
Richard Arends's profile photo
Kirk Pearson (TronaTux)'s profile photo
Hans Keupink's profile photo
Healthy-ojas.com's profile photo

Communities

14 communities

Jan de Haan

Posts to remove  - 
168
150
Valis Valis's profile photoDana Lee Gibson's profile photoMarc Zimmermann's profile photoJohnny M. Rodriguez R's profile photo
41 comments
 
its a chain letter. who cares what it says. posts like it belong in the garbage, teach them this. 
Add a comment...
 
Time to start digging. ..
 
Official CoreOS images are now available on Google Compute Engine. Learn more about how to use CoreOS on the blog and in the accompanying documentation here: http://goo.gl/A86KzX
6 comments on original post
9
1
Roman Mednitzer's profile photo
Add a comment...
 
Open hardware hits back!
 
In various talks about the FreedomBox project, I've mentioned my excitement about the Novena platform... a fully open design laptop project.  I have one of the current prototype circuit boards, and it's a very cool piece of hardware...  If you want one too, you need to act quickly, as the campaign over on Crowd Supply ends soon!
A new open-hardware computing platform, flexible and powerful, designed for use as a desktop, laptop, or standalone board.
8 comments on original post
2
Add a comment...
 
Linus Torvalds seems to be very upset with a famous developer who had the wrong attitude towards the users and the Linux kernel developers. Everythin...
View original post
35
7
Sancho Virág Attila's profile photoHolland Griffis's profile photoSergei Petrov's profile photoJúlio Gomes Fonseca's profile photo
5 comments
 
All code? Exaggerated, it was 2 lines only, 2 dirty lines 
Add a comment...
 
Got mine almost a year ago. Was a good bet, clearly. Public 2 factor authentication. Good stuff! They have the wind in their sails, every way you look at it.
 
We had a wonderful meeting with PC Magazine yesterday at RSA!  Read the article below!  

RSAC: Yubico and the FIDO Alliance Promise an End to Passwords
Passwords are a terrible authentication solution, and biometric solutions require complicated hardware. The coming Yubikey Neo, powered by FIDO universal two factor authentication, just might spell the end of passwords.
1 comment on original post
3
1
Paul Hunnisett's profile photoJan de Haan's profile photoEric Keller's profile photo
2 comments
 
+Paul Hunnisett Buy! ;-) 
Add a comment...
People
In his circles
177 people
Have him in circles
47 people
Robert Schutter's profile photo
Bart Bockhoudt's profile photo
Don Crowder's profile photo
Shannon Collier's profile photo
Katerine Nagato's profile photo
Richard Arends's profile photo
Kirk Pearson (TronaTux)'s profile photo
Hans Keupink's profile photo
Healthy-ojas.com's profile photo
Communities
14 communities
Education
  • Windesheim Honours College
    Informatica, 2007 - 2009
  • IHBO Eindhoven
    Informatica, 1983 - 1986
Basic Information
Gender
Male
Relationship
In a relationship
Story
Tagline
The price of reliability is simplicity, and for many engineers that is too high a price to pay. Anonymous
Introduction
Nerd, proud single dad
Bragging rights
fallen out of an airplane 1800+ times
Work
Occupation
Linux system and software engineer
Skills
Linux, virtualization, programming, networking
Employment
  • IT
    System and software engineer Linux, present
    self-employed
Places
Map of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has lived
Currently
Op den Haar, Deventer, The Netherlands
Links
Other profiles
Contributor to
Public - 7 months ago
reviewed 7 months ago
1 review
Map
Map
Map