Profile

Henry Reich
Works at MinuteEarth
Attended Grinnell College
188,324 have them in circles

Stream

Henry Reich

Shared publicly  -

How do Modern Light Bulbs Work? NEW VIDEO!﻿
462
107

great way to explain free electrons and holes of PN junction in LED.﻿

Henry Reich

Shared publicly  -

Excellent

There is a lot of discussion in various online mathematical forums currently about the interpretation, derivation, and significance of Ramanujan's famous (but extremely unintuitive) formula

1+2+3+4+... = -1/12   (1)

or similar divergent series formulae such as

1-1+1-1+... = 1/2 (2)

or

1+2+4+8+... = -1. (3)

One can view this topic from either a pre-rigorous, rigorous, or post-rigorous perspective (see this page of mine for a description of these three terms: http://terrytao.wordpress.com/career-advice/there%E2%80%99s-more-to-mathematics-than-rigour-and-proofs/  ).  The pre-rigorous approach is not particularly satisfactory: here one is taught the basic rules for manipulating finite sums (e.g. how to add or subtract one finite sum from another), and one is permitted to blindly apply these rules to infinite sums.  This approach can give derivations of identities such as (1), but can also lead to derivations of even more blatant absurdities such as 0=1, which of course makes any similar derivation of (1) look quite suspicious.

From a rigorous perspective, one learns in undergraduate analysis classes the notion of a convergent series and a divergent series, with the former having a well defined limit, which enjoys most of the same laws of series that finite series do (particularly if one restricts attention to absolutely convergent series).  In more advanced courses, one can then learn of more exotic summation methods (e.g. Cesaro summation, p-adic summation or Ramanujan summation) which can sometimes (but not always) be applied to certain divergent series, and which obey some (but not all) of the rules that finite series or absolutely convergent series do.  One can then carefully derive, manipulate, and use identities such as (1), so long as it is made precise at any given time what notion of summation is in force.  For instance, (1) is not true if summation is interpreted in the classical sense of convergent series, but it is true for some other notions of summation, such as Ramanujan summation, or a real-variable analogue of that summation that I describe in this post: http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2010/04/10/the-euler-maclaurin-formula-bernoulli-numbers-the-zeta-function-and-real-variable-analytic-continuation/#comment-265849

From a post-rigorous perspective, I believe that an equation such as (1) should more accurately be rendered as

1+2+3+4+... = -1/12 + ...

where the "..." on the right-hand side denotes terms which could be infinitely large (or divergent) when interpreted classically, but which one wishes to view as "negligible" for one's intended application (or at least "orthogonal" to that application).  For instance, as a rough first approximation (and assuming implicitly that the summation index in these series starts from n=1 rather than n=0), (1), (2), (3) should actually be written as

1+2+3+4+... = -1/12  + 1/2 infinity^2   (1)'

1-1+1-1+... = 1/2 - (-1)^{infinity} /2 (2)'

or

1+2+4+8+... = -1 + 2^{infinity}  (3)'

and more generally

1+x+x^2+x^3+... = 1/(1-x) + x^{infinity}/(x-1)

where the terms involving infinity do not make particularly rigorous sense, but would be considered orthogonal to the application at hand (a physicist would call these quantities unphysical) and so can often be neglected in one's manipulations.  (If one wanted to be even more accurate here, the 1/2 infinity^2 term should really be the integral of x dx from 0 to infinity.)  To rigorously formalise the notion of ignoring certain types of infinite expressions, one needs to use one of the summation methods mentioned above (with different summation methods corresponding to different classes of infinite terms that one is permitted to delete); but the above post-rigorous formulae can still provide clarifying intuition, once one has understood their rigorous counterparts.  For instance, the formulae (1)' and (3)' are now consistent with the left-hand side being positive and diverging to infinity, and the formula (2)' is consistent with the left-hand side being indeterminate in limit, with both 0 and 1 as limit points.  The fact that divergent series often do not behave well with respect to shifting the series can now be traced back to the fact that the infinite terms in the above identities produce some finite remainders when the infinity in those terms is shifted, say to infinity+1.

For a more advanced example, I believe that the "field of one element" should really be called "the field of 1+... elements", where the ... denotes an expression which one believes to be orthogonal to one's application.﻿
45
11
Nick G

Blah.....﻿

Henry Reich

Shared publicly  -

Why is the Solar System Flat? NEW VIDEO!﻿
259
62

is  g+ page abandoned?﻿

Henry Reich

Shared publicly  -

Why Winter has the Best Full Moons﻿
217
30

ha! Yes, I am that one. ﻿

Henry Reich

Shared publicly  -

NEW VIDEO! Three Simple Ways to Time Travel

(with help from  )﻿
248
62

must be a wormhole man. happens all the time with me too﻿
Have them in circles
188,324 people

Henry Reich

Shared publicly  -

Are any Animals Truly Monogamous? NEW VIDEO﻿
155
28

Interesting video. I think monogamy is a word invented for the human species for practical purposes since human babies need to be cared for and nurtured. Also that we invented the concept of home, nation and country that has to be sustained by taxes. Most importantly, sexually transmitted diseases. The Old Testament has stories showing humans were not monogamous on the part of the male and was the accepted practice at the time. Without the order monogamy, there would be no cheating. Good or bad the order has been established.﻿

Henry Reich

Shared publicly  -

Evolution vs Natural Selection: NEW VIDEO﻿
143
25

That is what happened!﻿

Henry Reich

Shared publicly  -

What should you do when it's really really cold outside? Go swimming, for one...﻿
271
71

cool!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!﻿

Henry Reich

Shared publicly  -

When we say Mt. Everest is 8850m tall, how do we know what sea level would be beneath the mountain? NEW VIDEO!﻿
246
71

There is another simple way to measure that without too much calculation measuring the atmospheric pressure, because just like the water, the air also has gravitational influence from surrounding matter, and it's easier to find air nearby...﻿

Henry Reich

Shared publicly  -

Which Came First - the Rain or the Rainforest? NEW VIDEO﻿
195
45

Thanks. Awesome video I can understand now ﻿
People
Have them in circles
188,324 people
Work
Occupation
Employment
• MinuteEarth
Creator, 2013 - present
• MinutePhysics
• Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
Digital Media Artist, 2012 - 2013
vfx & other stuff, 2011 - 2011
Basic Information
Other names
Minute physics, Minutephysics
Story
Tagline
Minutephysics: cool physics and other sweet science. On Youtube.
Introduction
I'm constantly in awe at the world. Isn't it spectacular? I like physics (and science in general) because the rules of physics, chemistry and biology apply regardless of opinion polls of scientists or the public. The goal of science is to find out how the world (universe, nature, etc) works by careful observation. It doesn't matter at all if you believe in a theory or not - what matters is whether nature works that way. A lot of popular ideas (for example, "the earth is flat") turned out to be wrong, and a lot of uncomfortable ideas (like quantum mechanics and plate tectonics) turned out to be right. It's a dictatorship – nature decides how nature works, and you get no vote! But you get to decide which questions to ask - and that's what makes science fun.
Bragging rights
1st graduating class of PSI @perimeterinstitute!
Education
• Grinnell College
Physics and Mathematics, 2005 - 2009
• Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
Physics, 2009 - 2010
• University of Southern California
Film Production, 2011 - 2011