Shared publicly  - 
 
Seriously, I'm not quick to get on this bandwagon. I believe it will take off, but I don't believe in premature marketing decisions for nonprofits. Sorry, +John Haydon ;)
3
Marc van Gurp's profile photoBeth Kanter's profile photoSteven Streight's profile photoGeoff Livingston's profile photo
13 comments
 
Agree with you on being slow to G+ with regard to marketing, but I would have to think for your clients that the collaboration possibilities of G+ are better than most public platforms.
 
I'm not either - just finishing a post ..
 
I think we've entered warp speed when it comes to clamoring to give advice on things that are just too new and unproven to make authoritative recommendations. In the "old days," we had to wait and see over time and then...we'd write a book which would come out in a year and still be relevant when it did. ;) Right now, we should be in introduction mode and explaining the very basics rather than leaping into the deep end before we've learned to put our faces in the water, much less swim.
 
I thought we weren't supposed to do any marketing on G+ until the Brand Pages arrive.
 
Seems to be reasonable advice, especially about the limits for fundraising in the short-run. But it does seem like presence here early makes sense for nonprofits such as ours (http://socialcapitalinc.org) where tech features prominently in the work. More to connect and engage with interested folks, not fundraising per se.
 
Not yet. Why did it take 20 years to drag brands into social media, now all of a sudden they're ready to hop on every new thing. As the Fresh Prince would rap "brands just don't understand".
 
The key question you ask is 'will I go where my audience is' or 'will I build an audience on a spot of my choice'.
 
+Bill Johnston While most of Zoetica's clients get social and are actually on Google+ as individuals, most of their volunteers, donors and stakeholders are not on yet. A vast majority, in fact. That's the issue.
 
I don't think it's an issue that your audience is not on G+ yet. You can still start developing a presence of value on a social media site to prepare it for when your audience does get on. There is also the tremendous power of SEO with anything Google.
 
+Bruce Bates +Steven Streight Please explain to me how someone is supposed to ask their friends for money if they aren't on Google+? Social fundraising's #1 reason to give according to the Millennial Donors research is an ask by a friend. Don't mistake a long tail view of months and years for a fundraiser which takes place in a week or two.
 
+Geoff Livingston +Bruce Bates has a good point about Circles clicking on Share and +1 for a fundraising org. Why can't a fundraiser use G+ to tell a story about the organization, provide value to the community, answer questions, etc.? Plus, the SEO power of being on G+ is, from all reports I see, tremendous. This is a very real benefit of a G+ presence for any organization or individual.
 
+Bruce Bates I'm not convinced. I did a fundraiser last week, and I am an early adopter, and I can tell you even with everyone across all the networks, Twitter and email rocked it. Now imagine not having any friends on Google+. At least I got +1s. They'd get crickets.
Add a comment...