, you question it? Really? So, care to explain WHY our "dictator" in chief is acting like chicken little, claiming that the sequester (his own idea) is going to cause such a HORRIBLE tidal wave of bad things to happen when it only deals with $85Billion? Out of a budget of $2.5TRILLION, he's worried about $85Billion! And then some senior administrative official sends a veiled threat to Bob Woodward for calling the administration out on this?
Put that into perspective, folks:
The President is arguing over a cut in GROWTH, not a true cut in spending. To put it into middle class numbers, it would be the equivalent of arguing over 0.0000034% of one's income. So, if one makes $50,000.00/year, it's the same as complaining that you now have to cut back on $0.17. Yes, 17 CENTS! Honestly, who can't afford to cut back on that little?!? This is much ado about nothing.
Now, should Fox be blamed for using the term "imperial"? If you are going to critique Fox for that, then where is similar criticism for Chris Matthews claiming that ANYONE who criticized the President or made reference to "CHICAGO" as a racist?!? Seriously, are we now claiming that no one in this country other than Democrats/Liberals can separate one's political policies from one's skin color?!? PLEASE!
So...stop with the hypocritical B.S. As I said, if you want to NOT believe what Fox News puts out...that's fine. But don't claim that it's blatantly false simply because you disagree with it. BTW, I think the REAL issue here is that Fox News Channel is the most watched news channel in the U.S. (up to 2012) for the past decade: http://press.foxnews.com/2012/01/fox-news-channel-marks-decade-as-the-number-one-cable-news-network/
And while Fox News is the LEAST trusted....it is, at the same time, the MOST TRUSTED...go figure: http://www.newsmax.com/TheWire/fox-news-least-trusted-most-trusted-poll/2013/02/07/id/489328