What if: What if in the course of things, with this administrations deep connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, CAIR, and other radical Islamic factions – what if Libya was the means that (under the table) this administration used to funnel weapons to Israel’s enemies. So that on the public stage, this administration could continue to show “support” of Israel, while simultaneously arming its enemies and allowing the whole thing play out.
Why… because knowing full well that Israel would do all that it could to defend itself… But what would be the point of that? An escalated war in that region would be extremely devastating to all interest involved, so to be the white knight riding in on the horse under the “diplomatic” flag, it could justify the attempt to get all the nations on the UN security council to condemn and mobilize an international army (humanitarian “peace” force) to force Israel back to Pre-1967 borders, which I might add, has been this administration’s goal all along. Not to mention the goal of every radical Islamic group in that region. See, with a crippled Israel, they could easily initiate the radical Islamic goal of total annihilation if the Nation of Israel.
Why… beyond the initial saber-rattling hatred, Israel has discovered an abundance of oil just from Leviathan Energy and Zion Oil and Gas (not to mention all the other petrol companies). What has been discovered there would swing the balance of power in that region from those who want nothing but to destroy the “great satan, and the little satan” to our greatest ally in that region. This would greatly stand in the way of the iron rod and tyrannous oppression of sharia and all the money they could squeeze from the evil infidels.
Many might dismiss this “what if” as being “tin-foil hat” conspiracy theories with credible no basis, and try to distract with a lot of trivial and meaningless facts, “on-the-record” polices, et al to keep the official narrative on both sides of the isle alive – which is fine. I simply am throwing this out there as a discussion point in hopes that all angles of what happened in Benghazi are explored and that we are not getting too myopic in our scope, but broaden it to try to look at the bigger picture. And there definitely is a bigger picture here or the media, this administration and all those involved wouldn't try to do all they could to get the attention on anything else but the real reason.
Let’s face it an affair in DC, isn't really news – it would be more news worthy to report on those in power who were faithful in their marriage commitments (sadly that doesn't run well in the gossip mills and there wouldn't be enough ratings on those stories). Then there is the issue of 4 dead Americans on 9/11 and the cover up. This is what they want to hide because once you answer the “who knew when and why nothing done about it”, then you have to address the ultimate question….why.
I believe the ‘why’ in this is so damning both domestically and internationally, which is why at all costs they will stonewall, they will stall, they will keep throwing expendable people under the bus to keep the lie alive. They have too, because when they went public with their lame excuse, one I believe was in desperation (like a kid who got caught red-handed and is now lying to their parents to get out of it) and blind hubris, they honestly believed that they public both domestically and internationally would buy it. SO they go on apology tours on Islamic TV denouncing a “video” all in the hopes that people would think it plausible and hence let it go quietly into the good night.
That didn't happen, so they “leak” a TMZ style story of a torrid love affair with the current CIA director with juicy allegations of national security leaks, et al so that they could pin it on a man the left hated to begin with (you know… General Betray-us) hoping that the tabloid gossip mindset would either be the Band-Aid fix or detract long enough for them to launch another distraction and propaganda campaign on it. I hope my 'what-if' will keep people digging, keep people searching, keep people engaged(and not buying the ever changing narrative) so whatever the truth is will be revealed and all those involved, from the top down will not get “a pass “ out of exhausted indifference – but because of what happened there, that the congress and the people of this nation will demand that justice be served and that truth be revealed so that something like this never has the chance to happen again.
To those out there who want to rip this to shreds fine( I really could care less) all I ask is don’t start quoting the definition of ad hominem... let's not go down overused boring path of distraction and or citing rules that are only cited when people cannot use the merit of their message to stand in its own. Also I am very familiar with the rules of Alinsky so please, do us all a favor, be intellectually honest and do not try those in your response – let the flaming from the narrative keepers begin….