Bro, you're all over this post, so I guess I'll sound off to you...
1. The regulation ISN'T about "mass shootings" as you claim. How about you
look something up... What is the percentage of "mass shootings" where a tactical weapon (Assault rifle) was used to kill anyone? (I already know the answer) Now that you've looked that answer up, tell me again how banning "Assault Weapons" is supposed to do anything?
2. If banning guns actually worked DC and New York would be the safest cities in the US. Are they?
3. Let's talk about the "But you don't NEED a fillintheblank to hunt/protect yourself/target shoot. Why not ban them?" I will answer that question with another question...
Do you REALLY need
a cellphone?" Yet more people are killed every day by inattentive drivers while texting than everyone killed in "mass shootings" in a year in the US. Should we ban cellphones?
4. What about late term
abortions? Those are illegal in most states, yet there are THOUSANDS done every year. Compare that to the what?... 500 or so killed in mass shootings since 1982? A Federal ban on which of these two would "save more children?" (since that whom Obama surrounded himself with when he signed this thing.)
5. How would banning "high capacity magazines" stop anyone from getting shot? Never heard of "reloading?"
Anyone who says "you can stop them during the reload!" doesn't know anything about being shot at. (you're usually taking cover or running away... the Cops don't show up till AFTER the "mass shooting" is usually over and everyone that is going to get shot is shot.
Man, I could go on and on.. the simple fact of the matter is that the logic behind a Gun ban is flawed. Sane, Law abiding people don't commit mass murder, and a gun ban won't stop criminals or crazy folks. (but wait, if we take away the guns from normal folks, crazy people can't steal them!! Hmmm, would have stopped a crazy person from chaining the doors shut and setting the place on fire? Quick, Ban chains and lighters!!!)