Shared publicly  - 
I'm hosting the Ed Show tonight on MSNBC, 8pm ET. We'll have a lot on Libya, with Spencer Ackerman, Ben Smith, Keith Ellison, and more. We'll also have more than you might expect games.
Nour Rammal's profile photoDan Ostrowski's profile photoChristian Haye's profile photoJay Saldana's profile photo
A huge upgrade in my opinion! I'll be watching Ezra.
Hands up if you only watch the Ed Show when Ezra is hosting. :)
You should get your own show, much civilized show we can watch in Television. Wish there was a stream, I cut Directv.
i used to watch when i had a tv+cable.  now i just download the rachel maddow show.  you need a show too, ezra!
You are the Jeremy Lin of MSNBC.
I see Ezra decided to have someone update Google+ finally. :) Glad to have you back, if only temporarily. 
Great job Ezra, when are you getting your own show? :D
Excellent show I just finished washing it, I am currently in Belgium. I am so happy to see you hosting the Ed show, hopefully you will be getting your own show soon:-)
You did a magnificent job. Can't wait for you to get a shoe of your own. Keep up the great work on TV and your blog. 
We want you to have your own show Ezra.
You did a great job this week.  I look forward to seeing you regularly. Thanks.  I wish they would put you on the weekend. 
I don't understand why they show HardBall at 5pmEST and 7pmEST.  They should give him one hour, move everything up one hour and give you a show following Rachel.
Well, if we're talking "should" here, they should probably fire most of the hosts (Ed, Al, Chris) and hire Ezra and some other people who aren't mouth-breathing, partisan hacks.
MSNBC has become a viable counterpart to FOX.  There's no point in just having one-sided partisan punditry.
Even if you're going to have partisan punditry, your hosts should be above a basic intelligence threshold. (Of course, Fox violates this as well.)
OK  Now you're just resorting to name calling.  FOX - Unintelligent and dangerous.
there is a difference between lying or misrepresenting the situation and being partisan. I can respect partisan, but misrepresenting
the data is lying.  The same reason I don't read certain polls. You can "weight" for a twist in the data that gives an answer that 
is more an opinion than a reflection of truth.  Like Gallup generally researches "white upwardly mobile" as a group for their polls.   That knowledge gives you an understanding of a point of view.  Rasmussen on the other hand modifies the data by "weights" that "better represents" the conservative point of view.  So that data is a marketing tool not a serious poll.  The same is true of "Fair and Balanced".  You gotta do your homework if you want to know what is going on.
Add a comment...