And yes, I'm biased. I got a spinal cord injury myself 5 years ago, but I didn't end up in a wheel chair.
We're super excited about this new program. It's going to rapidly increase the number of tag templates that GTM supports out of the box. The first batch of these landed just over a week ago:
* Affiliate Window
* Ve Interactive
* Google Consumer Surveys
With this new system, tag vendors can submit a small set of files (a lot like a browser extension or mobile app). The tag template will be reviewed and tested by Google, and then automatically added to GTM's UI for everyone to use.
This new program is much faster and a lot easier for everyone involved. If you'd like to see your favorite tag inside GTM, please help us get the word out about this new program. Encourage the vendors that you work with to check it out. It's a quick, easy way to get their tags integrated into GTM.
The way we analyze the digital world today is changing in a rather dramatic way. Here is how the new world of learning analytics works (30 page article, but worth it ;))
We only analyze a partial view of business performance, digital. The great news is that, finally (!!), we can collect the complete view of the consumer journey AND understand the complete multi-channel impact AND do so without an egregious amount of pain.
Your job title should not be Digital Marketer or Digital Analyst or Digital anything. It should be... just Marketer or Business Analyst (or Universal Data Analyst as someone suggested).
This post outlines how to plot a path for your career to make it future-proof. It shares how to make it more satisfying and fun. Ain't that worth fighting for? :)
Read, and execute: http://goo.gl/DQD51O
The algorithm isn't even close to target, and it isn't possible to improve it because you can't send the items to a manually check.
Here is my post from yesterday:
Now, the same publishers are now calling for "the intervention of the Spanish and EU authorities, and the competition authorities to effectively protect the rights of citizens and companies" to prevent Google from closing Google News, thus forcing them to keep linking the newspapers (which they now have to pay for).
This is just pathetic, and it makes me barking mad.
Let me just add two more reasons why this is crazy.
First of all, can you imagine if the tables were turned? Can you imagine if an industry group went out to the EU and demanded that newspapers had to cover the press releases published by another industry, no matter what. And not only that, the newspapers would also have to pay for them.
Because that is what is going on here. In the past, newspapers were the absolute gatekeepers to information. But nobody ever demanded that a newspaper had to cover a story, nor pay the brand they were covering.
The press would have gone into a fit if anyone tried to demand how the newspaper was formed or what it contained. They would have shouted that it was an intolerable intrusion into the freedom of the press. But this is what they are doing to Google (and the internet).
How dare any newspaper demand what someone else's site must include? How dare they demand the editorial profile and decisions of others?
You can't have a one-way version of the freedom of the press.
Secondly, it should not be Google who pays the newspapers for linking to them, the newspapers should be paying Google for giving them millions of free pageviews every single month.
This, in fact, is exactly how brands think about Google. If a brand wants to get more exposure from Google, they will pay Google to place a more prominent link at the top of the search page. This is what is known as a search ad.
Yep, brands are perfectly happy paying Google for linking to them.
On that note. If a newspaper believes that Google should be paying when they link to one of their stories, why should the newspaper then not also be paying a brand when they use snippets from a press release?
If Google has to pay for using snippets, why should newspapers then not also be paying for using snippets?
Last month, for instance, seven newspapers used snippets from my site. Did they pay me for that? No, of course not. Because, as they say, they are giving me free exposure, despite the fact that they get most of the traffic. Just like with Google News.
And I'm perfectly fine with that, because I know that having other people talk about my articles helps me grow. In fact, I encourage people to quote and link to my articles. It's the best thing in the world.
Of course, what I talk about here is linking, sharing, and quoting. I’m not talking about republishing, in which a newspaper simply copy/paste the entire article or paraphrase it (which is not okay and a violation of my copyright, unless I give them permission to do so).
This is a simple concept that a lot newspapers just don’t understand. Linking is great, republishing is not ...and there is a big difference between the two.
We see this all the time. Many newspapers forget to link to the stories they use, but very often republish so much of the information that there is no reason to look up the original.
I’m not saying Google is perfect in any way. They are not. Personally, I’m happy with the notion of Google News shutting down. I see Google News as an industry distorting mechanism in which old media is getting favorable (and unearned) exposure that should have gone to someone else.
For instance, if a science blogger writes about something important, and that story is later reported by a newspaper, Google News will direct people to the newspaper instead of the science blogger who actually did all the work.
It’s the same with my site. You will never be able to find any of my articles on Google News, because I’m not one of the sites they have decided to include.
I find that to be hugely problematic, so I would prefer a world where we didn’t have Google News at all.
I also don’t like Google’s ‘knowledge search’, in which they will copy/paste guides taken from websites, and sometimes not even link back to where they got it from (when they claim the information is ‘public knowledge’).
I don’t like that because, not only is that completely unfair to those who made the information available to the public in the first place, but because that’s too much like how many newspapers are ‘reporting’ stories.
I will always favor the actual creators because, in a connected world, those are the ones we should be connected with, and not the middlemen.
Note: I wrote more about that here: You Have to Be The Creator http://www.baekdal.com/insights/you-have-to-be-the-creator/
But when it comes the Newspapers, EU, Spain and Google, I’m 100% on the side of Google, because the arguments these newspaper associations make are about things that they never themselves would accept if the tables were turned.
It’s very simple.
If a newspaper believes Google (or others) should pay for links or snippets to its article, then that newspaper should also pay when they are using information obtained from others in their own articles (which accounts for 98% of all news articles).
And if a newspaper believes that Google should be forced to link to their content, then other people should also be allowed to demand when and how a newspaper reports a story.
Either the rules apply to all, or they don’t apply at all. You can’t have rules that only apply to others.
- Neolab by KnowitHead of Analytics, 2015 - present
- Metronet ASFagansvarlig digital analyse, 2013 - 2014
- Halogen ASRådgiver, 2010 - 2013
KEYWORD (NOT PROVIDED) & THE END OF SEO DATA (PART 2 OF 2)
We find the stories in your data and take action with SEO, paid search, online advertising, user experience, and development services.
Google Plus: FaceBook Knock off or Something Else?
Tweet By the time this column is published, Google’s shiny, new social network Google+ should have approximately 20 million users. It’s one
New Facebook Features From F8 Include Timeline, “Liking As A Verb,” &...
Today’s F8 had it all. A cameo from SNL’s Andy Samberg, glitzy new designs, cutting edge new features and compelling product videos. But wha
How to Remove YouTube Logo & Branding from Embedded Videos & Player
This tutorial will show you how to remove YouTube's logo from YouTube embedded players and video embeds. You can now disable the YouTube wat
Make Facebook Comments Box Indexable by Search Engines - YOUmoz | SEOmoz
Dear SEO friends, Recently I considered implementing the Facebook Comments Box in several sites. I tried to consider the pros and cons. Th
Email Marketing: Campaign Analysis, Metrics, Best Practices
Email is an amazingly profitable marketing channel, if done right. So which email metrics matter? Learn 12 metrics dripping with insights!
Free Feedback Form for Google Analytics - Savio.no
Free Feedback Form for Google Analytics. Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Data will help you improve your website and increase convers
New Blog Design –> Responsive Design and Web Analytics Musings | Gill...
If you're reading this post on the site itself (as opposed to via RSS or email), and if you've been to the site much in the past, then you'l
How to Track Multiple Links to the same URL automatically in Google Anal...
Free script/solution for Tracking Multiple Links pointing to the same URL automatically in Google Analytics. Includes Excel report using the
How to Track Traffic from Facebook Likes, Send or Comments in Google Ana...
Learn how to Track Traffic from Facebook Likes, Send or Comments in Google Analytics, and what you should be aware of when you implement Fac
Report: Facebook Has The Most Implemented Social Plugins, Google's ...
Today BrightEdge, an enterprise SEO platform, released a report on the adoption of social sharing plugins on websites. This report also incl
Google Whores Out Users With False Privacy Claims | SEO Book.com
SEO Book. Join Free About Support Login. Home; Blog; Pricing; Community; Training. Overview SEO Training Pay Per Click Ads Tracking Results