Profile

Scrapbook photo 1
Scrapbook photo 2
Scrapbook photo 3
Scrapbook photo 4
Scrapbook photo 5
Derric Atzrott
Works at P and Z
Attends Coursera
623 followers|172,286 views
AboutPostsPhotosVideos

Stream

Derric Atzrott

Shared publicly  - 
 
Reposting this for the benefit of any who may have missed it in the community itself.
 
{Consensus can be slow and messy, but the mod panel has come to consensus on this statement:}

The moderators of Anarchist Memes wish to contribute that we intend for this space to primarily for the enjoyment of those with an anarchist perspective. It is not the intention of this space for only the anarchist perspective to be respected or tolerated but rather that an anarchist perspective would not require defense or justification in this space. To that end, we offer that Anarchist Memes is not an appropriate space to challenge anarchists about the elements of anarchism, however people may voice their disagreement or ask questions.

(For purposes of clarity, Anarchist Memes may be described as anti-capitalism, anti-fascism, anti-homophobic, anti-racist, anti-misogynist, anti-war, anti-oppression;  pro-(libertarian)socialism, pro-(libertarian)communism, pro-equality, pro-autonomy, pro-solidarity, et al..

These would be examples of appropriate questions that could be contributed in this space: "How does an anarchist perspective on property norms work?", or "What do anarchists see as the means for accomplishing social change?", or "What are the reasons anarchists are so strongly against capitalism?" (honest questions attempting to understand are appropriate)

These would be some examples of inappropriate questions for this space, "How are you going to force me to abolish private property?" or, "Why do you not support voluntary institutions like wage labour?", "Can you prove that anarchism is better than my ideology?" (loaded or rhetorical questions are not appropriate)

It is also appropriate to contribute, "I do not share agreement with this. Capitalism does not seem all that bad to me." (Voicing non-agreement is appropriate; challenging or denying anarchist perspectives is not appropriate: "I do not agree" is appropriate, while "anarchists are wrong." is not appropriate.)

"Would you be willing to discuss this vigorously outside this community?" Is an appropriate request.

The primary concern is that an anarchist perspective not require a defense or justification in this space. This is not an appropriate space to challenge anarchists about the elements of anarchism, or to engage in argument about the merits of elements of anarchism. However this is an appropriate space to ask questions and to give voice to disagreement and dissent. ("I don't agree that wage labour is necessarily problematic." is an appropriate expression of dissent; "Wage labour is entirely voluntary and consensual." is inappropriate for reasons of being unnecessarily argumentative.)

We are comfortable with persons of different vision expressing their vision but we are not comfortable with this space becoming a space where anarchists feel the need to defend or justify themselves. This space is primarily intended as a space for anarchists to feel safe and respected.
1
Derric Atzrott's profile photoTheodore Minick's profile photo
9 comments
 
It's worth the effort to waste your effort?
Add a comment...

Derric Atzrott

Shared publicly  - 
 
 
" 'When you say patriarchy' a man complained from the rear of the audience, 'I know what you really mean - me!' A lot of people hear 'men' when someone says 'patriarchy,' so that criticism of gender oppression is taken to mean that all men, each and every one of them - are oppressive people. Not surprisingly, many men take it personally if someone merely mentions patriarchy or the oppression of women, bristling at what they often see as a way to make them feel guilty. And some women feel free to blame individual men for patriarchy simply because they're men. Some of the time, men feel defensive because they identify with patriarchy and its values and don't want to face the consequences these produce or the prospect of giving up male privilege. But defensiveness more often reflects a common confusion about the difference between patriarchy as a kind of society and the people who participate in it. If we're ever going to work toward real change, it's a confusion we'll have to clear up.

"To do this, we have to realize that we're stuck in a model of social life that views everything as beginning and ending with individuals. Looking at things in this way, we tend to think that if evil exists in the world, it's only because there are evil people who have entered into an evil conspiracy. Racism exists, for example, simply because white people are racist bigots who hate members of racial and ethnic minorities and want to do them harm. There is gender oppression because men want and like to dominate women and act out hostility toward them. There is poverty and class oppression because people in the upper classes are greed, heartless, and cruel. The flip side of this individualistic model of guilt and blame is that race, gender, and class oppression are not actually oppression at all, but merely the sum of individual failings on the part of blacks, women, and the poor, who lack the right stuff to compete successfully with whites, men and others who know how to make something of themselves.

"What this kind of thinking ignores is that we are all participating in something larger that ourselves or any collection of us. On some level, most people are familiar with the idea that social life involves us in something larger than ourselves, but few seem to know what to do with that idea. When Sam Keen laments that 'THE SYSTEM is running us all,' he strikes a deep chord in many people. But he also touches on a basic misunderstanding of social life, because having blamed 'the system' (presumably society for our problems, he doesn't take the next step to understand what that might mean. What exactly is a system, for example, and how could it run us? Do we have anything to do with shaping it, and if so, how? How, for example, do we participate in patriarchy, and how does that link us to the consequences it produces? How is what we think of as 'normal' life related to male dominance, women's oppression, and the hierarchical, control-obsessed world in which they, and our lives, are embedded?

"...If we see patriarchy as nothing more than men's and women's individual personalities, motivations, and behavior, for example, then it probably won't even occur to us to ask about larger contexts - such as institutions like the family, religion, and the economy - and how people's lives are shaped in relation to them. From this kind of individualistic perspective, we might ask why a particular man raped, harassed, or beat a woman. We wouldn't ask, however, what kind of society would promote persistent patterns of such behaviors in everyday life, from wife-beating jokes to the routine inclusion of sexual coercion and violence in mainstream movies. We are quick to explain rape and battery as the acts of sick or angry men; but we rarely take seriously the question of what kind of society would produce so much male anger and pathology or direct it toward sexual violence rather than something else. We rarely ask how gender violence serve other more 'normalized" ends such as male control and domination.

"...If the goal is to change the world, this won't help us. We need to see and deal with the social roots that generate and nurture the social problems that are reflected in the behavior of individuals. We can't do this without realizing that we all participate in something larger than ourselves, something we didn't create but that we have the power to affect though the choices we make about how we participate.

"That something larger is patriarchy, which is more than a collection of the individuals (such as 'men'). It is a system, which means it can't be reduced to the people who participate in it. If you go to work for a corporation, for example, you know the minute you walk in the door that you've entered 'something' that shapes your experience and behavior, something that isn't just you and other people you work with. You can feel yourself stepping into a set of relationship and shared understandings about who's who and what 's supposed to happen and why, and all of this limits you in many ways. And when you leave at the end of day you can feel yourself released from the constraints imposed by your participation in that system; you can feel the expectations drop away and your focus shift to other systems such as family or a neighborhood bar that shape your experience in different ways. To understand a system like a corporation, we have to look at more than people like you, because all of you aren't the corporation, even though you make it run. If the corporation were just a collection of people, then whatever happened to the corporation would by definition also happen to them, and vice versa; but this clearly isn't so. A corporation can go bankrupt, for example, or cease to exist altogether without any of the people who work there going bankrupt or disappearing. Conversely, everyone who works at the corporation could quit, but that wouldn't necessarily mean the end of the corporation, only the arrival of a new set of participants. We can't understand a corporation, then, just by looking at the people who participate in it, for there is something larger and has to be understood as such.

"So, too, with patriarchy, a kind of society that is more than a collection of women and men and can't be understood simply by understanding them. We are not patriarchy, no more than people who believe in Allah are Islam or Canadians are Canada. patriarchy is a kind of society organized around certain kinds of social relationship, and ideas. As individuals, we participate in it. Paradoxically, our participation both shapes our lives and gives us the opportunity to be part of changing or perpetuating it. But we are not it, which means that patriarchy can exist without men having 'oppressive personalities' or actively conspiring with one another to defend male privilege. To demonstrate that gender oppression exists, we don't have to show that men are villains, that, women are good-hearted victims, that women don't participate in their own oppression or that men never oppose it. If a society is oppressive, than people who grow up and live in it will tend to accept, identify with, and participate in it as 'normal' and unremarkable life. That the path of least resistance in any system. Its hard not to follow it, given how we depend on society and its rewards and punishments that hinge on going along with the status quo. When oppression is woven into the fabric of everyday life, we don't need to go out of our way to be overly oppressive in order for an oppressive system to produce oppressive consequences. As the saying goes, what evil requires is simply that ordinary people do nothing."

- Allan G. Johnson ("Patriarchy, the System").

2
Jacob Zolt (Actionable Liberty)'s profile photoDerric Atzrott's profile photo
4 comments
 
That makes sense.
Add a comment...

Derric Atzrott

Shared publicly  - 
 
This is the document that had the Catholic church officially forgive the Jewish people for the death of Christ.  Interestingly in it though it calls for tolerance of all sorts by Catholics everywhere.

From the Wikipedia article:
"The fifth part states that all men are created in God's image, and that it is contrary to the teaching of the Church to discriminate against, show hatred towards or harass any person or people on the basis of colour, race, religion, condition of life and so on."

While I have not read the actual document itself, this, to me, would imply a call for tolerance and loving of all people regardless of the circumstances.  Perhaps an interesting document for Catholics, those who know Catholics, and those interested in religions in general to read.
3
Add a comment...

Derric Atzrott

Shared publicly  - 
 
"In the recent times, I have seen a lot of people who were impressed by their phone 'AppStore' and other variants of this software distribution model. I was really amazed, as I have a hard time seeing how different it is from what Debian have since 1998 with APT.

Since 2005, it is even better: software in Debian repositories is signed using cryptographic signatures. So when retrieving an application from our store, there is a really good chance that the Debian community has verified that it does not contain spyware.

The Free Software community is huge, the Debian community is quite big as well. But I still do prefer to put have some level of trust on 1000 people than to have no level of trust at all.

That's what I keep telling to the folks I help installing Debian. Together with 'you should not install random stuff downloaded from a random web site'. 'Why?' they answer, and my reply, skipping the details, boils down to 'you don't need to, everything is already in Debian'.

And I am talking about Debian stable here. Users that do not want to spend much time dealing with how their computers work. Only about the work they want to do with their computers. Having a major system upgrade every two years is more often enough in their eyes."

--Jérémy Bobbio
3
Marc Moïni's profile photoDerric Atzrott's profile photo
7 comments
 
I'd be curious to learn the actual bandwidth difference.  I bet its actually smaller than one would expect.  Debian packages tend to be much larger than Apple App Store apps are.  I might have to look into that.  Every 1 GB package downloaded from Debian uses the same bandwidth as ~50 20 MB apps from the App Store.

For things like distribution upgrades where you have tens or hundreds of thousands [citation needed] of people downloading what amounts to a service pack, I imagine the bandwidth usage is pretty high.

75 Billion apps downloaded though is pretty huge.  Even if you assume a fairly small size that is a lot of data.
Add a comment...

Derric Atzrott

Shared publicly  - 
2
Colleen Bruggman's profile photo
 
This guy is making so much sense...hope it catches on.
Add a comment...

Derric Atzrott

Shared publicly  - 
 
Round 9 of the Free and Open Source Software Outreach Project for Women is starting today.  If you are a woman (cis, trans, or genderqueer) and interested in Free Software, you should apply.  It's a great way to get involved in the Free Software community, and you can get paid for it!

Timeline:
September 12: participating organizations are announced
September 12 – October 22: applicants need to get in touch with at least one project and make a contribution to it
September 22: application system opens
October 22: application deadline at 7pm UTC
November 12: accepted participants announced at 7pm UTC
December 9 - March 9: internship period


You can find out more about the program here:
https://wiki.gnome.org/OutreachProgramForWomen
2
2
Scott Nelson's profile photoJackie Drozd's profile photo
Add a comment...
In his circles
244 people
Have him in circles
623 people
ginre ak's profile photo
Adam Wyson's profile photo
Chloe Richards's profile photo
Luke Connell's profile photo
Jason Kline's profile photo
Mike Gonsalves's profile photo
Md.Rashedul Islam's profile photo
Jonathan Larraguibel's profile photo
Arnaud Bunel's profile photo

Derric Atzrott

Shared publicly  - 
 
I have heard a lot of folk talking about this lately actually.  I thought that this video was informative and works well to debunk the myth.
13
Derric Atzrott's profile photogarith21's profile photo
20 comments
 
+Jon White
Anyways, after all of that I'll pose a few questions of my own.

1) If everything we observe about the sun indicates the sun is cooling why are current temperatures on par with 1998 even though 1998 has 2 very strong factors that affect short term temperatures pushing it abnormally high?

2) If cosmic rays apparently have such a large effect on climate then how do you explain the Laschamp event? This is an event around 40k years ago when we had a huge influx of cosmic rays but it doesn't appear to have any significant effect on climate why is this?

3) The science I'm aware of indicates that even if cosmic rays seeded clouds as people propose it should have a cooling effect, how do you predict that your proposed mechanism would warm the planet?

4) GHG based warming has a particular fingerprint with regards to where and when it warms the quickest. This fingerprint has been observed, does your proposed mechanism have a similar fingerprint?

5) In the past usually orbital factors would take us in and out of ice ages via relatively small local warming or cooling events. If not CO2 how did this result in global events? Why do you believe that warming by another method wouldn't result in similar positive feedbacks today?

6) Is there anything that would actually convince you that man made ghgs are the primary cause of most of the warming over the last half century?
Add a comment...

Derric Atzrott

Shared publicly  - 
 
"I demand the independence of woman, her right to support herself; to live for herself; to love whomever she pleases, or as many as she pleases. I demand freedom for both sexes, freedom of action, freedom in love and freedom in motherhood." -- Emma Goldman
2
1
Jacob Zolt (Actionable Liberty)'s profile photo
Add a comment...

Derric Atzrott

Shared publicly  - 
 
"Freedom is never the objective. It is the fight itself." -- The Invisible Committee Returns with "Fuck off Google" from 31c3


magnet:?xt=urn:btih:6N5HKHQVTPUSYX6CV4SJRWM2P2LBW7ZA&dn=31c3-6459-en-de-The_Invisible_Committee_Returns_with_Fuck_Off_Google_webm-hd.webm&tr=http%3a%2f%2fv4.torrent.speedpartner.de%3a6969%2fannounce
2
Derric Atzrott's profile photoMike2020able's profile photo

Derric Atzrott

Shared publicly  - 
 
 
Kathy Sierra leaves Twitter.

This month is the 10-year anniversary of my first online threat. I thought it was a one-off, then. Just one angry guy. And it wasn’t really THAT bad. But looking back, it was the canary in the coal mine… the first hint that if I kept on this path, it would not end well. And what was that path? We’ll get to that in a minute.

Later I learned that the first threat had nothing to do with what I actually made or said in my books, blog posts, articles, and conference presentations. The real problem — as my first harasser described — was that others were beginning to pay attention to me. He wrote as if mere exposure to my work was harming his world.

...

I now believe the most dangerous time for a woman with online visibility is the point at which others are seen to be listening, “following”, “liking”, “favoriting”, retweeting. In other words, the point at which her readers have (in the troll’s mind) “drunk the Koolaid”. Apparently, that just can’t be allowed. ❞
1
Add a comment...

Derric Atzrott

Shared publicly  - 
 
Just noticed my old PGP key expired.  Posting up my new one for everyone.

----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
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=/It2
---END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK---
1
William Benjamin John Davis (SinbadEV)'s profile photoDerric Atzrott's profile photoDu de KoolCats's profile photo
3 comments
 
you probably shouldnt use SHA1
Add a comment...
People
In his circles
244 people
Have him in circles
623 people
ginre ak's profile photo
Adam Wyson's profile photo
Chloe Richards's profile photo
Luke Connell's profile photo
Jason Kline's profile photo
Mike Gonsalves's profile photo
Md.Rashedul Islam's profile photo
Jonathan Larraguibel's profile photo
Arnaud Bunel's profile photo
Work
Occupation
Essentially Systems Administration
Skills
Web Development, Computer Networking, Computer Security, Critical Thinking
Employment
  • P and Z
    Web Developer, 2009 - present
  • Comstar FCU
    IS Helpdesk, 2009 - 2011
  • Career and Tech Center
    Teacher Assistant, 2010 - 2011
  • Alizee Pathology
    Computer Specialist, 2012 - 2014
Basic Information
Gender
Male
Story
Tagline
Hacktivist, Bitcoin Advocate, Pacifist, Feminist
Introduction
Lets see if I can sum myself up with as few words as possible.

Heroes:
His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama
Mahatma Gandhi
Richard Stallman
Rick Falkvinge

Hacker
Anarchist without Adjectives
Unreformed Stallmanite
Intellectual
Supporter of Free Culture
Pirate
Bitcoin Enthusiast
Buddhist
Compassionate Communicator
Sex-positive Feminist
Long-haired cipherpunk hippy
Bragging rights
A+, CCENT, CCNA, FBI Guy
Education
  • Coursera
    Continuing Education, 2012 - present
    I've been studying a variety of topics through Coursera as a plan to be a lifelong learner. Courses so far include topics such as: Anthropology, History, Cryptography, Business, and Climate Change. Upcoming courses include: Ethics and Philosophy.
  • Catoctin High School
    2007 - 2010
    Graduated early.
  • Career and Technology Center
    Network Engineering, 2008 - 2010
    Took courses on Computer Repair and Maintenance and on Network Engineering.
  • Frederick Community College
    Network Engineering, 2009 - 2011
    Took general education courses to finish off a degree in Network Engineering. Never actually finished though as I ran out of funds.
Links
Other profiles
Contributor to