Likes, being able to be sold and bought have been discredited and deprecated. In a more nuanced world where Facebook needs to know what you think so it can charge marketers more for your emotions it clearly needs more buttons.
They are coming.
Just so long as you understand what you are getting into and why it's happening (i.e. It's not about you. It never has been ;) ). Dive in: http://goo.gl/U1zDWC
- Cruwys news (current)
DNA Wiki -- Find out what the experts think about DNA
Thanks to a comment by a reader, I got a link to the International Society of Genetic Genealogy (ISOGG) Wiki. This resource is billed as a "
The Folly of Using Small Segments as Proof in Genealogical Research, Par...
Responsible genealogists adhere to high standards of proof in their research, in the evidence that they present and in the conclusions they
Church Record Sunday - Parochial Registers of Borris Carlow ~ Kirwans an...
Apparently a few years ago a cousin contacted me whose ancestor Anna Kirwan Downey was sister to my Great Grandmother Sadie Kirwan Carrow. S
Your Genetic Genealogist: First Look at the Full Genomes Y-Sequencing Re...
GRCh37 is the Genome Reference Consortium human genome (build 37). I guess it is a reference genome similar to CRS or RSRS for mtDNA. This t
Open data: we need to share research results, even when they are wrong
There are huge flaws in the way research data is uploaded, says Mark Hahnel, but how far are we from a universal solution?
Not breaking news: many scientific studies are ultimately proved wrong!
Sylvia McLain: Most theories are eventually consigned to the rubbish heap, but this is scientific business as usual
Exaggerations and errors in the promotion of genetic ancestry testing « ...
Early_diversification. One thing we have done in Genomes Unzipped is to report on what is on the market for consumers interested in getting