David S. Rose commented on a post on Blogger.
This is one of the more calm and rational analyses of investing in women entrepreneurs that I have yet heard, and I completely agree. Bravo to Adam for making what to me is a persuasive case. The reason there aren't more women entrepreneurs being funded is NOT because of discrimination, and the reason one should invest in women entrepreneurs is NOT because "it's the right thing to do to justify historic inquiries" or because "they should have an equal chance." Rather, as Adam points out, it's just Good Business!
one plus one
Shared publicly•View activity
- Thanks for this David!Nov 26, 2013
- INDEED!!Nov 26, 2013
- I really liked this post too. I think it came across as calm and rational because a man wrote it, unfortunately. People ascribe way too much emotion to these things when women write them.Nov 27, 2013
- lol, I just don't even want to get started .....May 2, 2014
- Adam is a tireless advocate for female entrepreneurs and an active angel investor in women-led companies. He's also a celebrated and quite successful financial analyst with a brilliant mind. He's not saying this stuff to "feel good". He ran the numbers.May 2, 2014
Add a comment...