Public Relations  - 
From a Tweet after class great things can happen. The power of Twitter (and network communication) wrapped up in a real student case study:
I am delighted for Nawal Leon Kurson, of course, but part of me also wants to follow through the network effect (and the G+ SEO effect) and this is a good opportunity. Thanks Newal.
Mat Morrison's profile photoDavid Phillips's profile photo
Having never studied Grunig (or PR) I'm a little lost here. One question though: is the author saying that stakeholders and the audience are the same thing? This would seem to be a dangerous assumption to make.

Furthermore, I'm not sure that I understand how your segmentation model (as expressed by the author)...

> [People] form segments when they share a nexus of values with each other or a common community perspective.

...can be used to address the public relations needs of an organisation.

For example; let's say that of 3 people, Alice, Bob, Carol (and using very broad brushstrokes):

* Alice & Bob support Arsenal
* Bob & Carol support UKiP
* Bob believes that the church should support gay marriage
* Alice believes that David Icke might actually have a point

how, then, do we use this to address the fact that Alice, Bob, and Carol are all afraid that my client's products may contain GM products and aggrieved that they're apparently dodging UK taxes?

And how much does it matter that Alice works for HMRC, while Bob is a Euro MP?
Absolutely love it.
There are lots of ways we can approach this.
A really mechanistic method is to use Google adwords keyword tool to look up the semantic concepts that describe Arsenal. The words are: fixtures tickets world shop transfers shirt kit stadium tour
 etc'. These words are derived from a semantic analysis of words people use when they seek information about Arsenal. Of course these are the values that describe football. Try it. Its amazing! 
The power of sematics. For UKiP the values of forum policies manifesto plane org crash leader wiki party meps and logo emerge.
What is happening is that  Google is describing the values that emerge from the activity of people with specific interests.

These are descriptions of value based segments. It is what was described by Bruno Amaral in his Bled paper in 2009. For PR a big academic change - it is empirical research!

What we are seeing is segmentation based on semantic 'values'.

It may seem odd that such values that are not specific to the actual subject describe it so well in Search engines. It is because they have used the concept of human values at the heart of their response to human need.

As you build up these value models, the semantic concepts, allow you to find the values held in common and they then form the values people share. 

Shared concepts (a nexus of common values)  are the basis for relationships (I did a paper about this years ago).

There you are. This is how it all works and we can even use Google to help us.

To be really cool, there are better software approaches that can be used.
Add a comment...