Profile

Cover photo
David House Sr.
Works at Lapeer Photography
Attends Google.com/+DavidHouseSr
1,661 followers|593,815 views
AboutPostsCollectionsPhotos

Stream

David House Sr.

Shared publicly  - 
 
Test... From MotoX-v2013
Speedtest result. http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/1297145636
1
Add a comment...

David House Sr.

Shared publicly  - 
 
Upper Falls, Hocking Hills, Ohio USA
GPS Location: https://goo.gl/ABpSpg

#Hockinghills   #Waterfall   #Ohio  
3
Add a comment...

David House Sr.

Shared publicly  - 
 
Sandhill Crane on her nest
https://goo.gl/or09PO
#Birds  
2
Rick Blaine's profile photo
 
Nice!
Add a comment...

David House Sr.

Shared publicly  - 
 
Streaming Audio Sucks
If you are interest in High quality Audio, with very technical explanation, and lots of information, this video is for you!.
Also, why You Tube Sucks for Audio.

#Youtube   #HighQualityAudio   #StreamingAudio   #Audio  
.

https://youtu.be/SXbH-yzGNfg      
1
1
Lar Doyle's profile photo
Add a comment...

David House Sr.

Shared publicly  - 
For years Patrick Norton has been a familiar figure to computer nerds everywhere, dispensing cheerful commentary and advice about the latest tech news and gear. You may know him best from his time at Tekzilla; personally I first watched Patrick as host of The Screen Savers back in the good old days of TechTV.
1
Add a comment...

David House Sr.

Shared publicly  - 
 
Home made Apple Pi Day !!
My wife rocks!
1
Erik Gallimore's profile photo
 
Awesome! Looks great. 
Add a comment...
Have him in circles
1,661 people
Diana Nimara's profile photo
Wes Woods's profile photo
Susanne Ramharter's profile photo
Robert Simpson's profile photo
maxime fouquette's profile photo
Timothy Agee's profile photo
Nikita Dementev's profile photo
Nkt Kastinger's profile photo
Scott Johnson's profile photo

David House Sr.

Shared publicly  - 
 
Desert View Tower - Grand Canyon, AZ USA
I was setting up to photograph this tower, when I moved a certain way I got the sun glare in the window. Rather than my first instinct to move, I decided to go ahead and take the glare shot. Glad I did, else it would only be a memory. 

Side note: This is somewhat of an optical illusion (at least to me). When I look at this image straight on, it is straight, but if I have to the left or right it appears to lean that way. Maybe it's just an affect of my glasses?  Location: https://goo.gl/XHlMf3

#grandcanyon   #Desertview  
1
Add a comment...

David House Sr.

Shared publicly  - 
Scott Hanselman on Programming, User Experience, The Zen of Computers and Life in General
1
Rick Blaine's profile photoDavid House Sr.'s profile photo
2 comments
 
Hey +Rick Blaine​, I have one. Using it with Kodi for home theater right now. Not messed with other than that.

Looking forward to see W10 on it.
Add a comment...

David House Sr.

Shared publicly  - 
 
GPIO in 1 minute 
The first video to watch if you don't even know what GPIO is. :)
https://youtu.be/jwWxKACHWxs

#raspberrypi   #arduino   #GPIO   #IoT  
1
Add a comment...

David House Sr.

Shared publicly  - 
 
Good article and discussion that follows. If you are interested in this sort of thing. :)
 
Steve Denning reveals how clueless he is about Google+... again!

Pro tip: If you want serious traffic to your column, say Google+ is dead. Your page will be hammered by hoards of passionate Google+ fans who come to disagree with you. 

It's a lesson Steve Denning learned for his first "Google+ is dead column," so now he's back for another helping of Google+ traffic in his latest missive, called "Has Google+ really died"? 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2015/04/23/has-google-really-died/

(I'm not criticizing Denning -- yet! -- I myself drive huge traffic from Google+ to my own columns. That's because Google+ is very much alive.) 

Anyway, Denning launches into a defense of his first column, but succeeds mainly in demonstrating a profound ignorance about Google+. 

I'm here to help. 

Here's what Steve Denning got wrong: 

1. Assuming public posts = active use.

Denning is relying on a spectacularly useless metric for defining active use, which is public posting (by relying on the Stone Temple Consulting report) 

It doesn't take into account the default kind of post, which is non-public. A huge number of users have stage fright about posting publicly, and a probably even huger number don't know their posts are public. (If you want to criticize Google+, here's one criticism you can levy -- the whole Public vs. Circles posting issue is confusing to new users.) 

It doesn't take into account people who mainly or exclusively engage through comments. Because Google+ organizes posts differently than, say, Twitter, comments are not viewed as "posts," even though people are fully engaged in social interaction through comments. If I comment on something posted on Twitter, my comment is counted as a full-blown "post" or Tweet. If I post the same comment to the same post on Google+, my comment is not counted as anything by Stone Temple. 

It doesn't take into account people who mainly "consume" content without commenting much, even though they feel they're active users of Google+. 


2. Trying to have it both ways on the accidental "users."

Denning again goes astray by relying on Stone Temple's skewed messaging on their report. Yes, when you get a Google password for some other Google property, that counts as a Google+ account. So most of the 2.2 billion Google users aren't really Google+ users in actual fact. They then go on to use "randomly selected" profiles knowing full well that most of these are non users. 

You can't have it both ways. Either they're users to be counted as users, in which case Google+ is vastly bigger than Facebook -- or they're non users, and not to be counted in numbers about how active the average "user" is. 


3. Failing to appreciate the nature of the Google+ "cult."

Denning points out that many comments on his first column "seemed to resemble that of people defending a struggling religious cult, rather than the users of a mere software tool."

The gratuitous word "struggling" is passive-aggressive spin to support his narrative. But the point is well taken. Google+ people sound like a cult. Just like Apple fans. Or Android fans. Or Reddit users. 

Unlike Twitter or Facebook, Google has created an army of truly passionate users. 

In fact Apple is a perfect comparison. Apple has less than 7% of the global PC market. Does anyone say Apple's PC business is "dead"? No, because they have the highest-quality PCs and laptops and the highest-quality customers (in terms of income and education levels) -- exactly like Google+. 

Nobody likes to hear me say this, but Google+ is the Apple of social networks. (Actually, I think Guy Kawasaki was first to say something like this.) 

It's not a place like Facebook for grandma to post cat photos. And it's not a place like Twitter for people to speak in hashtag code and URLs. It's the only place where you can pursue your passions will brilliant, like-minded people who are truly interested in the same things you are. 

Yes: Google+ is a "cult." Only the highest quality tech products produce "cults." 


4. Equating tech press echo chamber bias with the "emerging consensus."

Denning trots out a smattering of Google+ hater headlines to provide "evidence" for the "emerging consensus" about Google+. (And check the numbers: Those articles got HUGE traffic from the Google+ "cult," too.)

As I've said many times, the press hates Google+ precisely BECAUSE it's not a ghost town. Any post on Google+ by a prominent writer will be greeted by long, well thought-out criticisms, challenging the writer's assumptions and calling the writer out for mistakes. Google+ isn't easy and breezy for public writers like Twitter and even Facebook are. 

This is the last thing a journalist wants after writing and editing all day. 

What the tech press wants is Twitter, where they can dash off quick and clever lines off the top of their heads (like this one: https://twitter.com/MikeElgan/status/591584837347061762 ) that will be neither challenged nor heavily discussed. 

That's why the tech press feels so threatened by Google+. There's too much going on: too much argument, too much to read. And so they've been out to kill it from the beginning. 


5. Equating dismantling with abandonment.

Denning quotes more Twitter-loving echo chamber journalists who assume Google spinning off things like Hangouts or Photos would be evidence for neglect and decline. (These are the same kind of journalists who said that Google moving Glass into its own product group meant that they're killing it.) It's all just wishful thinking by Plus haters in the press.

Fact is, the unnatural integration of everything years ago was just a strategy Google was trying. It didn't have the desired effect, honked off a bunch of people who didn't want things to be integrated, so now they've changed the strategy. 

The experience of using Google+, and the benefits, haven't changed one bit. (In fact, It would be improved by further de-coupling, specifically if YouTube and their trolls were surgically removed.)


6. Pretending to have tried Google+.

Denning says his "own efforts to love Google+ were unsuccessful." Looking at his profile, I see that he's posted publicly twice ever, hasn't even filled out his profile or even uploaded a profile banner pic. Running a search, I see that he doesn't engage with comments or communities. 

Steve Denning is a non-user. He has NOT made an effort to love Google+. I imagine if he had only posted two tweets on Twitter, he wouldn't understand that social network either. 

And this item is related to....


7. Completely failing to understand Google+ fan opposition to yet another non-user saying Google+ is dead.

Denning is making the mistake of publically making the same mistake many people have before. As I've pointed out many times, you cannot understand the power and the glory of Google+ unless you really use it. 

Denning is just another Arthur Spooner: 

https://plus.google.com/113117251731252114390/posts/9LE3GM6sLBF

Denning and other Arthur Spooners are confused about why Google+ fans have an issue with this phenomenon. And so I'm going to make it so clear that nobody who reads this can retain their confusion. Here goes. 

1. Google+ is the best social anything ever. 

2. This can be only understood if you're truly active on G+ for weeks or months. 

3. Influential writers who have not taken the time to understand have slammed Google+ from a place of ignorance. 

4. Because this has been repeated so many times, many, many people think Google+ is "bad" in some way. 

5. Bottom line: Ignorant people are the biggest threat to Google+, and are hurting the reputation of best social anything ever. 

Is that clear enough? 


8. Failing to appreciate the importance of Google+ for Google itself.

Google isn't going to kill Google+ because the site provides huge benefits for the company. 

First, Google+ is a necessary social component for Google's wearable computing platforms -- you know, the future of computing? 

Google Glass and Android Wear and future initiatives rely heavily on Google+ for understanding user social graphs, displaying birthdays, sharing photos and videos and much more. 

Google+ is a great platform for Google employees, engineers and executives to brainstorm, announce things, and learn about their most passionate fans and users. (Where else would they do this, Facebook?)

Google+ is still useful for cultivating the most passionate fans of Google itself, as well as Android. Google+ puts the "cult" in cultivating. Google would be insane to cut their most loyal, passionate and enthusiastic users off at the knees. 

In a nutshell, Steve Denning is just plain wrong about Google+. 

(Photo is massively unrelated to the post)
149 comments on original post
2
Add a comment...

David House Sr.

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
My Add-ons list goes from Program Add-ons to Screensavers. I need to research how to get the "PVR clients" added to this list... XBMC/KODI (RasPi2) is new to me. I'm using an OpenELEC distro. Do I need a different Distro or install the PVR option on this one?
Researching I go.....
1
Add a comment...
David's Collections
People
Have him in circles
1,661 people
Diana Nimara's profile photo
Wes Woods's profile photo
Susanne Ramharter's profile photo
Robert Simpson's profile photo
maxime fouquette's profile photo
Timothy Agee's profile photo
Nikita Dementev's profile photo
Nkt Kastinger's profile photo
Scott Johnson's profile photo
Work
Occupation
Photographer
Employment
  • Lapeer Photography
    Owner, 2000 - present
  • Technology Consultant
    Geek, 1982 - 2014
  • David House Photography
    Photographer, 1985 - 2000
Basic Information
Gender
Male
Looking for
Networking
Story
Tagline
Husband, Father, Photographer - Michigan USA
Introduction
I am David House Sr. an independent Michigan Photographer, office and studio in Lapeer. I provide professional portrait photography to Corporate, Small business and Associations. 
I create images for company and product advertising, web, brochure, and catalogs.Also, creating portraits in Studio and Location for Families, Kids, and Senior Graduates (aka "Senior Pictures")

Technology stuff: 
I am way older than the Internet. I never had an AOL account, I was a CompuServe and DowJones News Service user, prior to the "internet". The first computer I owned was a TRS-80 Model III, then a Model 4, then a IBM PC (8088) 2x180K floppy drives, then a 80386 PC, etc... Though I have never owned an Apple, I worked at a company with Lisa's (and 10MB ext HD's). I spent many hours on the Lisa's, but to this day use MS Windows computers and laptops.

My G+ Posts: 
+DavidHouseSr or click "Posts" in the menu under the large photo above. 



Send me an Email 

Fave Quote:
Great minds discuss ideas
Average minds discuss events
Small minds discuss people
            ~Eleanor Roosevelt


*Note about adding me to Circles: I am happy if you add me to your circle, I hope I can provide content that is interesting and or educational. I will likely add you back if when I click your G+ the content is acceptable and your profile looks 'lagit'. Have a super day! Thanks.
Bragging rights
My wife is lovely in all ways!
Education
  • Google.com/+DavidHouseSr
    2013 - present
  • Classified
    1978 - 1984
Contact Information
Work
Phone
810-895-2126
Email