Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Darius Garsys
Computer consultant, Mac expert, Sci-Fi and gaming geek.
Computer consultant, Mac expert, Sci-Fi and gaming geek.

Darius's posts

Post has shared content
I've been informed that someone has created an "orangelist" of Trump supporters in the game industry, and that Ad Astra Games is top of the list, largely due to alphabetical order.

The progenitor of the list says that all entities on the list were contacted before he added them. We have no record of this contact for Ad Astra.

At least two other game companies listed on the "orangelist" have been out of business for ten years, and one designer listed has been dead since 1997.
Ad Astra's position is that we'll work with anyone who knows our products and does work we can use, and that whomever you voted for in this election is your business, not ours.

While we were going to create a Black Friday discount code that ran through the first Sunday in December...we're going to start it a day or two earlier than normal, and call it the NoOrangeList code instead.


Post has shared content
Gotta think this over before commenting, but at first glance, yeah
I've been pondering skill systems in RPGs lately. Most skill systems seem to work as follows:
1) A few skills (and/or attributes underlying those skills) are disproportionately more useful than others, so every player character tends to be built to emphasize those skills.
2) The skill system uses an escalating system of point costs (so that, say, going from 3 to 4 costs more than from 1 to 2), such that specialization is very costly.
3) The character development system does not require any maintenance of skills; characters can simultaneously maintain expertise in a wide variety of fields.
4) Any character can attempt any task, and reward from skill is largely linear. The difference between a skill level of 2 and 3 is +1, or 5%, or whatever the system uses. There is no qualitative difference between skill levels.
5) Characters acquiring new skills don't gain any benefit from already knowing similar, related skills. Even though you have Handgun +10 you somehow still have to start with Rifle at +0.

The net result is that characters tend to be mechanically quite similar. Everyone will tend to be competent in the handful of skills that are important to gameplay, with differences measured in a couple points here and there, with each character perhaps having one somewhat unusual skill ("I'm the Demolitions guy") but even there not being so advantaged that a good roll/Luck point/Bennie isn't more than enough to make up the difference.
The above outcome isn't necessarily a bad thing. For campaigns wit small numbers of player characters, role-playing super-competent heroes, it's great. James Bond does well with a skill system.
But for games that have large numbers of player characters, it can feel like no one PC really has a particular niche or uniqueness. The problem is especially bad in genres that don't have something like magic to spice it up (e.g. Westerns). Good role-players can certainly make any given bundle of numbers feel unique, of course. But a lot of players want more. I've had several failures in getting Traveller campaigns off the ground because my players wanted more meat in their character mechanics.
A lot of systems resolve the mechanical problems above by tacking on a system of advantages/disadvantages of some sort. Savage Worlds, for instance, has all attributes and skills confined to a tiny range (d4 to d12, basically 1-5) but manages to allow for lots of character diversity through its advantages and disadvantages.
But it seems like a totally different approach to a skill system might viably solve the problem in a different way. I imagine a system where:
1) The difficult in learning improving a skill isn't based just on how high your skill in X currently is, but in how high your skill in everything is - all skills would be totaled to create a "total level of skill" representing how much time and effort is required to stay good at what you already do. Kids learn faster than adults, etc.
2) To the extent that your skills are related your maintenance requirement would be lower - it's much easier to maintain and improve the set of skills Handgun +6, Rifle +6, SMG +6 then to be Handgun +6, Surgery +6, Arabic Language +6..
3) To avoid a situation where skills are just linear improvements, and create qualitative interest, each skill is associated with a selection of feats/advantages and increasing in skill allows you to choose those feats/advantages.
At which point I realize I've basically reverse-engineered a Class system with multi-classing.

Post has shared content

Post has attachment
What came up as today's random XKCD cartoon:

Post has shared content
Fond memories of the Talsorian stuff from the 80's

Post has shared content
OK - that is sooooooo true.

Post has shared content
Oh Crap

Hi Guys

New here, but looking for someone who can either coach me on how to actually get the official online client working for two players to join as participants, or another option for online play. Looking to play my son who's in California, while I'm on the east coast.

Post has shared content

Post has shared content
A lot of people "use" computers, but don't actually USE computers, try to figure out how they work, or understand enough to even begin guessing WHY something doesn't.

Wait while more posts are being loaded