Shared publicly  - 
 
Haven't looked at this closely, but Francis is a smart man with a great track record of comparing civil liberties to current statute.
3
Tim Waugh's profile photoJay Blanc's profile photoThomas Dell's profile photo
4 comments
 
That does depend entirely on defining Google+ as a content service rather than a communication service. And even if you can define Google+ as a content service, you can't define Gtalk and Gmail as a content service, and all Google+ subscribers are also Gtalk and Gmail subscribers.

Also note that the Directory service is Google Profiles, a service that pre-dates Google+.
 
I don't think gtalk/gmail is relevant. +Bradley Horowitz has debunked the myth that naming violations lock you out of everything:

When an account is suspended for violating the Google+ common name standards, access to Gmail or other products that don’t require a Google+ profile are not removed. Please help get the word out: if your Google+ Profile is suspended for not using a common name, you won't be able to use Google services that require a Google+ Profile, but you'll still be able to use Gmail, Docs, Calendar, Blogger, and so on. (Of course there are other Google-wide policies (e.g. egregious spamming, illegal activity, etc) that do apply to all Google products, and violations of these policies could in fact lead to a Google-wide suspension.)

(https://plus.google.com/113116318008017777871/posts/VJoZMS8zVqU)
 
+Tim Waugh This isn't a matter of account deletions, but legality under EU privacy law about subscriber directories. Google Profiles is a subscriber directory service, and it does tie into the communication services GMail and GTalk. Also, GTalk is actually integrated into Google+ as it runs the Huddle and Hangout features.
 
Naming violations may not lock you out of everything, but I'd bet that minor content violations (posting something just over the line) probably would.
Add a comment...