nice analogy.. but isnt the west well known for thier humanitarian law.. Gosh, i remember a burglar suing a home owner because his roof wasnt strong enough to hold the burglars weight (ofcourse he fell through whilst in progress of robbing him). and he won the case too. Now this guy admitted to carrying out a burglary..still got away scott free with remuniration.
what about that guy from Norway, went on a shooting spree. why did he even have a trial when he confessed on the first day that he did it in complete sanity and deliberation.
All this malarky to me is just a form of suppression and ethnic cleansing.
if you want to deport someone, deport Anjem Chaudhry.. the asshole doesnt represent any religion..oh wait..u cant cos u put him there. oops.
ok..how about that asshole altaf hussain and all the other 'asylum seekers' who ruined countries, killed innocents and then come crawling asking for asylum..deport them.. oh..drats..you put them there too.
The definition of terrorism is so dilute and pigeon holed now that none of this makes sense. to me the BNP are terrorists.. hooligans are terrorists. any person who makes me feel scared or fills me with 'terror' is a terrorist.. why is this word only used in specific sense? I cant walk down the street without being scared of being jumped by some BNP supporters.. thats terrorism.. expel them too then.
Are people not scared of sending thier children to school in sandy hook? or a gay person in the same town as west boro church. how about going to the cinema and being afraid to get shot. Sure they are american examples, but the principle is the same.
This is just simple BS. as +Nikki Whiteman said, suspects are not criminals. Have the court hearings at the airport so if u are found guilty you are expelled immediately. but to use this as an excuse for 'ethnic cleansing' is just clear as mud.